Collaborative and partnership research for improvement of health and social services: researcher's experiences from 20 projects

被引:115
作者
Nystrom, M. E. [1 ,2 ]
Karltun, J. [3 ]
Keller, C. [4 ]
Gare, B. Andersson [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Med Management Ctr, Dept Learning Informat Management & Eth, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Umea Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Clin Med, Epidemiol & Global Hlth, SE-90187 Umea, Sweden
[3] Jonkoping Univ, Sch Engn, Dept Ind Engn & Management, POB 1026, SE-55111 Jonkoping, Sweden
[4] Jonkoping Univ, Jonkoping Int Business Sch, POB 1026, SE-55111 Jonkoping, Sweden
[5] Futurum, Jonkoping, Region Jonkopin, Sweden
[6] Jonkoping Univ, Jonkoping Acad Improvement Hlth & Welf, Sch Hlth Sci, POB 1026, SE-55111 Jonkoping, Sweden
来源
HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS | 2018年 / 16卷
关键词
Collaborative research; co-production; integrated knowledge translation; partnership research; quality improvement; healthcare; social services; KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER; IMPLEMENTATION; CHALLENGES; POLICY; CARE; TRANSLATION; GUIDELINES; EXCHANGE; FACILITATORS; INNOVATIONS;
D O I
10.1186/s12961-018-0322-0
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Getting research into policy and practice in healthcare is a recognised, world-wide concern. As an attempt to bridge the gap between research and practice, research funders are requesting more interdisciplinary and collaborative research, while actual experiences of such processes have been less studied. Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to gain more knowledge on the interdisciplinary, collaborative and partnership research process by investigating researchers' experiences of and approaches to the process, based on their participation in an inventive national research programme. The programme aimed to boost collaborative and partnership research and build learning structures, while improving ways to lead, manage and develop practices in Swedish health and social services. Methods: Interviews conducted with project leaders and/or lead researchers and documentation from 20 projects were analysed using directed and conventional content analysis. Results: Collaborative approaches were achieved by design, e.g. action research, or by involving practitioners from several levels of the healthcare system in various parts of the research process. The use of dual roles as researcher/ clinician or practitioner/PhD student or the use of education designed especially for practitioners or 'student researchers' were other approaches. The collaborative process constituted the area for the main lessons learned as well as the main problems. Difficulties concerned handling complexity and conflicts between different expectations and demands in the practitioner's and researcher's contexts, and dealing with human resource issues and group interactions when forming collaborative and interdisciplinary research teams. The handling of such challenges required time, resources, knowledge, interactive learning and skilled project management. Conclusions: Collaborative approaches are important in the study of complex phenomena. Results from this study show that allocated time, arenas for interactions and skills in project management and communication are needed during research collaboration to ensure support and build trust and understanding with involved practitioners at several levels in the healthcare system. For researchers, dealing with this complexity takes time and energy from the scientific process. For practitioners, this puts demands on understanding a research process and how it fits with ongoing organisational agendas and activities and allocating time. Some of the identified factors may be overlooked by funders and involved stakeholders when designing, performing and evaluating interdisciplinary, collaborative and partnership research.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 73 条
  • [1] Aagaard Nielsen K., 2006, Action and interactive research: beyond practice and theory
  • [2] Illuminating the processes of knowledge transfer in nursing
    Aita, Marilyn
    Richer, Marie-Claire
    Heon, Marjolaine
    [J]. WORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING, 2007, 4 (03) : 146 - 155
  • [3] [Anonymous], KNOWL ACT KNOWL TRAN
  • [4] [Anonymous], KNOWLEDGE POLICY
  • [5] [Anonymous], KNOWL TRANSL HLTH
  • [6] [Anonymous], J CONTIN ED HLTH PRO
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2005, IMPLEMENTATION RES S
  • [8] Disseminating innovations in health care
    Berwick, DM
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 289 (15): : 1969 - 1975
  • [9] Assessing the impact of research on policy: a literature review
    Boaz, Annette
    Fitzpatrick, Siobhan
    Shaw, Ben
    [J]. SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2009, 36 (04) : 255 - 270
  • [10] Beyond "Two Cultures": Guidance for Establishing Effective Researcher/Health System Partnerships
    Bowen, Sarah
    Botting, Ingrid
    Graham, Ian D.
    Huebner, Lori-Anne
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 6 (01) : 27 - 42