The Role of Retrieval in Answering Multiple-Choice Questions

被引:10
作者
Little, Jeri L. [1 ,2 ]
Frickey, Elise A. [2 ]
Fung, Alexandra K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Univ Hayward, Dept Psychol, 25800 Carlos Bee Blvd, Hayward, CA 94542 USA
[2] Hillsdale Coll, Dept Psychol, Hillsdale, MI 49242 USA
关键词
testing effects; learning; multiple choice; retrieval; TESTS; RETENTION; ACCESS; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1037/xlm0000638
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Taking a test improves memory for that tested information, a finding referred to as the testing effect. Multiple-choice tests tend to produce smaller testing effects than do cued-recall tests, and this result is largely attributed to the different processing that the two formats are assumed to induce. Specifically, it is generally assumed that the multiple-choice format bypasses the need to retrieve information. Research suggests, however, that multiple-choice questions can be constructed to induce retrieval of information pertaining to the incorrect alternatives. In the present research, we investigated the processes that individuals use to answer multiple-choice questions and how those processes relate to later memory. particularly for information pertaining to the incorrect alternatives. Most critically, we found that participants sometimes spontaneously recall information pertaining to incorrect alternatives, and these spontaneous retrievals are associated with retention of those alternatives as correct answers to related questions later. Although multiple-choice questions can be constructed so as to bypass retrieval, they can also be constructed to induce retrieval, and when they are, learning benefits are likely to occur. The present work has practical implications for how instructors can create multiple-choice questions to induce processes that facilitate learning.
引用
收藏
页码:1473 / 1485
页数:13
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Anderson R.C., 1975, Psychology of Learning and Motivation, V9, P89, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60269-8, 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60269-8]
[2]   Stabilizing access to marginal and submarginal knowledge [J].
Berger, SA ;
Hall, LK ;
Bahrick, HP .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED, 1999, 5 (04) :438-447
[3]  
Bjork R.A., 1975, INFORM PROCESSING CO, P123, DOI DOI 10.2307/1421430
[4]   Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing [J].
Butler, Andrew C. ;
Roediger, Henry L., III .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2008, 36 (03) :604-616
[5]   Multiple-choice tests stabilize access to marginal knowledge [J].
Cantor, Allison D. ;
Eslick, Andrea N. ;
Marsh, Elizabeth J. ;
Bjork, Robert A. ;
Bjork, Elizabeth Ligon .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2015, 43 (02) :193-205
[6]   Semantic Information Activated During Retrieval Contributes to Later Retention: Support for the Mediator Effectiveness Hypothesis of the Testing Effect [J].
Carpenter, Shana K. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2011, 37 (06) :1547-1552
[7]   Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: Support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect [J].
Carpenter, SK ;
DeLosh, EL .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2006, 34 (02) :268-276
[8]   Retrieval-induced forgetting in educational contexts: Monitoring, expertise, text integration, and test format [J].
Carroll, Marie ;
Campbell-Ratcliffe, Jonathan ;
Murnane, Hannah ;
Perfect, T. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 19 (4-5) :580-606
[9]   Retrieval-induced facilitation: Initially nontested material can benefit from prior testing of related material [J].
Chan, Jason C. K. ;
McDermott, Kathleen B. ;
Roediger, Henry L., III .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2006, 135 (04) :553-571
[10]   When does retrieval induce forgetting and when does it induce facilitation? Implications for retrieval inhibition, testing effect, and text processing [J].
Chan, Jason C. K. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2009, 61 (02) :153-170