Oral language supports early literacy: A pilot cluster randomized trial in disadvantaged schools

被引:29
作者
Snow, Pamela C. [1 ]
Eadie, Patricia A. [2 ]
Connell, Judy [3 ]
Dalheim, Brenda [3 ]
McCusker, Hugh J.
Munro, John K. [4 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Sch Psychol & Psychiat, Bendigo, Vic 3552, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Audiol & Speech Pathol, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[3] Catholic Educ Off, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Grad Sch Educ, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
Oral language; early literacy; teachers; PROFESSIONAL-DEVELOPMENT; IMPAIRMENT; COMPETENCE; CHILDREN; SKILLS; RISK;
D O I
10.3109/17549507.2013.845691
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
This study examined the impact of teacher professional development aimed at improving the capacity of primary teachers in disadvantaged schools to strengthen children's expressive and receptive oral language skills and early literacy success in the first 2 years of school. Fourteen low-SES schools in Victoria, Australia were randomly allocated to a research (n = 8) or control arm (n = 6), resulting in an initial sample of 1254 students, (n = 602 in research arm and n = 652 in control arm). The intervention comprised 6 days of teacher and principal professional development (delivered by language and literacy experts), school-based continuing contact with the research team and completion by one staff member of each research school of a postgraduate unit on early language and literacy. Schools in the control arm received standard teaching according to state auspiced curriculum guidelines. Full data were available on 979 students at follow-up (time 2). Students in the research arm performed significantly better on Test of Language Development: Primary (Fourth Edition) sub-tests (p <= .002) and the Reading Progress Test (F = 10.4(1); p = .001) than students in the control arm at time 2. Narrative scores were not significantly different at time 2, although students in research schools showed greater gains. Findings provide "proof of concept" for this approach, and are discussed with respect to implications for teacher professional development and pre-service education concerning the psycholinguistic competencies that underpin the transition to literacy.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 506
页数:12
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1965, Report No. 3)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Knowing, Learning, and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315044408-14
[3]   Teacher identification of children at risk for language impairment in the first year of school [J].
Antoniazzi, Diana ;
Snow, Pamela ;
Dickson-Swift, Virginia .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2010, 12 (03) :244-252
[4]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2008, WHAT IS SEIFA FREQ A
[5]  
Blank M., 2003, Preschool Language Assessment Instrument II
[6]  
Borko H., 2004, Educational Researcher, V33, P3, DOI [10.3102/0013189X033008003, DOI 10.3102/0013189X033008003]
[7]   Associated reading skills in children with a history of Specific Language Impairment (SLI) [J].
Botting, N. ;
Simkin, Z. ;
Conti-Ramsden, G. .
READING AND WRITING, 2006, 19 (01) :77-98
[8]   Literacy coaching as a component of professional development [J].
Carlisle, Joanne F. ;
Berebitsky, Dan .
READING AND WRITING, 2011, 24 (07) :773-800
[9]  
Catts H.W., 1999, Scientific Studies of Reading, V3, P331, DOI [DOI 10.1207/S1532799XSSR0304_2, 10.1207/s1532799xssr0304_2]
[10]  
Centa Y, 2005, BEGINNING READING BA