Ways to use interventions to increase participation in mail-out bowel cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:21
作者
Myers, Larry [1 ]
Goodwin, Belinda [2 ]
March, Sonja [1 ,2 ]
Dunn, Jeff [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Queensland, Sch Psychol & Counselling, Springfield Cent, Qld 4300, Australia
[2] Univ Southern Queensland, Inst Resilient Reg, Springfield Cent, Qld 4300, Australia
[3] Canc Council Queensland, Canc Res Ctr, Fortitude Valley, Qld 4006, Australia
[4] Univ Queensland, Sch Social Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[5] Griffith Univ, Sch Med, Brisbane, Qld 4122, Australia
关键词
Fecal occult blood test; Colorectal cancer; Population screening; Systematic review; COLORECTAL-CANCER; PROGRAM; IMPACT; ENDORSEMENT; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1093/tbm/ibz081
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The impact of colorectal cancer can be reduced through nationwide fecal occult blood test (FOBT) screening. Unfortunately, participation in screening programs are low with interventions only increasing participation modestly. This meta-analysis explores if intervention effectiveness can be increased by targeting specific subpopulations with specific interventions or by combining interventions. Six databases were searched for studies aiming to increase participation in mail-out FOBT screening. To investigate if interventions are more effective for certain subpopulations, the difference in (log) Risk Ratios (RRs) between alternate subpopulations (male vs. female; low vs. high Socioeconomic Status (SES); <65 vs. >= 65 years) was assessed. To investigate if interventions should be combined, uptake rates for single interventions were compared to uptake rates for combined interventions. Cochrane Collaboration tools were used to assess the risk of bias. Searches found 3,436 articles, with 32 meeting the inclusion criteria. These contained 30 trials that reported uptake rates within subpopulations and 17 trials that combined interventions. Most differences in intervention effects between subpopulations were nonsignificant. Combining interventions led to greater participation, RR = 1.06, confidence interval [1.03; 1.10]. As interventions rarely affect subpopulations differently, targeting them at specific subpopulations may be an ineffective strategy. While individual interventions show modest effects, these results indicate that future programs might overcome this by combining interventions together. Care is needed when selecting interventions to combine as adding some interventions (e.g., additional print materials) can reduce the effectiveness of a combined strategy. Future research should examine methods for effectively combining interventions in nationwide programs to maximize participation.
引用
收藏
页码:384 / 393
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
AIHW, 2013, HLTH SYST EXP CANC O
[2]  
AIHW, 2018, National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: Monitoring Report 2018
[3]  
[Anonymous], COMP ESTIMATES INDEP
[4]   Tailored interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes [J].
Baker, Richard ;
Camosso-Stefinovic, Janette ;
Gillies, Clare ;
Shaw, Elizabeth J. ;
Cheater, Francine ;
Flottorp, Signe ;
Robertson, Noelle .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2010, (03)
[5]   GP participation in increasing uptake in a national bowel cancer screening programme: the PEARL project [J].
Benton, Sally C. ;
Butler, Piers ;
Allen, Katy ;
Chesters, Michelle ;
Rickard, Sally ;
Stanley, Sally ;
Roope, Richard ;
Vulkan, Daniel ;
Duffy, Stephen W. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 116 (12) :1551-1557
[6]   Gender-specific cut-offs in colorectal cancer screening with FIT: Increased compliance and equal positivity rate [J].
Blom, Johannes ;
Lowbeer, Christian ;
Elfstrom, K. Miriam ;
Sventelius, Marika ;
Ohman, Daniel ;
Saraste, Deborah ;
Tornberg, Sven .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2019, 26 (02) :92-97
[7]  
Borenstein M., 2021, INTRO METAANALYSIS
[8]  
Bray F, 2018, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V68, P394, DOI [10.3322/caac.21609, 10.3322/caac.21492]
[9]   An advance notification letter increases participation in colorectal cancer screening [J].
Cole, S. R. ;
Smith, A. ;
Wilson, C. ;
Turnbull, D. ;
Esterman, A. ;
Young, G. P. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2007, 14 (02) :73-75
[10]   A randomised trial of the impact of new faecal haemoglobin test technologies on population participation in screening for colorectal cancer [J].
Cole, SR ;
Young, GP ;
Esterman, A ;
Cadd, B ;
Morcom, J .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2003, 10 (03) :117-122