Resistance to glyphosate in Lolium rigidum.: I.: Bioevaluation

被引:135
作者
Pratley, J [1 ]
Urwin, N
Stanton, R
Baines, P
Broster, J
Cullis, K
Schafer, D
Bohn, J
Krueger, R
机构
[1] Charles Sturt Univ, Farrer Ctr, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia
[2] Charles Sturt Univ, Sch Informat Studies, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia
[3] Monsanto Co, Life Sci, St Louis, MO 63167 USA
关键词
diclofop-methyl; glyphosate; Lolium rigidum Gaud. LOLRI; germination inhibition; visual injury rating; multiple resistance; resistance phenotype; herbicide tolerance; glyphosate ammonium; glyphosate isopropylamine; glyphosate trimesium; biotype; LOLRI;
D O I
10.1017/S0043174500091992
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Glyphosate is the world's most widely used herbicide. It is nonselective and has been used to control a broad range of weed species for the past 20 yr, without the appearance of resistant weed biotypes. However, a biotype of Lolium rigidum from a field in Northern Victoria, Australia, in which glyphosate had been used for the past 15 yr, failed to be controlled by label recommended rates. Based on LD50 values from pot dose-response experiments, this biotype exhibited resistance to glyphosate and was nearly 10-fold more resistant compared to the susceptible biotypes tested The biotype was resistant to three different salts of glyphosate. The biotype was also nearly threefold more resistant to diclofop-methyl but was susceptible to other commonly used selective and broad-spectrum herbicides. Between the two-leaf and tillering stages of development, a susceptible biotype exhibited a small but significant decrease in tolerance to glyphosate, whereas tolerance of the resistant biotype remained unchanged with age. The resistant phenotype was verified in experiments in which seed was germinated in the presence of glyphosate. Observations on shoot and root growth of seedlings in these experiments suggested that the resistance mechanism might be associated more with the shoot than with the root.
引用
收藏
页码:405 / 411
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Resistant Pest Manage Newsl
[2]  
Atkinson D., 1985, The herbicide glyphosate, P127
[3]   MECHANISM OF GLYPHOSATE TOLERANCE IN BIRDSFOOT-TREFOIL (LOTUS-CORNICULATUS) [J].
BOERBOOM, CM ;
WYSE, DL ;
SOMERS, DA .
WEED SCIENCE, 1990, 38 (06) :463-467
[4]   Perspectives on glyphosate resistance [J].
Bradshaw, LD ;
Padgette, SR ;
Kimball, SL ;
Wells, BH .
WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 11 (01) :189-198
[5]   DIFFERENTIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY OF FIELD BINDWEED (CONVOLVULUS-ARVENSIS) BIOTYPES TO GLYPHOSATE [J].
DEGENNARO, FP ;
WELLER, SC .
WEED SCIENCE, 1984, 32 (04) :472-476
[6]   IMPORT OF A PRECURSOR PROTEIN INTO CHLOROPLASTS IS INHIBITED BY THE HERBICIDE GLYPHOSATE [J].
DELLACIOPPA, G ;
KISHORE, GM .
EMBO JOURNAL, 1988, 7 (05) :1299-1305
[7]  
Denis MH, 1997, PLANT PHYSIOL BIOCH, V35, P291
[8]   A GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT 5-ENOL-PYRUVYL-SHIKIMATE-3-PHOSPHATE SYNTHASE CONFERS TOLERANCE TO A MAIZE CELL-LINE [J].
FORLANI, G ;
NIELSEN, E ;
RACCHI, ML .
PLANT SCIENCE, 1992, 85 (01) :9-15
[9]   DEVELOPMENT OF HERBICIDE RESISTANCE IN ANNUAL RYEGRASS POPULATIONS (LOLIUM-RIGIDUM GAUD.) IN THE CROPPING BELT OF WESTERN-AUSTRALIA [J].
GILL, GS .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 1995, 35 (01) :67-72
[10]  
Hall Linda M., 1994, P243