ARE THE MARGINAL CONVERGENCE OUTCOMES OF THE COHESION POLICY DIMINISHING?

被引:0
作者
Butkus, Mindaugas [1 ]
Maciulyte-Sniukiene, Alma [2 ]
Matuzeviciute, Kristina [1 ]
机构
[1] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Fac Business Management, Dept Econ Engn, Vilnius, Lithuania
[2] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Fac Business Management, Dept Business Technol & Entrepreneurship, Vilnius, Lithuania
关键词
Cohesion Policy; Cohesion investments; regional disparities; convergence; diminishing return; NUTS2; NUTS3; REGIONAL-DEVELOPMENT; STRUCTURAL FUNDS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; IMPACT; TOO;
D O I
10.3846/jbem.2020.13170
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Significant disparities still exist between regions of the European Union, even though substantial Cohesion investments are directed to address this issue. To adjust the Cohesion Policy (CP), researchers assess the returns of the CP, but almost all studies are carried out at NUTS1&2 or a country level, even though significant disparities occur at NUTS3 level. Moreover, just a few studies examine the non-linear effects of the CP, and none of them covers the NUTS3 disaggregation level. Filling the gap of previous contributions, the paper aims to investigate convergence outcomes of the CP at NUTS2&3 level and to identify whether the marginal effect of the CP is diminishing. The estimation strategy is based on the modified specification of the difference-in-differences estimator that has an advantage while examining policy effects, using non-experimental data. Based on research findings, the essential guidelines for the improvement of the CP can be drawn up: i) the distribution policy of Cohesion investments should focus on smaller territorial units to reduce disparities at NUTS3 level; ii) the intensity of the CP's transfers has to be optimised because excessive intensity does not provide a positive return.
引用
收藏
页码:1390 / 1410
页数:21
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [31] Structural Funds and European Regional Growth: Comparison of Effects among Different Programming Periods
    Pinho, Carlos
    Varum, Celeste
    Antunes, Micaela
    [J]. EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2015, 23 (07) : 1302 - 1326
  • [32] Pontarollo N., 2017, EU COHESION POLICY, P93
  • [33] Quality of Government and the Returns of Investment: Examining the Impact of Cohesion Expenditure in European Regions
    Rodriguez-Pose, Andres
    Garcilazo, Enrique
    [J]. REGIONAL STUDIES, 2015, 49 (08) : 1274 - 1290
  • [34] SWECO, 2008, FIN REP ERDF CF REG
  • [35] Szitásiová V, 2014, TRANSYLV REV ADM SCI, P167
  • [36] Wallace HelenMark Pollack., 2010, POLICY MAKING EUROPE, VSixth
  • [37] Wostner P., 2009, 69 EUR POL RES CTR