Effect of Cohesive Contact of Backfill with Arch and Spandrel Walls of a Historical Masonry Arch Bridge on Seismic Response

被引:21
|
作者
Hokelekli, Emin [1 ]
Yilmaz, Betul Nihan [1 ]
机构
[1] Bartin Univ, Fac Engn Architecture & Design, TR-74110 Batin, Turkey
来源
关键词
historical stone bridge; seismic analysis; cohesive interface behavior; in-plane and out-of-plane; concrete damage plasticity model; BEHAVIOR; MODEL; ELEMENT; IDENTIFICATION; VULNERABILITY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.3311/PPci.14198
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Historical masonry bridges generally consist of arches, spandrels walls, backfills, piers and foundations. Under the effects such as earthquake, flood and wind, the most vulnerable structural elements of bridges against out-of-plane seismic motions are spandrel walls. Increasing length and height of spandrel walls increases the vulnerability of the bridge under loads in vertical and transverse directions. The aim of this research is to examine the in-plane and out-of-plane non-linear structural responses of the spandrel walls of a historical masonry bridge. For this purpose, a historical masonry arch bridge with built in 1787 in Bartin-Turkey was chosen as the subject structure. The 3D finite element model and nonlinear seismic analyses of the bridge were performed with ABAQUS. Initially, the backfill-spandrels and backfill-arch interfaces of the bridge were modeled with and without cohesive contact. The non-linear material responses of the spandrel walls and the arch units were defined using Concrete Damage Plasticity material model and those of the backfill unit were defined with Mohr-Coulomb material model. The east-west component of 17 August 1999 Kocaeli Earthquake's acceleration records was used in the analyses. The east-west acceleration component was applied on the bridge in-plane and out-of-plane directions during the time-history non-linear seismic analysis of the bridge. The results obtained from the analyses with and without the consideration of cohesive contact were compared to evaluate the seismic responses of the spandrel walls. As a result, cohesive interface behavior was found to significantly affect the spandrel wall response under in-plane and out-of-plane seismic forces.
引用
收藏
页码:926 / 937
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Seismic response analysis of tied arch bridge
    Wang Yunping
    Tang Dejin
    Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Civil, Structure and Environmental Engineering, 2016, 65 : 64 - 67
  • [22] Numerical Simulation of a Masonry Arch Bridge with Initial Defects Based on Cohesive Elements
    Zou, Jinsu
    Wang, Baisheng
    Ye, Lingpeng
    BUILDINGS, 2023, 13 (12)
  • [23] Assessment of load carrying capacity enhancement of an open spandrel masonry arch bridge by dynamic load testing
    Ataei, Shervan
    Miri, Amin
    Jahangiri, Meysam
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE, 2017, 11 (08) : 1086 - 1100
  • [24] Seismic response of retaining walls with cohesive backfill: Centrifuge model studies
    Candia, Gabriel
    Mikola, Roozbeh Geraili
    Sitar, Nicholas
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2016, 90 : 411 - 419
  • [25] Rehabilitation and seismic upgrading of the masonry arch bridge over the Magra river in Villafranca
    Croce, Nicola
    Croce, Pietro
    Pelusi, Marino
    Taccola, Raffaele
    XIV INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUILDING PATHOLOGY AND CONSTRUCTIONS REPAIR, 2018, 11 : 371 - 378
  • [26] Seismic Performance Evaluation Of Multi-span Existing Masonry Arch Bridge
    Laterza, Michelangelo
    D'Amato, Michele
    Casamassima, Vito Michele
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUMERICAL ANALYSIS AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS 2016 (ICNAAM-2016), 2017, 1863
  • [27] Effect of ground motion characteristics on the seismic response of a monumental concrete arch bridge
    Caglayan, B. Ozden
    Ozakgul, Kadir
    Tezer, Ovunc
    2008 SEISMIC ENGINEERING CONFERENCE COMMEMORATING THE 1908 MESSINA AND REGGIO CALABRIA EARTHQUAKE, PTS 1 AND 2, 2008, 1020 : 1701 - 1708
  • [28] Seismic motion response and fragility analyses of cantilever retaining walls with cohesive backfill
    Zamiran, Siavash
    Osouli, Abdolreza
    SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS, 2018, 58 (02) : 412 - 426
  • [29] Analysis of Dynamic Property and Seismic Response on Leaning Arch Bridge
    Wu, Zeyu
    Wang, Fuming
    Wang, Dongwei
    2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING COMPUTATION (ICEC 2010), 2010, : 145 - 148
  • [30] Influence of the backfill parameters in distinct element modelling of a backfill masonry arch bridge through the PFC2D software
    Garcia Gomez, Felipe
    Martinez Martinez, Jose Antonio
    Garcia Castillo, Luis Maria
    GEOMECHANICS AND GEOENGINEERING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2022, 17 (01): : 22 - 29