SELF-REPORT OF EMPATHY: A SHORTENED FRENCH ADAPTATION OF THE INTERPERSONAL REACTIVITY INDEX (IRI) USING TWO LARGE BELGIAN SAMPLES

被引:22
作者
Braun, Stephanie [1 ]
Rosseel, Yves [2 ]
Kempenaers, Chantal [1 ]
Loas, Gwenole [1 ]
Linkowski, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Brussels, Erasmus Hosp, Dept Psychiat, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Dept Data Anal, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; COEFFICIENT ALPHA; VALIDATION; RELIABILITY; VERSION; NUMBER;
D O I
10.2466/08.02.PR0.117c23z6
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
For more than 30 years, the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) has been used to measure the multidimensional aspects of empathy. But the 28-item, 4-factor model of Davis (1980) is currently contested because of methodological issues and for theoretical reasons. Confirmatory (CFA) and exploratory factor analyses (EFA) were applied in two French-speaking Belgian student samples (1,244 participants in the first and 729 in the second study) to test this model and to propose a shortened version. A non-optimal fit was found with respect to the CFI value (Study 1). By splitting the student group into two random subsamples, EFA and then CFA were used to propose a 15-item, 4-factor model with good fit indices. A CFA on the second student group (Study 2) replicated this model. Results are discussed considering the influence of social desirability response bias, an absence of strong invariance across sex and the usefulness of self-report scales to measure empathy.
引用
收藏
页码:735 / 753
页数:19
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Latent structure of the Davis Interpersonal Reactivity Index in methadone maintenance patients [J].
Alterman, AI ;
McDermott, PA ;
Cacciola, JS ;
Rutherford, MJ .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT, 2003, 25 (04) :257-265
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Empathy reconsidered: New directions in psychotherapy
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1980, A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy
[4]  
Atkins M.W., 1999, The assessment of empathy: An evaluation of the interpersonal reactivity index
[5]  
BENTLER PM, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P238, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
[6]   Responding to the emotions of others: Dissociating forms of empathy through the study of typical and psychiatric populations [J].
Blair, RJR .
CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2005, 14 (04) :698-718
[7]  
Browne M. W., 1993, Testing structural equation models, P136, DOI DOI 10.1177/0049124192021002005
[8]  
Byrne B, 2010, INTERNATIONAL HANDBOOK OF PSYCHOLOGY IN EDUCATION, P3
[9]   REPLICATION OF STRUCTURE FINDINGS REGARDING THE INTERPERSONAL REACTIVITY INDEX [J].
CAREY, JC ;
FOX, EA ;
SPRAGGINS, EF .
MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION IN COUNSELING AND DEVELOPMENT, 1988, 21 (03) :102-105
[10]  
Carrasco MA, 2011, PSICOTHEMA, V23, P824