A Novel Robotic System for Single-port Urologic Surgery: First Clinical Investigation

被引:202
作者
Kaouk, Jihad H. [1 ]
Haber, Georges-Pascal [1 ]
Autorino, Riccardo [1 ]
Crouzet, Sebastien [2 ]
Ouzzane, Adil [3 ]
Flamand, Vincent [3 ]
Villers, Arnauld [3 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Glickman Urol & Kidney Inst, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Hop Edouard Herriot, Dept Urol & Transplantat, Lyon, France
[3] Univ Lille Nord France, CHU Lille, Dept Urol, Lille, France
关键词
Nephrectomy; Radical prostatectomy; Robotic surgery; Single-port surgery; Single-site surgery; Urology; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; SITE SURGERY; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; MULTIINSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS; SURGICAL INNOVATION; LESS PYELOPLASTY; EAU GUIDELINES; RISK-FACTORS; OUTCOMES; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.039
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The idea of performing a laparoscopic procedure through a single abdominal incision was conceived with the aim of expediting postoperative recovery. Objective: To determine the clinical feasibility and safety of single-port urologic procedures by using a novel robotic surgical system. Design, setting, and participants: This was a prospective institutional review board-approved, Innovation, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long-term Study (IDEAL) phase 1 study. After enrollment, patients underwent a major urologic robotic single-port procedure over a 3-wk period in July 2010. The patients were followed for 3 yr postoperatively. Intervention: Different types of urologic surgeries were performed using the da Vinci SP Surgical System. This system is intended to provide the same core clinical capabilities as the existing multiport da Vinci system, except that three articulating endoscopic instruments and an articulating endoscopic camera are inserted into the patient through a single robotic port. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The main outcomes were the technical feasibility of the procedures (as measured by the rate of conversions) and the safety of the procedures (as measured by the incidence of perioperative complications). Secondary end points consisted of evaluating other key surgical perioperative outcomes as well as midterm functional and oncologic outcomes. Results and limitations: A total of 19 patients were enrolled in the study. Eleven of them underwent radical prostatectomy; eight subjects underwent nephrectomy procedures (partial nephrectomy, four; radical nephrectomy, two; and simple nephrectomy, two). There were no conversions to alternative surgical approaches. Overall, two major (Clavien grade 3b) postoperative complications were observed in the radical prostatectomy group and none in the nephrectomy group. At 1-yr follow-up, one radical prostatectomy patient experienced biochemical recurrence, which was successfully treated with salvage radiation therapy. The median warm ischemia time for three of the partial nephrectomies was 38 min. At 3-yr follow-up all patients presented a preserved renal function; none had tumor recurrence. Study limitations include the small sample and the lack of a control group. Conclusions: We describe the first clinical application of a novel robotic platform specifically designed for single-port urologic surgery. Major urologic procedures were successfully completed without conversions. Further assessment is warranted to corroborate these promising findings. Patient summary: A novel purpose-built robotic system enables surgeons to perform safely and effectively a variety of major urologic procedures through a single small abdominal incision. (C) 2014 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1033 / 1043
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Current Status and Future Directions of Robotic Single-Site Surgery: A Systematic Review [J].
Autorino, Riccardo ;
Kaouk, Jihad H. ;
Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe ;
Gill, Inderbir S. ;
Mottrie, Alex ;
Tewari, Ash ;
Cadeddu, Jeffrey A. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 63 (02) :266-280
[2]   Urological Laparoendoscopic Single Site Surgery: Multi-Institutional Analysis of Risk Factors for Conversion and Postoperative Complications [J].
Autorino, Riccardo ;
Kaouk, Jihad H. ;
Yakoubi, Rachid ;
Rha, Koon Ho ;
Stein, Robert J. ;
White, Wesley M. ;
Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe ;
Cindolo, Luca ;
Liatsikos, Evangelos ;
Rais-Bahrami, Soroush ;
Volpe, Alessandro ;
Han, Deok Hyun ;
Derweesh, Ithaar H. ;
Lee, Seung Wook ;
Abdel-Karim, Aly M. ;
Branco, Anibal ;
Greco, Francesco ;
Allaf, Mohamad ;
Sotelo, Rene ;
Kallidonis, Panagiotis ;
Jeong, Byong Chang ;
Best, Sara ;
Bazzi, Wassim ;
Pierorazio, Phillip ;
Elsalmy, Salah ;
Rane, Abhay ;
Han, Woong Kyu ;
Yang, Bo ;
Schips, Luigi ;
Molina, Wilson R. ;
Fornara, Paolo ;
Terrone, Carlo ;
Giedelman, Camilo ;
Lee, Joo Yong ;
Crouzet, Sebastien ;
Haber, Georges-Pascal ;
Richstone, Lee ;
Sun Yinghao ;
Kim, Fernando J. ;
Cadeddu, Jeffrey A. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (06) :1989-1994
[3]   Laparoendoscopic Single-site and Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery in Urology: A Critical Analysis of the Literature [J].
Autorino, Riccardo ;
Cadeddu, Jeffrey A. ;
Desai, Mihir M. ;
Gettman, Matthew ;
Gill, Inderbir S. ;
Kavoussi, Louis R. ;
Lima, Estevao ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Richstone, Lee ;
Stolzenburg, Jens U. ;
Kaouk, Jihad H. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 59 (01) :26-45
[4]   Feasibility and Preliminary Clinical Outcomes of Robotic Laparoendoscopic Single-Site (R-LESS) Pyeloplasty Using a New Single-Port Platform [J].
Cestari, Andrea ;
Buffi, Nicolo Maria ;
Lista, Giuliana ;
Lughezzani, Giovanni ;
Larcher, Alessandro ;
Lazzeri, Massimo ;
Sangalli, Mattia ;
Rigatti, Patrizio ;
Guazzoni, Giorgio .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 62 (01) :175-179
[5]   Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a review of current outcomes [J].
Coelho, Rafael F. ;
Chauhan, Sanket ;
Palmer, Kenneth J. ;
Rocco, Bernardo ;
Patel, Manoj B. ;
Patel, Vipul R. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 104 (10) :1428-1435
[6]   Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey [J].
Dindo, D ;
Demartines, N ;
Clavien, PA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) :205-213
[7]   Surgical Innovation and Evaluation 2 Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation [J].
Ergina, Patrick L. ;
Cook, Jonathan A. ;
Blazeby, Jane M. ;
Boutron, Isabelle ;
Clavien, Pierre-Alain ;
Reeves, Barnaby C. ;
Seiler, Christoph M. .
LANCET, 2009, 374 (9695) :1097-1104
[8]   Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Nephrectomy Compared with Conventional Laparoscopic Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies [J].
Fan, Xinxiang ;
Lin, Tianxin ;
Xu, Kewei ;
Yin, Zi ;
Huang, Hai ;
Dong, Wen ;
Huang, Jian .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 62 (04) :601-612
[9]   Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors [J].
Gill, Inderbir S. ;
Kavoussi, Louis R. ;
Lane, Brian R. ;
Blute, Michael L. ;
Babineau, Denise ;
Colombo, J. Roberto, Jr. ;
Frank, Igor ;
Permpongkosol, Sompol ;
Weight, Christopher J. ;
Kaouk, Jihad H. ;
Kattan, Michael W. ;
Novick, Andrew C. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (01) :41-46
[10]   Laparoendoscopic Single-site Partial Nephrectomy: A Multi-institutional Outcome Analysis [J].
Greco, Francesco ;
Autorino, Riccardo ;
Rha, Koon H. ;
Derweesh, Ithaar ;
Cindolo, Luca ;
Richstone, Lee ;
Herrmann, Thomas R. W. ;
Liatsikos, Evangelos ;
Sun, Yinghao ;
Fanizza, Caterina ;
Nagele, Udo ;
Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe ;
Rais-Bahrami, Soroush ;
Liss, Michael A. ;
Schips, Luigi ;
Kassab, Ahmad ;
Wang, Linhui ;
Kallidonis, Panagiotis ;
Wu, Zhenjie ;
Young, Shin Tae ;
Mohammed, Nasreldin ;
Haber, Georges-Pascal ;
Springer, Christopher ;
Fornara, Paolo ;
Kaouk, Jihad H. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 64 (02) :314-322