An economic evaluation of a European cohort from a multinational trial of linezolid versus teicoplanin in serious gram-positive bacterial infections: the importance of treatment setting in evaluating treatment effects

被引:19
作者
Nathwani, D
Li, JZ
Balan, DA
Willke, RJ
Rittenhouse, BE
Mozaffari, E
Tavakoli, M
Tang, T
机构
[1] Tayside Univ Hosp, Ninewells Hosp & Med Sch, Infect & Immunodeficiency Unit, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland
[2] Pfizer Inc, Global Outcomes Res, Kalamazoo, MI USA
[3] Western Michigan Univ, Dept Econ, Kalamazoo, MI 49008 USA
[4] Pfizer Inc, Global Hlth Outcomes, Peapack, NJ USA
[5] Univ St Andrews, PharmacoEcon Res Ctr, St Andrews, Fife, Scotland
关键词
linezolid; teicoplanin; gram-positive bacterial infections LOS; cost of treatment; intravenous to oral switch;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2003.09.020
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
In a recent multinational trial, hospital resource use and total cost of treatment were compared between linezolid and teicoplanin for severe Gram-positive bacterial infections among 227 European hospitalised patients. The results show that the linezolid group had a 3,2-day (6.3 for linezolid versus 9.5 for teicoplanin groups) shorter mean intravenous antibiotic treatment duration. Certain baseline variables, particularly the inpatient location at enrolment and the presence of outpatient/home parenteral antibiotic therapy (OHPAT), had substantial effects on length of stay (LOS) and cost of treatment. After adjusting for the between-treatment difference in these two variables and other baseline variables, the results showed non-significant shorter LOS and lower mean total cost of treatment for the linezolid group among patients with no access to OHPAT. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 324
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Sequential antibiotic therapy
    Barlow, GD
    Nathwani, D
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2000, 13 (06) : 599 - 607
  • [2] DEFINITIONS FOR SEPSIS AND ORGAN FAILURE AND GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF INNOVATIVE THERAPIES IN SEPSIS
    BONE, RC
    BALK, RA
    CERRA, FB
    DELLINGER, RP
    FEIN, AM
    KNAUS, WA
    SCHEIN, RMH
    SIBBALD, WJ
    [J]. CHEST, 1992, 101 (06) : 1644 - 1655
  • [3] CACERES VM, 1994, J FAM PRACTICE, V39, P337
  • [4] CAMMARATA SK, 2000, P INT C AM THOR SOC
  • [5] Glycopeptide resistance in Staphylococcus aureus
    Chadwick, PR
    Wooster, SL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2000, 40 (03) : 211 - 217
  • [6] Clinical and microbiologic efficacy and safety profile of linezolid, a new oxazolidinone antibiotic
    Corti, G
    Cinelli, R
    Paradisi, F
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2000, 16 (04) : 527 - 530
  • [7] Intravenous-to-oral antibiotic switch therapy - A cost-effective approach
    Cunha, BA
    [J]. POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 1997, 101 (04) : 111 - &
  • [8] Sequential antibiotic therapy: The right patient, the right time and the right outcome
    Davey, P
    Nathwani, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 1998, 37 : 37 - 44
  • [9] Survey of infections due to Staphylococcus species:: Frequency of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates collected in the United States, Canada, Latin America, Europe, and the Western Pacific region for the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1997-1999
    Diekema, DJ
    Pfaller, MA
    Schmitz, FJ
    Smayevsky, J
    Bell, J
    Jones, RN
    Beach, M
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2001, 32 : S114 - S132
  • [10] DRUMMOND M, 1995, J RHEUMATOL, V22, P1403