Evaluation of three techniques for detection of low-level methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA):: a disk diffusion method with cefoxitin and moxalactam, the Vitek 2 system, and the MRSA-screen latex agglutination test

被引:207
作者
Felten, A [1 ]
Grandry, B [1 ]
Lagrange, PH [1 ]
Casin, I [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop St Louis, Serv Bacteriol Virol Hyg, F-75475 Paris 10, France
关键词
D O I
10.1128/JCM.40.8.2766-2771.2002
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Very-low-level methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), or class 1 MRSA, is often misdiagnosed as methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). We evaluated the performances of three methods for detection of low-level methicillin resistance: the disk diffusion method using the cephamycin antibiotics cefoxitin and moxalactam, the Vitek 2 system (bioMerieux), and the MRSA-screen test (Denka). Detection of the mecA gene by PCR was considered to be the "gold standard." We also determined the sensitivity of the oxacillin disk diffusion method with 5- and 1-mug disks and that of the Oxascreen agar assay with 6 mg of oxacillin liter(-1) for detection of MRSA. We compared the distributions of MICs of oxacillin and cefoxitin by the E-test (AB Biodisk), and those of moxalactam by dilutions in agar, for MRSA and MSSA isolates. The 152 clinical isolates of S. aureus studied were divided into 69 MSSA (mecA-negative) and 83 MRSA (mecA-positive) isolates, including 63 heterogeneous isolates and 26 class I isolates (low-level resistance). The cefoxitin and moxalactam disk diffusion tests detected 100% of all the MRSA classes: cefoxitin inhibition zone diameters were < 27 mm, and moxalactam inhibition zone diameters were <24 mm. The Vitek 2 system and the MRSA-screen test detected 94 and 97.6% of all MRSA isolates, respectively. The sensitivities of the 5- and 1-mug oxacillin disks, were 95.2 and 96.4%, respectively, whereas that of the Oxascreen agar screen assay was 94%. All of the tests except the 1-mug oxacillin disk test were 100% specific. For the class 1 MRSA isolates, the sensitivity of the Vitek 2 test was 92.3%, whereas those of the MRSA-screen test and the disk diffusion method with cefoxitin and moxalactam were 100%. Therefore, the cefoxitin and moxalactam disk diffusion methods were the best-performing tests for routine detection of all classes of MRSA.
引用
收藏
页码:2766 / 2771
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Prevalence of nosocomial infections in France:: results of the nationwide survey in 1996
    Astagneau, P
    Branger, B
    Dumartin, C
    Gayet, S
    Lepoutre, A
    Parneix, P
    Savey, A
    Bientz, M
    Brücker, G
    Carlet, J
    Chaperon, J
    Lejeune, B
    Cullet, D
    Fabry, J
    Golliot, F
    Gulian, C
    Jacquelinet, C
    Labadie, JC
    Sartor, C
    Kadi, Z
    Gachie, JP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2000, 46 (03) : 186 - 193
  • [3] Unusual spread of a penicillin-susceptible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone in a geographic area of low incidence
    Blanc, DS
    Petignat, C
    Moreillon, P
    Entenza, JM
    Eisenring, MC
    Kleiber, H
    Wenger, A
    Troillet, N
    Blanc, CH
    Francioli, P
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1999, 29 (06) : 1512 - 1518
  • [4] Evaluation of MRSA-screen, a simple anti-PBP 2a slide latex agglutination kit, for rapid detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus
    Cavassini, M
    Wenger, A
    Jaton, K
    Blanc, DS
    Bille, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1999, 37 (05) : 1591 - 1594
  • [5] Methicillin resistance in staphylococci: Molecular and biochemical basis and clinical implications
    Chambers, HF
    [J]. CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS, 1997, 10 (04) : 781 - +
  • [6] BETA-LACTAM RESISTANCE MECHANISMS OF METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS
    FRANCIOLLI, M
    BILLE, J
    GLAUSER, MP
    MOREILLON, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1991, 163 (03) : 514 - 523
  • [7] Comparison of ATB Staph, Rapid ATB Staph, Vitek, and E-test methods for detection of oxacillin heteroresistance in staphylococci possessing mecA
    Frebourg, NB
    Nouet, D
    Lemée, L
    Martin, E
    Lemeland, JF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1998, 36 (01) : 52 - 57
  • [8] GALBART JO, 2000, J CLIN MICROBIOL, V38, P185
  • [9] Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in hospitalized adults and children without known risk factors
    Gorak, EJ
    Yamada, SM
    Brown, JD
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1999, 29 (04) : 797 - 800
  • [10] Penicillin-binding protein 4 overproduction increases beta-lactam resistance in Staphylococcus aureus
    Henze, UU
    BergerBachi, B
    [J]. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1996, 40 (09) : 2121 - 2125