Effect of chemical composition of PM2.5 on visibility in Guangzhou, China, 2007 spring

被引:140
作者
Tao, Jun [1 ,2 ]
Ho, Kin-Fai [2 ]
Chen, Laiguo
Zhu, Lihua
Han, Jinglei
Xu, Zhencheng
机构
[1] MEP, S China Inst Environm Sci, SEPA, Guangzhou 510655, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Visibility; PM2.5; Carbonaceous aerosols; Water-soluble ions; FINE PARTICULATE MATTER; UNITED-STATES; AEROSOL; REGION; URBAN; DEGRADATION; IMPAIRMENT; AREAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.partic.2008.11.002
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The object of this study was to investigate the correlation of visibility with chemical composition Of PM2.5 in Guangzhou. In April 2007, 28 PM2.5 samples were collected daily at the monitoring station of the South China Institute of Environmental Sciences (SCIES), in urban Guangzhou. Water-soluble ionic species (Cl-, NO3-, SO42-, NH4+, K+, Na+, Ca2+, and Mg2+,) and carbonaceous contents (OC and EC) of the PM2.5 samples were determined to characterize their impact on visibility impairment. The results showed that sulfate was the dominant species that affected both light scattering and visibility. The average percentage contributions of the visibility-degrading species to light scattering coefficient were 40% for sulfate, 16% for nitrate, 22% for organics, and 22% for elemental carbon. Because of its foremost effect on visibility, sulfate reduction in PM2.5 would effectively improve the visibility of Guangzhou. (C) 2008 Chinese Society of Particuology and Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 75
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Chemical Composition of PM2.5 and its Impact on Visibility in Guangzhou, Southern China
    Chen, Weihua
    Wang, Xuemei
    Zhou, Shengzhen
    Cohen, Jason Blake
    Zhang, Jinpu
    Wang, Yu
    Chang, Ming
    Zeng, Yanjun
    Liu, Yexin
    Ling, Zhenhao
    Liang, Guixiong
    Qiu, Xiaonuan
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2016, 16 (10) : 2349 - 2361
  • [3] Source apportionment of PM2.5 and visibility in Jinan, China
    Cheng, Mengtian
    Tang, Guiqian
    Lv, Bo
    Li, Xingru
    Wu, Xinrui
    Wang, Yiming
    Wang, Yuesi
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2021, 102 : 207 - 215
  • [4] Effect of PM2.5 chemical constituents on atmospheric visibility impairment
    Khanna, Isha
    Khare, Mukesh
    Gargava, Prashant
    Khan, Anwar Ali
    JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2018, 68 (05) : 430 - 437
  • [5] Chemical composition of PM2.5 at an urban site of Chengdu in southwestern China
    Tao Jun
    Cheng Tiantao
    Zhang Renjian
    Cao Junji
    Zhu Lihua
    Wang Qiyuan
    Luo Lei
    Zhang Leiming
    ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2013, 30 (04) : 1070 - 1084
  • [6] Effects of Chemical Composition of PM2.5 on Visibility in a Semi-rural City of Sichuan Basin
    Li, Yun-Chun
    Shu, Man
    Ho, Steven Sai Hang
    Yu, Jian-Zhen
    Yuan, Zi-Bing
    Liu, Zi-Fang
    Wang, Xian-Xiang
    Zhao, Xiao-Qing
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2018, 18 (04) : 957 - 968
  • [7] Chemical composition of PM2.5 during winter in Tianjin, China
    Gu, Jinxia
    Bai, Zhipeng
    Li, Weifang
    Wu, Liping
    Liu, Aixia
    Dong, Haiyan
    Xie, Yiyang
    PARTICUOLOGY, 2011, 9 (03) : 215 - 221
  • [8] PM2.5 in an industrial district of Zhengzhou, China: Chemical composition and source apportionment
    Geng, Ningbo
    Wang, Jia
    Xu, Yifei
    Zhang, Wending
    Chen, Chun
    Zhang, Ruiqin
    PARTICUOLOGY, 2013, 11 (01) : 99 - 109
  • [9] Reconstructed Light Extinction Coefficients Using Chemical Compositions of PM2.5 in Winter in Urban Guangzhou, China
    Tao Jun
    Cao Jun-Ji
    Zhang Ren-Jian
    Zhu Lihua
    Zhang Tao
    Shi Si
    Chan Chuen-Yu
    ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2012, 29 (02) : 359 - 368
  • [10] Recent Developments in the Determination of PM2.5 Chemical Composition
    Pan, Susu
    Qiu, Yanting
    Li, Ming
    Yang, Zhenqi
    Liang, Dapeng
    BULLETIN OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY, 2022, 108 (05) : 819 - 823