Evaluation of peanut genotypes for resistance to Tomato spotted wilt virus by mechanical and thrips inoculation

被引:10
作者
do Nascimento, Luciana Cordeiro [1 ]
Pensuk, Viboon
da Costa, Nivania Pereira
de Assis Filho, Francisco Miguel
Pio-Ribeiro, Gilvan
Deom, Carl Michael
Sherwood, John
机构
[1] Univ Fed Paraiba, Dept Fitotecn, BR-58397000 Areia, PB, Brazil
[2] Udonthani Rajabhat Univ, Dept Technol, Muang 41000, Udonthani, Thailand
[3] Agdia Inc, Elkhart, IN 46514 USA
[4] Univ Fed Pernambuco, Dept Agron, BR-52171900 Recife, PE, Brazil
[5] Univ Georgia, Dept Plant Pathol, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
Arachis hypogaea; TSWV; mechanical transmission; thrips transmission;
D O I
10.1590/S0100-204X2006000600006
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The objective of this work was to evaluate the reactions of three peanut breeding lines (IC-10, IC-34, and ICGV 86388) to Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) by mechanical and thrips inoculation, under greenhouse conditions, and compare them to the reactions of cultivars SunOleic, Georgia Green, and the breeding line C11-2-39. TSWV infection by mechanical inoculation was visually assessed using an index ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (apical death). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to confirm TSWV infection from both mechanical and thrips inoculations. IC-10, IC-34, ICGV 86388, and C11-2-39 were more resistant than the cultivars SunOleic and Georgia Green based on mechanical inoculation. Upon thrips inoculation only IC-34 and ICGV 86388 were infected by TSWV, as demonstrated by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), although no symptoms of infection were observed. The peanut breeding lines IC-10, IC-34, and ICGV 86388 show higher level of resistance to TSWV than cultivar Georgia Green considered a standard for TSWV resistance.
引用
收藏
页码:937 / 942
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
AMIN PW, 1985, PLANT DIS, V69, P718
[2]  
Brittlebank CC, 1919, Journal of Agriculture Victoria, V17, P231
[3]  
Brown S., 2003, B U GEORGIA, V1165
[4]  
Culbreath A. K., 2000, Peanut Science, V27, P35, DOI 10.3146/i0095-3679-27-1-8
[5]  
Culbreath A. K., 1999, Peanut Science, V26, P100, DOI 10.3146/i0095-3679-26-2-8
[6]   Epidemiology and management of tomato spotted wilt in peanut [J].
Culbreath, AK ;
Todd, JW ;
Brown, SL .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2003, 41 :53-75
[7]   EFFECT OF NEW PEANUT CULTIVAR GEORGIA BROWNE ON EPIDEMICS OF SPOTTED WILT [J].
CULBREATH, AK ;
TODD, JW ;
BRANCH, WD ;
BROWN, SL ;
DEMSKI, JW ;
BEASLEY, JP .
PLANT DISEASE, 1994, 78 (12) :1185-1189
[8]   DISEASE PROGRESS OF SPOTTED WILT IN PEANUT CULTIVARS FLORUNNER AND SOUTHERN RUNNER [J].
CULBREATH, AK ;
TODD, JW ;
DEMSKI, JW ;
CHAMBERLIN, JR .
PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1992, 82 (07) :766-771
[9]   Disease progress of tomato spotted wilt virus in selected peanut cultivars and advanced breeding lines [J].
Culbreath, AK ;
Todd, JW ;
Gorbet, DW ;
Branch, WD ;
Sprenkel, RK ;
Shokes, FM ;
Demski, JW .
PLANT DISEASE, 1996, 80 (01) :70-73
[10]   Dynamics of Tomato spotted wilt virus replication in the alimentary canal of two thrips species [J].
de Assis, FM ;
Naidu, RA ;
Deom, CM ;
Sherwood, JL .
PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2002, 92 (07) :729-733