Collaborative and partnership research for improvement of health and social services: researcher's experiences from 20 projects

被引:115
作者
Nystrom, M. E. [1 ,2 ]
Karltun, J. [3 ]
Keller, C. [4 ]
Gare, B. Andersson [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Med Management Ctr, Dept Learning Informat Management & Eth, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Umea Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Clin Med, Epidemiol & Global Hlth, SE-90187 Umea, Sweden
[3] Jonkoping Univ, Sch Engn, Dept Ind Engn & Management, POB 1026, SE-55111 Jonkoping, Sweden
[4] Jonkoping Univ, Jonkoping Int Business Sch, POB 1026, SE-55111 Jonkoping, Sweden
[5] Futurum, Jonkoping, Region Jonkopin, Sweden
[6] Jonkoping Univ, Jonkoping Acad Improvement Hlth & Welf, Sch Hlth Sci, POB 1026, SE-55111 Jonkoping, Sweden
来源
HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS | 2018年 / 16卷
关键词
Collaborative research; co-production; integrated knowledge translation; partnership research; quality improvement; healthcare; social services; KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER; IMPLEMENTATION; CHALLENGES; POLICY; CARE; TRANSLATION; GUIDELINES; EXCHANGE; FACILITATORS; INNOVATIONS;
D O I
10.1186/s12961-018-0322-0
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Getting research into policy and practice in healthcare is a recognised, world-wide concern. As an attempt to bridge the gap between research and practice, research funders are requesting more interdisciplinary and collaborative research, while actual experiences of such processes have been less studied. Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to gain more knowledge on the interdisciplinary, collaborative and partnership research process by investigating researchers' experiences of and approaches to the process, based on their participation in an inventive national research programme. The programme aimed to boost collaborative and partnership research and build learning structures, while improving ways to lead, manage and develop practices in Swedish health and social services. Methods: Interviews conducted with project leaders and/or lead researchers and documentation from 20 projects were analysed using directed and conventional content analysis. Results: Collaborative approaches were achieved by design, e.g. action research, or by involving practitioners from several levels of the healthcare system in various parts of the research process. The use of dual roles as researcher/ clinician or practitioner/PhD student or the use of education designed especially for practitioners or 'student researchers' were other approaches. The collaborative process constituted the area for the main lessons learned as well as the main problems. Difficulties concerned handling complexity and conflicts between different expectations and demands in the practitioner's and researcher's contexts, and dealing with human resource issues and group interactions when forming collaborative and interdisciplinary research teams. The handling of such challenges required time, resources, knowledge, interactive learning and skilled project management. Conclusions: Collaborative approaches are important in the study of complex phenomena. Results from this study show that allocated time, arenas for interactions and skills in project management and communication are needed during research collaboration to ensure support and build trust and understanding with involved practitioners at several levels in the healthcare system. For researchers, dealing with this complexity takes time and energy from the scientific process. For practitioners, this puts demands on understanding a research process and how it fits with ongoing organisational agendas and activities and allocating time. Some of the identified factors may be overlooked by funders and involved stakeholders when designing, performing and evaluating interdisciplinary, collaborative and partnership research.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 73 条
  • [41] Partnerships for knowledge exchange in health services research, policy and practice
    Mitchell, Penelope
    Pirkis, Jane
    Hall, Jane
    Haas, Marion
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH & POLICY, 2009, 14 (02) : 104 - 111
  • [42] Knowledge transfer and exchange: Review and synthesis of the literature
    Mitton, Craig
    Adair, Carol E.
    Mckenzie, Emily
    Patten, Scott B.
    Perry, Brenda Waye
    [J]. MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2007, 85 (04) : 729 - 768
  • [43] Practice facilitators and practice-based research networks
    Nagykaldi, Zsolt
    Mold, James W.
    Robinson, Amanda
    Niebauer, Linda
    Ford, Ann
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2006, 19 (05) : 506 - 510
  • [44] Locally based research and development units as knowledge brokers and change facilitators in health and social care of older people in Sweden
    Nystrom, Monica Elisabeth
    Hansson, Johan
    Garvare, Rickard
    Andersson-Back, Monica
    [J]. EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2015, 11 (01): : 57 - 80
  • [45] Change and learning strategies in large scale change programs Describing the variation of strategies used in a health promotion program
    Nystrom, Monica Elisabeth
    Hoog, Elisabet
    Garvare, Rickard
    Weinehall, Lars
    Ivarsson, Anneli
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT, 2013, 26 (06) : 1020 - 1044
  • [46] Facilitating implementation of the translational research pipeline in neurological rehabilitation
    Oborn, Eivor
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY, 2012, 25 (06) : 676 - 681
  • [47] Guidance for research-practice partnerships (R-PPs) and collaborative research
    Ovretveit, John
    Hempel, Susanne
    Magnabosco, Jennifer L.
    Mittman, Brian S.
    Rubenstein, Lisa V.
    Ganz, David A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 28 (01) : 115 - 126
  • [48] Do reviews of healthcare interventions teach us how to improve healthcare systems?
    Pawson, Ray
    Greenhalgh, Joanne
    Brennan, Cathy
    Glidewell, Elizabeth
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2014, 114 : 129 - 137
  • [49] Women in interdisciplinary science: Exploring preferences and consequences
    Rhoten, Diana
    Pfirman, Stephanie
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2007, 36 (01) : 56 - 75
  • [50] Improving treatment of depression in primary health care: a case study of obstacles to perform a clinical trial designed to implement practice guidelines
    Richter-Sundberg, Linda
    Nystrom, Monica Elisabeth
    Krakau, Ingvar
    Sandahl, Christer
    [J]. PRIMARY HEALTH CARE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 16 (02) : 188 - 200