Preferences and organization structure: Toward behavioral economics micro-foundations of organizational analysis

被引:7
作者
Ben-Ner, Avner [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Carlson Sch Management, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF SOCIO-ECONOMICS | 2013年 / 46卷
关键词
Social preferences; Organization structure; Organizational analysis; Micro-foundations; Organization design; Person-organization fit; SOCIAL PREFERENCES; COOPERATION; INCENTIVES; MANAGEMENT; PERSONALITY; PERFORMANCE; COMPETITION; KNOWLEDGE; FAIRNESS; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.socec.2013.08.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The paper proposes micro-foundations for organizational analysis grounded in behavioral economics. As Simon (1985) pointed out it, "nothing is more fundamental in setting our research agenda and informing our research methods than our view of the nature of the human beings whose behavior we are studying." The paper examines optimal workplace-level organization structure (decision-making delegation, incentives and monitoring) relative to four common types of individuals, just selfish, civil, decent and dedicated employees (characterized in terms of their social preferences, self- versus other-regarding, reciprocity, trusting and trustworthiness). Four principal propositions arise from this analysis. (I) Mismatch between organization structure and employee preferences reduces productivity and profits. (2) The less prosocial employees in an organization, the more complex and sophisticated and therefore expensive the organization structure must be. (3) The less complex and less interdependent are employees' tasks, the less dependent is organization structure on employee social preferences. (4) Heterogeneity of preferences poses a design a dynamic challenge as practices generally have to be tailored to one type of employee, and will be associated with exit of other types or adverse-selection by types that will seek to exploit it. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 96
页数:10
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]   Building Micro-foundations for the Routines, Capabilities, and Performance Links [J].
Abell, Peter ;
Felin, Teppo ;
Foss, Nicolai .
MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2008, 29 (06) :489-502
[2]  
Akerlof G. A., 1980, Q J ECON, V47, P543
[3]  
Aksnes DW, 2012, WORKING PAPER
[4]   Giving according to garp: An experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism [J].
Andreoni, J ;
Miller, J .
ECONOMETRICA, 2002, 70 (02) :737-753
[5]  
[Anonymous], J ORG BEHAV MANAGEME
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1985, SSRN Scholarly Paper 1496720
[7]   Social preferences and the response to incentives: Evidence from personnel data [J].
Bandiera, O ;
Barankay, I ;
Rasul, I .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2005, 120 (03) :917-962
[8]   Morally Motivated Self-Regulation [J].
Baron, David P. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2010, 100 (04) :1299-1329
[9]  
BARON J.N., 1999, STRATEGIC HUMAN RESO
[10]  
Ben-Ner A., 1998, Economics, values, and organization, P3, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139174855.003