Observer performance in the localization of tubes and catheters on digital chest images: The role of expertise and image enhancement

被引:12
作者
Nodine, CF
Liu, H
Miller, WT
Kundel, HL
机构
[1] Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Medical School, Philadelphia
关键词
localization variability; tube and catheter position; interrater reliability; automatic image-processing algorithm; computed radiography images;
D O I
10.1016/S1076-6332(96)80273-X
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives. To determine whether observer performance in the localization of tubes and catheters on computed radiography (CR) chest images can be improved by using an automatic image-processing algorithm. Methods. Comparisons were made of CR hard-copy, CR soft-copy, and CR enhanced soft-copy images obtained with an image-processing algorithm. The enhanced images used gray-level optimization and nonlinear unsharp masking to emphasize the edges of the devices. Chest radiologists (n = 4), general radiologists (n = 4), and interns (n = 6) read 45 images that contained endotracheal tubes, pulmonary artery catheters, and central venous catheters. Results. Chest radiologists had the smallest mean interobserver localization variability (4 mm), followed by general radiologists (6 mm) and interns (8 mm). Localization variability was greatest for hard-copy images and least for enhanced soft-copy images. Conclusion. Use of an automatic imaging-processing algorithm reduced localization variability and enabled the medical interns to perform at approximately the same level as the chest radiologists.
引用
收藏
页码:834 / 841
页数:8
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   HIGH-RESOLUTION COMPUTER DISPLAY OF PORTABLE, DIGITAL, CHEST RADIOGRAPHS OF ADULTS - SUITABILITY FOR PRIMARY INTERPRETATION [J].
FRANK, MS ;
JOST, RG ;
MOLINA, PL ;
ANDERSON, DJ ;
SOLOMON, SL ;
WHITMAN, RA ;
MOORE, SM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1993, 160 (03) :473-477
[2]   PORTABLE CHEST RADIOGRAPHY IN INTENSIVE-CARE - A COMPARISON OF COMPUTED AND CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHY [J].
JENNINGS, P ;
PADLEY, SPG ;
HANSELL, DM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1992, 65 (778) :852-856
[3]   RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC EVALUATION OF COMPUTER DISPLAY OF ADULT PORTABLE CHEST RADIOGRAPHS [J].
KRUPINSKI, EA ;
MALONEY, K ;
BESSEN, SC ;
CAPP, MP ;
GRAHAM, K ;
HUNT, R ;
LUND, P ;
OVITT, T ;
STANDEN, JR .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1994, 29 (02) :141-146
[4]   Prospective study of PACS: Information flow and clinical action in a medical intensive care unit [J].
Kundel, HL ;
Seshadri, SB ;
Langlotz, CP ;
Lanken, PN ;
Horii, SC ;
Nodine, CF ;
Polansky, M ;
Feingold, E ;
Brikman, I ;
Bozzo, M ;
Redfern, R .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 199 (01) :143-149
[5]  
LEHNIEN DL, 1985, MED PHYS, V12, P209
[6]  
MYERS JL, 1966, FUNDAMENTALS EXPT DE
[7]   MEASURING INTERRATER RELIABILITY AMONG MULTIPLE RATERS - AN EXAMPLE OF METHODS FOR NOMINAL DATA [J].
POSNER, KL ;
SAMPSON, PD ;
CAPLAN, RA ;
WARD, RJ ;
CHENEY, FW .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1990, 9 (09) :1103-1115
[8]   IMPROVED PARAMETERS FOR UNSHARP MASK FILTERING OF DIGITAL CHEST RADIOGRAPHS [J].
PROKOP, M ;
SCHAEFER, CM ;
OESTMANN, JW ;
GALANSKI, M .
RADIOLOGY, 1993, 187 (02) :521-526
[9]   COMPARING JOINT AGREEMENT OF SEVERAL RATERS WITH ANOTHER RATER [J].
WILLIAMS, GW .
BIOMETRICS, 1976, 32 (03) :619-627
[10]   DEVELOPMENT OF A HIGH-QUALITY FILM DUPLICATION SYSTEM USING A LASER DIGITIZER - COMPARISON WITH COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY [J].
YOSHIMURA, H ;
XU, XW ;
DOI, K ;
MACMAHON, H ;
HOFFMANN, KR ;
GIGER, ML ;
MONTNER, SM .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1993, 20 (01) :51-58