Insights into affinity and specificity in the complexes of α-lytic protease and its inhibitor proteins: binding free energy from molecular dynamics simulation

被引:17
作者
Deng, Nan-Jie [1 ]
Cieplak, Piotr [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Life Sci, Hefei 230027, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Burnham Inst Med Res, La Jolla, CA 92037 USA
关键词
ELECTROSTATIC INTERACTIONS; CONTINUUM SOLVENT; EGLIN-C; DECOMPOSITION; ASSOCIATION; MECHANICS; SOLVATION; STABILITY; RNA;
D O I
10.1039/b820961h
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We report the binding free energy calculation and its decomposition for the complexes of alpha-lytic protease and its protein inhibitors using molecular dynamics simulation. Standard mechanism serine protease inhibitors eglin C and OMTKY3 are known to have strong binding affinity for many serine proteases. Their binding loops have significant similarities, including a common P1 Leu as the main anchor in the binding interface. However, recent experiments demonstrate that the two inhibitors have vastly different affinity towards alpha-lytic protease (ALP), a bacterial serine protease. OMTKY3 inhibits the enzyme much more weakly (by similar to 10(6) times) than eglin C. Moreover, a variant of OMTKY3 with five mutations, OMTKY3M, has been shown to inhibit 10(4) times more strongly than the wild-type inhibitor. The underlying mechanisms for the unusually large difference in binding affinities and the effect of mutation are not well understood. Here we use molecular dynamics simulation with molecular mechanics-Poisson Boltzmann/surface area method (MM-PB/SA) to investigate quantitatively the binding specificity. The calculated absolute binding free energies correctly differentiate the thermodynamic stabilities of these protein complexes, but the magnitudes of the binding affinities are systematically overestimated. Analysis of the binding free energy components provides insights into the molecular mechanism of binding specificity. The large Delta Delta G(bind) between eglin C and wild type OMTKY3 towards ALP is mainly attributable to the stronger nonpolar interactions in the ALP-eglin C complex, arising from a higher degree of structural complementarity. Here the electrostatic interaction contributes to a lesser extent. The enhanced inhibition in the penta-mutant OMTKY3M over its wild type is entirely due to an overall improvement in the solvent-mediated electrostatic interactions in the ALP-OMTKY3M complex. The results suggest that for these protein-complexes and similar enzyme-inhibitor systems (1) the binding is driven by nonpolar interactions, opposed by overall electrostatic and solute entropy contributions; (2) binding specificity can be tuned by improving the complementarity in electrostatics between two associating proteins. Binding free energy decomposition into contributions from individual protein residues provides additional detailed information on the structural determinants and subtle conformational changes responsible for the binding specificity.
引用
收藏
页码:4968 / 4981
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[11]  
Gohlke H, 2004, J COMPUT CHEM, V25, P238, DOI [10.1002/jcc.10379, 10.1022/jcc.10379]
[12]   Insights into protein-protein binding by binding free energy calculation and free energy decomposition for the Ras-Raf and Ras-RaIGDS complexes [J].
Gohlke, H ;
Kiel, C ;
Case, DA .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2003, 330 (04) :891-913
[13]   Electrostatic interactions in the GCN4 leucine zipper: Substantial contributions arise from intramolecular interactions enhanced on binding [J].
Hendsch, ZS ;
Tidor, B .
PROTEIN SCIENCE, 1999, 8 (07) :1381-1392
[14]   COMPARISON OF SIMPLE POTENTIAL FUNCTIONS FOR SIMULATING LIQUID WATER [J].
JORGENSEN, WL ;
CHANDRASEKHAR, J ;
MADURA, JD ;
IMPEY, RW ;
KLEIN, ML .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1983, 79 (02) :926-935
[15]   Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: Combining molecular mechanics and continuum models [J].
Kollman, PA ;
Massova, I ;
Reyes, C ;
Kuhn, B ;
Huo, SH ;
Chong, L ;
Lee, M ;
Lee, T ;
Duan, Y ;
Wang, W ;
Donini, O ;
Cieplak, P ;
Srinivasan, J ;
Case, DA ;
Cheatham, TE .
ACCOUNTS OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH, 2000, 33 (12) :889-897
[16]  
Lazaridis T, 1999, PROTEINS, V35, P133, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19990501)35:2<133::AID-PROT1>3.0.CO
[17]  
2-N
[18]   Calculation of absolute protein-ligand binding affinity using path and endpoint approaches [J].
Lee, MS ;
Olson, MA .
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 90 (03) :864-877
[19]   RDOCK: Refinement of rigid-body protein docking predictions [J].
Li, L ;
Chen, R ;
Weng, ZP .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2003, 53 (03) :693-707
[20]   KINETIC AND STRUCTURAL CHARACTERIZATION OF MUTATIONS OF GLYCINE-216 IN ALPHA-LYTIC PROTEASE - A NEW TARGET FOR ENGINEERING SUBSTRATE-SPECIFICITY [J].
MACE, JE ;
AGARD, DA .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1995, 254 (04) :720-736