Stabilizing effect of posterior lumbar interbody fusion cages before and after cyclic loading

被引:38
作者
Kettler, A
Wilke, HJ
Dietl, R
Krammer, M
Lumeta, C
Claes, L
机构
[1] Univ Ulm, Inst Orthopaed Res & Biomech, D-89081 Ulm, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Acad Hosp, Bogenhausen, Dept Neurosurg, D-8000 Munich, Germany
关键词
lumbar spine; interbody fusion device; flexibility; cyclic testing;
D O I
10.3171/spi.2000.92.1.0087
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Object. The function of intel body fusion cages is to stabilize spinal segments primarily by distracting them as well as by allowing bone ingrowth and fusion. An important condition for efficient formation of bone tissue is achieving adequate spinal stability. However, the initial stability may be reduced due to repeated movements of the spine during everyday activity. Therefore, in addition to immediate stability, stability after cyclic loading is of remarkable relevance; however, this has not yet been investigated. The object of this study was to investigate the immediate stabilizing effect of three different posterior lumbar interbody fusion cages and to clarify the effect of cyclic loading on the stabilization. Methods. Before and directly after implantation of a Zientek, Stryker, or Ray posterior lumbar interbody fusion cage, 24 lumbar spine segment specimens were each evaluated in a spine tester. Pure lateral bending, flexion-extension. and axial rotation moments (+/- 7.5 Nm) were applied continuously. The motion in each specimen was measured simultaneously. The specimens were then loaded cyclically (40,000 cycles, 5 Hz) with an axial compression force ranging from 200 to 1000 N. Finally, they were tested once again in the spine tester. Conclusions. In general, a decrease of movement in all loading directions was noted after insertion of the Zientek and Ray cages and an increase of movement after implantation of a Stryker cage. In all three cage groups greater stability was demonstrated in lateral bending and flexion than in extension and axial rotation. Reduced stability during cyclic loading was observed in all three cage groups; however, loss of stability was most pronounced when the Ray cage was used.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 92
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
BAGBY GW, 1988, ORTHOPEDICS, V11, P931
[2]   INTERBODY LUMBAR FUSION USING A CARBON-FIBER CAGE IMPLANT VERSUS ALLOGRAFT BONE - AN INVESTIGATIONAL STUDY IN THE SPANISH GOAT [J].
BRANTIGAN, JW ;
MCAFEE, PC ;
CUNNINGHAM, BW ;
WANG, H ;
ORBEGOSO, CM .
SPINE, 1994, 19 (13) :1436-1444
[3]   A CARBON-FIBER IMPLANT TO AID INTERBODY LUMBAR FUSION - 2-YEAR CLINICAL-RESULTS IN THE 1ST 26 PATIENTS [J].
BRANTIGAN, JW ;
STEFFEE, AD .
SPINE, 1993, 18 (14) :2106-2117
[4]   A CARBON-FIBER IMPLANT TO AID INTERBODY LUMBAR FUSION - MECHANICAL TESTING [J].
BRANTIGAN, JW ;
STEFFEE, AD ;
GEIGER, JM .
SPINE, 1991, 16 (06) :S277-S282
[5]   Posterior lumbar interbody fusion - A biomechanical comparison, including a new threaded cage [J].
Brodke, DS ;
Dick, JC ;
Kunz, DN ;
McCabe, R ;
Zdeblick, TA .
SPINE, 1997, 22 (01) :26-31
[6]  
Jost B, 1998, Eur Spine J, V7, P132
[7]   Interbody cage stabilisation in the lumbar spine - Evaluation of cage design, posterior instrumentation and bone density [J].
Lund, T ;
Oxland, TR ;
Jost, B ;
Cripton, P ;
Grassmann, S ;
Etter, C ;
Nolte, LP .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1998, 80B (02) :351-359
[8]  
Moeini SMR, 1998, J SPINAL DISORD, V11, P129
[9]  
Nasca RJ, 1998, J SPINAL DISORD, V11, P136
[10]  
Nibu K, 1997, J SPINAL DISORD, V10, P357