A comparison study of the yield surface exponent of the Barlat yield function on the forming limit curve prediction of zirconium alloys with M-K method

被引:12
作者
Lei, Congyi [1 ,2 ]
Mao, Jianzhong [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Xiaomin [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Jingxuan [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Lian [3 ]
Chen, Ding [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] State Key Lab Adv Design & Mfg Vehicle Body, Changsha 410082, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Univ, Coll Mech & Vehicle Engineer, Changsha 410082, Peoples R China
[3] State Nucl Bao Ti Zirconium Ind Co, Baoji 721000, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Zirconium alloys; FLC prediction; Yield criterion; Yield surface exponent; Barlat yield function; M-K method; Strain path; SHEET METALS; CRITERION; PLASTICITY; TEXTURE;
D O I
10.1007/s12289-021-01616-w
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The forming limit curve (FLC) of zirconium alloys plays a significant role in the fabrications of spacer grid used for nuclear fuel assembly. The theoretical prediction of FLC has provided a convenient method to calculate the strain limit during the sheet forming process, but the prediction accuracy of zirconium alloy is still unsatisfactory due to its close-packed-hexagonal (HCP) structure. In this paper, to find a suitable yield surface exponent of zirconium alloys for improving the prediction accuracy, the theoretical FLCs of SZA6 zirconium alloy were calculated by self-programmed numerical codes with different exponent values and the results were compared with the experiments. To explain the mechanism of how the yield surface exponent affects the plastic behavior of SZA6 zirconium alloy, the strain distributions and element strain paths of Nakajima test were analyzed by finite element methods. At last, a suggested value of the yield surface exponent suitable for the FLC prediction of this zirconium alloy is acquired.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 484
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]  
Marciniak Z., 1967, INT J MECH SCI, V9, P609, DOI DOI 10.1016/0020-7403(67)90066-5
[42]  
MORRISON WB, 1968, ASM TRANS Q, V61, P423
[43]   Prediction of forming limit curves for nonlinear loading paths using quadratic and non-quadratic yield criteria and variable imperfection factor [J].
Nurcheshmeh, Morteza ;
Green, Daniel E. .
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2016, 91 :248-255
[44]   BBC05 with non-integer exponent and ambiguities in Nakajima yield surface calibration [J].
Pilthammar, Johan ;
Banabic, Dorel ;
Sigvant, Mats .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MATERIAL FORMING, 2021, 14 (04) :577-592
[45]   Anisotropic yield function of hexagonal materials taking into account texture development and anisotropic hardening [J].
Plunkett, B. ;
Lebensohn, R. A. ;
Cazacu, O. ;
Barlat, F. .
ACTA MATERIALIA, 2006, 54 (16) :4159-4169
[46]   PLASTIC INSTABILITY UNDER PLANE STRESS [J].
SWIFT, HW .
JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICS AND PHYSICS OF SOLIDS, 1952, 1 (01) :1-18
[47]  
Vasnin A. M., 1974, Strength of Materials, V6, P1535, DOI 10.1007/BF01529841
[48]   Yield loci of FCC and BCC sheet metals [J].
VialEdwards, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLASTICITY, 1997, 13 (05) :521-531
[49]   The inverse parameter identification of Hill 48 yield criterion and its verification in press bending and roll forming process simulations [J].
Yan, Yu ;
Wang, Haibo ;
Li, Qiang .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2015, 20 :46-53
[50]  
2016, MULTISCALE MODELLING, P1