ARE THE MARGINAL CONVERGENCE OUTCOMES OF THE COHESION POLICY DIMINISHING?

被引:0
作者
Butkus, Mindaugas [1 ]
Maciulyte-Sniukiene, Alma [2 ]
Matuzeviciute, Kristina [1 ]
机构
[1] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Fac Business Management, Dept Econ Engn, Vilnius, Lithuania
[2] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Fac Business Management, Dept Business Technol & Entrepreneurship, Vilnius, Lithuania
关键词
Cohesion Policy; Cohesion investments; regional disparities; convergence; diminishing return; NUTS2; NUTS3; REGIONAL-DEVELOPMENT; STRUCTURAL FUNDS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; IMPACT; TOO;
D O I
10.3846/jbem.2020.13170
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Significant disparities still exist between regions of the European Union, even though substantial Cohesion investments are directed to address this issue. To adjust the Cohesion Policy (CP), researchers assess the returns of the CP, but almost all studies are carried out at NUTS1&2 or a country level, even though significant disparities occur at NUTS3 level. Moreover, just a few studies examine the non-linear effects of the CP, and none of them covers the NUTS3 disaggregation level. Filling the gap of previous contributions, the paper aims to investigate convergence outcomes of the CP at NUTS2&3 level and to identify whether the marginal effect of the CP is diminishing. The estimation strategy is based on the modified specification of the difference-in-differences estimator that has an advantage while examining policy effects, using non-experimental data. Based on research findings, the essential guidelines for the improvement of the CP can be drawn up: i) the distribution policy of Cohesion investments should focus on smaller territorial units to reduce disparities at NUTS3 level; ii) the intensity of the CP's transfers has to be optimised because excessive intensity does not provide a positive return.
引用
收藏
页码:1390 / 1410
页数:21
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2012, 201214 BRUEG
  • [2] Bandonio D, 2016, EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
  • [3] Barca F., 2009, An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy: A Place-Based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations
  • [4] Becker S. O, 2015, NDB EC EUROPEAN INTE
  • [5] Effects of EU Regional Policy: 1989-2013
    Becker, Sascha O.
    Egger, Peter H.
    von Ehrlich, Maximilian
    [J]. REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 2018, 69 : 143 - 152
  • [6] Too much of a good thing? On the growth effects of the EU's regional policy
    Becker, Sascha O.
    Egger, Peter H.
    von Ehrlich, Maximilian
    [J]. EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 56 (04) : 648 - 668
  • [7] Unpacking the growth impacts of European Union Cohesion Policy: transmission channels from Cohesion Policy into economic growth
    Berkowitz, Peter
    Monfort, Philippe
    Pienkowski, Jerzy
    [J]. REGIONAL STUDIES, 2020, 54 (01) : 60 - 71
  • [8] The effectiveness of structural policy in the European Union: An empirical analysis for the EU-15 in 1995-2001
    Beugelsdijk, M
    Eijffinger, SCW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES, 2005, 43 (01): : 37 - 51
  • [9] Does the Cohesion Policy Have the Same Influence on Growth Everywhere? A Geographically Weighted Regression Approach in Central and Eastern Europe
    Bourdin, Sebastien
    [J]. ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 95 (03) : 256 - 287
  • [10] Butkus M, 2019, EKON CAS, V67, P647