Competition favors the prepared firm: Firms' R&D responses to competitive market pressure

被引:52
作者
Lee, Chang-Yang [1 ]
机构
[1] KAIST Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, KAIST Business Sch, Seoul 130868, South Korea
关键词
Technological competence; R&D response to competitive market pressure; TECHNOLOGICAL-OPPORTUNITY; PROCESS INNOVATION; PRODUCT; DETERMINANTS; INTENSITY; BEHAVIOR; EFFICIENCY; PARADIGMS; PATENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.005
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper aims to contribute to the literature on the long-debated relationship between market competition and firm research and development (R&D) by investigating the effect of competitive market pressure on firms' incentives to invest in R&D. The paper shows that a firm's R&D response to competitive market pressure depends primarily on its level of technological competence or R&D productivity: firms with high levels of technological competence tend to respond aggressively (i.e., exhibit a higher level of R&D efforts) to intensifying competitive market pressure, while firms with low levels of technological competence tend to respond submissively (i.e., exhibit a lower level of R&D efforts). The differential effect of competitive market pressure on firm R&D, conditioned primarily by the level of firms' technological competence, is empirically supported by unique firm-level data from the World Bank. Furthermore, the role of firm-specific technological competence in conditioning the R&D-competition relationship is more evident and statistically more significant for firms facing consumers whose utility is relatively more elastic to product quality than to price. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:861 / 870
页数:10
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Corporate governance, competition policy and industrial policy [J].
Aghion, P ;
Dewatripont, M ;
Rey, P .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1997, 41 (3-5) :797-805
[2]   Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship [J].
Aghion, P ;
Bloom, N ;
Blundell, R ;
Griffith, R ;
Howitt, P .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2005, 120 (02) :701-728
[3]  
Aghion P., 2000, 2462 CEPR
[4]  
AGHION P, 1999, 2052 CEPR
[5]  
Anderson SP., 1992, DISCRETE CHOICE THEO
[8]   DYNAMIC COUNT DATA MODELS OF TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION [J].
BLUNDELL, R ;
GRIFFITH, R ;
VANREENEN, J .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1995, 105 (429) :333-344
[9]   Competitive pressure: the effects on investments in product and process innovation [J].
Boone, J .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2000, 31 (03) :549-569