Rapid identification of group B streptococcus carriage by PCR to assist in the management of women with prelabour rupture of membranes in term pregnancy

被引:13
作者
Chan, Warren S. W. [1 ]
Chua, Seng C. [1 ]
Gidding, Heather F. [2 ,3 ]
Ramjan, Don [1 ]
Wong, May Y. W. [1 ]
Olma, Tom [2 ]
Thomas, Lee [2 ]
Gilbert, Gwendolyn L. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Westmead Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
[2] Westmead Hosp, Ctr Infect Dis & Microbiol Publ Hlth, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
[3] Univ New S Wales, Kirby Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Sydney Inst Emerging Infect Dis & Biosecur, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
group B streptococcus carriage; prelabour rupture of membranes in term pregnancy; PCR; POLYMERASE-CHAIN-REACTION; EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT; REACTION ASSAY; INDUCTION; COLONIZATION; LABOR; PREVENTION; COST;
D O I
10.1111/ajo.12145
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background Management of prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37weeks gestation or later) (TPROM) remains complicated in the absence of a rapid assay for group B streptococcus (GBS) colonisation. Aims To evaluate the accuracy and clinical utility of a commercial PCR assay, compared with culture, for detection of GBS colonisation in pregnant women presenting with TPROM. Methods A prospective study of women presenting with TPROM conducted in a large tertiary hospital (Westmead Hospital, Australia). Five hundred and seventy-four consecutive women with TPROM were enrolled between July 2006 and November 2007. Paired low vaginal and anal swabs were collected from women presenting with TPROM for PCR and culture on GBS selective agar following broth enrichment. Primary outcomes were sensitivity and specificity of PCR compared with GBS selective enrichment culture. Secondary analyses included comparison with a historical but otherwise similar cohort regarding clinical utility, maternal and neonatal outcomes. Results PCR sensitivity and specificity were 89.0% (95% CI - 82.8-93.6%) and 97.9% (95% CI - 96.0-99.0%), respectively, compared with culture. 72.3% of women were aware of their GBS PCR status within 3h of presentation. Compared with the historical cohort, PCR reduced the requirement for intrapartum antibiotics by 25.6% (P<0.001). There were no significant differences in maternal outcomes or combined rates of admissions to neonatal intensive care or special care nursery. Conclusions Group B streptococcus PCR is an accurate, rapid, safe and practical alternative to culture for detection of GBS colonisation in pregnant women at the time of TPROM. This method has the potential advantage to reduce costs associated with length of hospital stay.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 145
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[11]  
Flenady V, 2002, COCHRANE DATABASE SY, V3
[12]  
Gafni A, 1997, CAN MED ASSOC J, V157, P1519
[13]   A comparison of a new rapid real-time polymerase chain reaction system to traditional culture in determining group B streptococcus colonization [J].
Gavino, Michael ;
Wang, Eileen .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 197 (04) :388.e1-388.e4
[14]   Epidemiology and predictive values of risk factors for neonatal group B streptococcal sepsis [J].
Gilbert, GL ;
Hewitt, MC ;
Turner, CM ;
Leeder, SR .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2002, 42 (05) :497-503
[15]   Perinatal screening for group B streptococci: Cost-benefit analysis of rapid polymerase chain reaction [J].
Haberland, CA ;
Benitz, WE ;
Sanders, GD ;
Pietzsch, JB ;
Yamada, S ;
Nguyen, L ;
Garber, AM .
PEDIATRICS, 2002, 110 (03) :471-480
[16]   Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal infection: Current controversies [J].
Hager, WD ;
Schuchat, A ;
Gibbs, R ;
Sweet, R ;
Mead, P ;
Larsen, JW .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 96 (01) :141-145
[17]   Maternal colonization with group B Streptococcus and prelabor rupture of membranes at term: The role of induction of labor [J].
Hannah, ME ;
Ohlsson, A ;
Wang, EEL ;
Matlow, A ;
Foster, GA ;
Willan, AR ;
Hodnett, ED ;
Weston, JA ;
Farine, D ;
Seaward, PGR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 177 (04) :780-785
[18]   Prelabor rupture of the membranes at term: Expectant management at home or in hospital? [J].
Hannah, ME ;
Hodnett, ED ;
Willan, A ;
Foster, GA ;
Di Cecco, R ;
Helewa, M .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 96 (04) :533-538
[19]   Induction of labor compared with expectant management for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term [J].
Hannah, ME ;
Ohlsson, A ;
Farine, D ;
Hewson, SA ;
Hodnett, ED ;
Myhr, TL ;
Wang, EEL ;
Weston, JA ;
Willan, AR .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (16) :1005-1010
[20]   Women's evaluations of induction of labor versus expectant management for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term [J].
Hodnett, ED ;
Hannah, ME ;
Weston, JA ;
Ohlsson, A ;
Myhr, TL ;
Wang, EEI ;
Hewson, SA ;
Willan, AR ;
Farine, D .
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 1997, 24 (04) :214-220