Comparison of fresh osteochondral autografts and allografts - A canine model

被引:71
|
作者
Glenn, R. Edward, Jr.
McCarty, Eric C.
Potter, Hollis G.
Juliao, Saul F.
Gordon, Jeffrey D.
Spindler, Kurt P.
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Sports Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed & Rehabil, Nashville, TN USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Orthopaed, Denver, CO 80202 USA
[3] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Magnet Resonance Imaging, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
关键词
osteochondral; allograft; autograft; articular cartilage;
D O I
10.1177/0363546505284846
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Osteochondral autografts and allografts have been widely used in the treatment of isolated grade IV articular cartilage lesions of the knee. However, the authors are not aware of any study that has prospectively compared fresh osteochondral autografts to fresh allografts with regard to imaging, biomechanical testing, and histology. Hypothesis: The imaging, biomechanical properties, and histologic appearance of fresh osteochondral autograft and fresh allograft are similar with respect to bony incorporation into host bone, articular cartilage composition, and biomechanical properties. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Eighteen adult dogs underwent bilateral knee osteochondral graft implantation after creation of an Outerbridge grade IV cartilage defect. One knee received an autograft, and the contralateral knee received a fresh allograft. Nine dogs were sacrificed at 3 months, and 9 dogs were sacrificed at 6 months. Graft analysis included gross examination, radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, biomechanical testing, and histology. Results: Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated excellent bony incorporation of both autografts and allografts. Biomechanical testing demonstrated no significant difference between autografts versus allografts versus control at 3 or 6 months (P = .36-.91). A post hoc calculation showed 80% power to detect a 30% difference between allograft and control. Histologic examination showed normal cartilage structure for both autografts and allografts. Conclusion: Fresh osteochondral autograft and fresh allograft tissues are not statistically different with respect to bony incorporation, articular cartilage composition, or biomechanical properties up to 6 months after implantation. Clinical Relevance: The use of fresh allograft tissue to treat osteochondral defects eliminates morbidity associated with harvesting autograft tissue without compromising the results of the surgical procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:1084 / 1093
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Osteochondral Autografts and Allografts for Treatment of Recurrent or Large Talar Osteochondral Lesions
    Ahmad, Jamal
    Jones, Kennis
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 37 (01) : 40 - 50
  • [2] Variability in the Processing of Fresh Osteochondral Allografts
    Paul, Kyle D.
    Patel, Romil K.
    Arguello, Alexandra M.
    Kwapisz, Adam
    Brabston, Eugene W.
    Stannard, James P.
    Ponce, Brent A.
    Momaya, Amit M.
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2023, 36 (04) : 450 - 455
  • [3] Prolonged-fresh preservation of intact whole canine femoral condyles for the potential use as osteochondral allografts
    Williams, JM
    Virdi, AS
    Pylawka, TK
    Edwards, RB
    Markel, MD
    Cole, BJ
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2005, 23 (04) : 831 - 837
  • [4] Fresh osteochondral allografts in the knee: only a salvage procedure?
    Gobbi, Alberto
    Scotti, Celeste
    Lane, John G.
    Peretti, Giuseppe M.
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2015, 3 (12)
  • [5] Role of Fresh Osteochondral Allografts for Large Talar Osteochondral Lesions
    Gross, Christopher E.
    Adams, Samuel B.
    Easley, Mark E.
    Nunley, James A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2016, 24 (01) : E9 - E17
  • [6] Use of Fresh Osteochondral Allografts in the Patellofemoral Joint
    Lattermann, Christian
    Kremser, Victor
    Altintas, Burak
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2018, 31 (03) : 227 - 230
  • [7] Separating allografts and autografts
    Van Wicklin, Sharon A.
    Brubaker, Scott A.
    AORN JOURNAL, 2014, 100 (06) : 695 - 697
  • [8] Fresh Osteochondral Allografts for Large-Volume Cystic Osteochondral Defects of the Talus
    Raikin, Steven M.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2009, 91A (12) : 2818 - 2826
  • [9] Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus Treated With Fresh Talar Allografts
    Hahn, David B.
    Aanstoos, Megan E.
    Wilkins, Ross M.
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 31 (04) : 277 - 282
  • [10] Comparison of Structural Bone Autografts and Allografts in Pediatric Foot Surgery
    Vining, Neil C.
    Warme, Winston J.
    Mosca, Vincent S.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2012, 32 (07) : 719 - 723