共 50 条
Comparison of fresh osteochondral autografts and allografts - A canine model
被引:71
|作者:
Glenn, R. Edward, Jr.
McCarty, Eric C.
Potter, Hollis G.
Juliao, Saul F.
Gordon, Jeffrey D.
Spindler, Kurt P.
机构:
[1] Vanderbilt Sports Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed & Rehabil, Nashville, TN USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Orthopaed, Denver, CO 80202 USA
[3] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Magnet Resonance Imaging, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
关键词:
osteochondral;
allograft;
autograft;
articular cartilage;
D O I:
10.1177/0363546505284846
中图分类号:
R826.8 [整形外科学];
R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学];
R726.2 [小儿整形外科学];
R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background: Osteochondral autografts and allografts have been widely used in the treatment of isolated grade IV articular cartilage lesions of the knee. However, the authors are not aware of any study that has prospectively compared fresh osteochondral autografts to fresh allografts with regard to imaging, biomechanical testing, and histology. Hypothesis: The imaging, biomechanical properties, and histologic appearance of fresh osteochondral autograft and fresh allograft are similar with respect to bony incorporation into host bone, articular cartilage composition, and biomechanical properties. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Eighteen adult dogs underwent bilateral knee osteochondral graft implantation after creation of an Outerbridge grade IV cartilage defect. One knee received an autograft, and the contralateral knee received a fresh allograft. Nine dogs were sacrificed at 3 months, and 9 dogs were sacrificed at 6 months. Graft analysis included gross examination, radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, biomechanical testing, and histology. Results: Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated excellent bony incorporation of both autografts and allografts. Biomechanical testing demonstrated no significant difference between autografts versus allografts versus control at 3 or 6 months (P = .36-.91). A post hoc calculation showed 80% power to detect a 30% difference between allograft and control. Histologic examination showed normal cartilage structure for both autografts and allografts. Conclusion: Fresh osteochondral autograft and fresh allograft tissues are not statistically different with respect to bony incorporation, articular cartilage composition, or biomechanical properties up to 6 months after implantation. Clinical Relevance: The use of fresh allograft tissue to treat osteochondral defects eliminates morbidity associated with harvesting autograft tissue without compromising the results of the surgical procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:1084 / 1093
页数:10
相关论文