Evaluation of peanut genotypes for resistance to Tomato spotted wilt virus by mechanical and thrips inoculation

被引:10
|
作者
do Nascimento, Luciana Cordeiro [1 ]
Pensuk, Viboon
da Costa, Nivania Pereira
de Assis Filho, Francisco Miguel
Pio-Ribeiro, Gilvan
Deom, Carl Michael
Sherwood, John
机构
[1] Univ Fed Paraiba, Dept Fitotecn, BR-58397000 Areia, PB, Brazil
[2] Udonthani Rajabhat Univ, Dept Technol, Muang 41000, Udonthani, Thailand
[3] Agdia Inc, Elkhart, IN 46514 USA
[4] Univ Fed Pernambuco, Dept Agron, BR-52171900 Recife, PE, Brazil
[5] Univ Georgia, Dept Plant Pathol, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
Arachis hypogaea; TSWV; mechanical transmission; thrips transmission;
D O I
10.1590/S0100-204X2006000600006
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The objective of this work was to evaluate the reactions of three peanut breeding lines (IC-10, IC-34, and ICGV 86388) to Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) by mechanical and thrips inoculation, under greenhouse conditions, and compare them to the reactions of cultivars SunOleic, Georgia Green, and the breeding line C11-2-39. TSWV infection by mechanical inoculation was visually assessed using an index ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (apical death). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to confirm TSWV infection from both mechanical and thrips inoculations. IC-10, IC-34, ICGV 86388, and C11-2-39 were more resistant than the cultivars SunOleic and Georgia Green based on mechanical inoculation. Upon thrips inoculation only IC-34 and ICGV 86388 were infected by TSWV, as demonstrated by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), although no symptoms of infection were observed. The peanut breeding lines IC-10, IC-34, and ICGV 86388 show higher level of resistance to TSWV than cultivar Georgia Green considered a standard for TSWV resistance.
引用
收藏
页码:937 / 942
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] RESISTANCE TO TOMATO SPOTTED WILT VIRUS IN TRANSGENIC TOMATO HYBRIDS
    ULTZEN, T
    GIELEN, J
    VENEMA, F
    WESTERBROEK, A
    DEHAAN, P
    TAN, ML
    SCHRAM, A
    VANGRINSVEN, M
    GOLDBACH, R
    EUPHYTICA, 1995, 85 (1-3) : 159 - 168
  • [42] Resistance to tomato spotted wilt virus in transgenic tomato varieties
    Stoeva, P
    Hristova, D
    Donkova, P
    Petrova, M
    Gorinova, N
    Yankulova, M
    Inze, D
    van Kamp, W
    Atanassov, A
    PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY AND IN VITRO BIOLOGY IN THE 21ST CENTURY, 1999, 36 : 549 - 552
  • [43] Pathogenesis of tomato spotted wilt virus in peanut plants dually infected with peanut mottle virus
    Hoffmann, K
    Geske, SM
    Moyer, JW
    PLANT DISEASE, 1998, 82 (06) : 610 - 614
  • [44] Engineered resistance to tomato spotted wilt virus in transgenic peanut expressing the viral nucleocapsid gene
    Zhijian Li
    Robert L. Jarret
    James W. Demski
    Transgenic Research, 1997, 6 : 297 - 305
  • [45] Engineered resistance to tomato spotted wilt virus in transgenic peanut expressing the viral nucleocapsid gene
    Li, ZJ
    Jarret, RL
    Demski, JW
    TRANSGENIC RESEARCH, 1997, 6 (04) : 297 - 305
  • [46] Effect of Spinosad Resistance on Transmission of Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus by the Western Flower Thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae)
    Zhao, Weiwei
    Wan, Yanran
    Xie, Wen
    Xu, Baoyun
    Zhang, Youjun
    Wang, Shaoli
    Wei, Guoshu
    Zhou, Xiaomao
    Wu, Qingjun
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY, 2016, 109 (01) : 62 - 69
  • [47] ASSOCIATION OF TOMATO SPOTTED WILT VIRUS WITH FOLIAR CHLOROSIS OF PEANUT IN GEORGIA
    CULBREATH, AK
    CSINOS, AS
    BRENNEMAN, TB
    DEMSKI, JW
    TODD, JW
    PLANT DISEASE, 1991, 75 (08) : 863 - 863
  • [48] Characterization of novel thrips vector proteins that bind to tomato spotted wilt virus
    Chen, Y.
    Badillo-Vargas, I. E.
    Martin, K.
    Rotenberg, D.
    Whitfield, A. E.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2019, 109 (10) : 1 - 1
  • [49] IDENTIFICATION OF RESISTANCE TO TOMATO SPOTTED WILT VIRUS IN LETTUCE
    WANG, M
    CHO, JJ
    PLANT DISEASE, 1992, 76 (06) : 642 - 642
  • [50] Binding of tomato spotted wilt virus to a 94-kDa thrips protein
    Kikkert, M
    Meurs, C
    van de Wetering, F
    Dorfmüller, S
    Peters, D
    Kormelink, R
    Goldbach, R
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1998, 88 (01) : 63 - 69