Comparison of Learning Programming between Interactive Computer Tutors and Human Teachers

被引:13
作者
Shen, Ruiqi [1 ]
Wohn, Donghee Yvette [1 ]
Lee, Michael J. [1 ]
机构
[1] New Jersey Inst Technol, Newark, NJ 07102 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACM CONFERENCE ON GLOBAL COMPUTING EDUCATION (COMPED '19) | 2019年
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Tutors; interactive computing tutors; student perspectives; computing education; teachers; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SAMPLE-SIZE;
D O I
10.1145/3300115.3309506
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
People typically learn programming from teachers in in-person courses or online tutorials. Interactive computer tutors-systems that deliver learning content interactively-have become more prevalent in online settings for teaching skills such as computer programming. Research has shown the efficiency and effectiveness of learning programming from teachers, interactive computer tutors, and a combination of both. However, there is limited understanding of learners' comparative perspectives about their experience learning from these different resources. We conducted an exploratory study using semi-structured interviews, recruiting 20 participants that had experience learning programming from both teachers and interactive computer tutors. We identified factors that learners like and dislike from both learning methods and discussed the strengths and weaknesses of them. Based on our findings, we propose suggestions for designers of interactive computer tutors, and for programming educators.
引用
收藏
页码:2 / 8
页数:7
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Alario-Hoyos Carlos., 2016, Proceedings of the European Stakeholder Summit on Experiences and Best Practices in and Around MOOCs, EMOOCS, page, P319
[2]   THE AUTOMATED TUTORING OF INTRODUCTORY COMPUTER-PROGRAMMING [J].
ANDERSON, JR ;
SKWARECKI, E .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1986, 29 (09) :842-849
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, MOOCS OPEN ED IMPLIC
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, TUTOR QUANT METHODS, DOI DOI https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p023
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, P 10 ANN C INT COMPU
[6]   The place of inter-rater reliability in qualitative research: An empirical study [J].
Armstrong, D ;
Gosling, A ;
Weinman, J ;
Marteau, T .
SOCIOLOGY-THE JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 31 (03) :597-606
[7]  
Bloom B., 1984, ED RES, V13, P6, DOI DOI https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X013006004
[8]   Coding In-depth Semistructured Interviews: Problems of Unitization and Intercoder Reliability and Agreement [J].
Campbell, John L. ;
Quincy, Charles ;
Osserman, Jordan ;
Pedersen, Ove K. .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 2013, 42 (03) :294-320
[9]  
COHEN PA, 1982, AM EDUC RES J, V19, P237, DOI 10.3102/00028312019002237
[10]  
Daku Brian LF, 2000, FRONT ED C FIE, V2