Examining Project Commitment in Cross-Functional Teams: Antecedents and Relationship with Team Performance

被引:31
作者
Ehrhardt, Kyle [1 ]
Miller, Janice S. [1 ]
Freeman, Sarah J. [1 ]
Hom, Peter W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Sheldon B Lubar Sch Business, Milwaukee, WI 53211 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, WP Carey Sch Business, Tempe, AZ USA
关键词
Cross-functional teams; Project commitment; Signaling theory; New product teams; Team performance; Product development teams; Team goal commitment; GOAL COMMITMENT; SIGNALING THEORY; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; SELF-MANAGEMENT; FAULTLINES; COHESION; LEADERSHIP; DIVERSITY; IMPACT; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10869-013-9325-6
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to test a model positing both antecedents and consequences of project commitment for members of cross-functional teams. Signaling theory and previous research guided study hypotheses. We collected primary data from 142 team members and 31 team leaders across 24 cross-functional product development teams nested within six manufacturing organizations in the US and Canada. Findings suggest that project commitment among team members is an important driver of team performance as rated by the team leader. In addition, several factors contribute toward shaping project commitment among cross-functional team members, including team leaders' encouragement of self-expectation, as well as team members' perceptions of an organization's support for the team project. Cross-functional teams are often charged with completing projects critical to the profitability, growth, and even survival of a firm. Especially as we show that members' project commitment is a meaningful predictor of team performance, managers may draw insight from study results as to what actions may be taken to promote the development of this important psychological state among members of cross-functional teams. Use of cross-functional teams for accomplishing a wide variety of firm objectives is becoming commonplace in organizations. Although theorized as an important construct in cross-functional team settings, empirical examinations of the nature and implications of project commitment have been limited. By examining both antecedents and potential team performance consequences of project commitment in multiple organizations, we contribute toward filling this gap.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 461
页数:19
相关论文
共 120 条
[51]   The Accuracy of Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling With Pseudobalanced Groups and Small Samples [J].
Hox, Joop J. ;
Maas, Cora J. M. .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2001, 8 (02) :157-174
[52]   Cross-Functional Team Selection Concerning Members' Cooperative Effects and Capabilities Overlap [J].
Hsieh, Ping Jung .
SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2010, 27 (03) :301-318
[53]   Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives [J].
Hu, Li-tze ;
Bentler, Peter M. .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 1999, 6 (01) :1-55
[54]  
Jassawalla A.R., 2001, Engineering Management Journal, V13, P33
[55]   Getting Everyone on Board: The Role of Inspirational Leadership in Geographically Dispersed Teams [J].
Joshi, Aparna ;
Lazarova, Mila B. ;
Liao, Hui .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (01) :240-252
[56]  
Kang E, 2008, ACAD MANAGE J, V51, P537
[57]   Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment [J].
Kirkman, BL ;
Rosen, B .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1999, 42 (01) :58-74
[58]   No pain, no gain: A critical review of the literature on signaling unobservable product quality [J].
Kirmani, A ;
Rao, AR .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2000, 64 (02) :66-79
[59]   2 INVESTIGATIONS OF THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG GROUP GOALS, GOAL COMMITMENT, COHESION, AND PERFORMANCE [J].
KLEIN, HJ ;
MULVEY, PW .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1995, 61 (01) :44-53
[60]   Goal commitment and the goal-setting process: Conceptual clarification and empirical synthesis [J].
Klein, HJ ;
Wesson, MJ ;
Hollenbeck, JR ;
Alge, BJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 84 (06) :885-896