Aeroelastic Flutter Prediction Using Multifidelity Modeling of the Generalized Aerodynamic Influence Coefficients

被引:7
作者
Thelen, Andrew [1 ,2 ]
Leifsson, Leifur [3 ]
Beran, Philip [4 ]
机构
[1] US Air Force, Res Lab, Dept Aerosp Engn & Pathways Intern, Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[3] Iowa State Univ, Dept Aerosp Engn, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[4] US Air Force, Res Lab, Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433 USA
关键词
INSTABILITY SEARCHES; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.2514/1.J059208
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
This work proposes a multifidelity modeling approach for predicting aeroelastic flutter of airfoils and wings. Using aerodynamic models based on the doublet-lattice method and time-accurate Euler equations, cokriging-based surrogates of the generalized aerodynamic influence coefficients are generated as functions of Mach number and reduced frequency. The surrogate-based matrix terms are then used in the p-k method to determine flow conditions at flutter onset. To demonstrate the multifidelity process, a widely used pitching and plunging airfoil case is considered. Verification of the approach is done by comparing with results from a mode-based time-domain aeroelastic solver, as well as data from the literature. The approach draws inspiration from Timme et al., but focuses more on widely used industry tools (namely, the p-k method, panel-based aerodynamics, and time-domain computational fluid dynamics). The benefit of using multiple aerodynamic fidelities, rather than high-fidelity kriging models, is also quantified by examining a flutter speed error metric as the number of high-fidelity samples is varied.
引用
收藏
页码:4764 / 4780
页数:17
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Alexandrov N. M., 1999, CR1999209826 NASA
[2]   A trust-region framework for managing the use of approximation models in optimization [J].
Alexandrov, NM ;
Dennis, JE ;
Lewis, RM ;
Torczon, V .
STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION, 1998, 15 (01) :16-23
[3]  
Alonso J., 1994, 32 AEROSPACE SCI M, DOI [10.2514/6.1994-56, DOI 10.2514/6.1994-56]
[4]   Transonic aeroelastic simulation for instability searches and uncertainty analysis [J].
Badcock, K. J. ;
Timme, S. ;
Marques, S. ;
Khodaparast, H. ;
Prandina, M. ;
Mottershead, J. E. ;
Swift, A. ;
Da Ronch, A. ;
Woodgate, M. A. .
PROGRESS IN AEROSPACE SCIENCES, 2011, 47 (05) :392-423
[5]   Flexible aircraft gust encounter simulation using subspace projection model reduction [J].
Bekemeyer, P. ;
Timme, S. .
AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 86 :805-817
[6]  
Beran P., 2001, 39 AER SCI M EXH JAN, DOI [10.2514/6.2001-853, DOI 10.2514/6.2001-85]
[7]  
Bhatia M., 2014, 55 AIAA ASME ASCE AH, DOI [10.2514/6.2014-0336, DOI 10.2514/6.2014-0336]
[8]   h-Adaptive Stabilized Finite-Element Solver for Calculation of Generalized Aerodynamic Forces [J].
Bhatia, Manav ;
Beran, Philip .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2015, 53 (03) :554-572
[9]  
Biedron R. T., 2017, TM2017219661 NASA
[10]  
Coirier W. C., 1991, 10 COMP FLUID DYN C, DOI 10.2514/6.1991-1566