Potato Response to Nitrogen Sources and Rates in an Irrigated Sandy Soil

被引:51
作者
Cambouris, Athyna N. [1 ]
St Luce, Mervin [1 ]
Zebarth, Bernie J. [2 ]
Ziadi, Noura [1 ]
Grant, Cynthia A. [3 ]
Perron, Isabelle [1 ]
机构
[1] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Quebec Res & Dev Ctr, 2560 Hochelaga Blvd, Quebec City, PQ G1V 2J3, Canada
[2] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Fredericton Res & Dev Ctr, 850 Lincoln Rd,POB 20280, Fredericton, NB E3B 4Z7, Canada
[3] Brandon Res Ctr, Brandon Res & Dev Ctr, 2701 Grand Valley Rd,POB 1000A,RR 3, Brandon, MB R7A 5Y3, Canada
关键词
POLYOLEFIN-COATED UREA; CONTROLLED-RELEASE UREA; RUSSET BURBANK POTATO; FERTILIZER NITROGEN; YIELD RESPONSE; TUBER CHARACTERISTICS; AMMONIUM-NITRATE; OXIDE EMISSIONS; CROP RESPONSE; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.2134/agronj2015.0351
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Management strategies to reduce N losses to the environment from potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) production while maintaining yields depend on selecting the right N source and rate. A 5-yr (2008-2012) field experiment was conducted on an irrigated sandy soil in Quebec, Canada, to examine the effect of N fertilizer source and rate on total (TY) and marketable tuber yield (MY), total plant N accumulation (vines + tubers), specific gravity, culls (unmarketable tubers), and apparent fertilizer N recovery (ANR). The treatments included an unfertilized control, and three N sources [ammonium nitrate (AN), ammonium sulfate (AS), and polymer-coated urea (PCU)] applied at four rates (60, 120, 200, and 280 kg N ha(-1)). The PCU was applied 100% at planting and the AN and AS were applied 40% at planting and 60% at hilling. The TY and MY increased with N rate up to 200 kg N ha(-1), but were similar among the N sources. On average, total plant N accumulation and ANR were greater for AN and PCU than AS. However in 2008, when there was a greater risk of N loss due to high rainfall, total plant N accumulation and ANR were greater for PCU than AN and AS. Tuber specific gravity and culls were influenced by N rate, but the response was dependent on soil and climatic conditions. Results suggest that, under humid conditions with irrigation, a one-time application of PCU in potato production can minimize the risk of N loss without reducing tuber yield and quality.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 401
页数:11
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, KEYS SOIL TAXONOMY, V10th
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, FAOSTAT
[3]   Comparison of three statistical models describing potato yield response to nitrogen fertilizer [J].
Bélanger, G ;
Walsh, JR ;
Richards, JE ;
Milburn, PH ;
Ziadi, N .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2000, 92 (05) :902-908
[4]   Nitrogen fertilization and irrigation affects tuber characteristics of two potato cultivars [J].
Bélanger, G ;
Walsh, JR ;
Richards, JE ;
Milburn, PH ;
Ziadi, N .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POTATO RESEARCH, 2002, 79 (04) :269-279
[5]   Controlled-Release Fertilizer Effect on Potato and Groundwater Nitrogen in Sandy Soil [J].
Bero, Nicholas J. ;
Ruark, Matthew D. ;
Lowery, Birl .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2014, 106 (02) :359-368
[6]   NITROGEN-SOURCE EVALUATION FOR POTATO PRODUCTION ON IRRIGATED SANDY SOILS [J].
BUNDY, LG ;
WOLKOWSKI, RP ;
WEIS, GG .
AMERICAN POTATO JOURNAL, 1986, 63 (08) :385-397
[7]   Effect of split application of fertilizer nitrogen on N2O emissions from potatoes [J].
Burton, D. L. ;
Zebarth, B. J. ;
Gillarn, K. M. ;
MacLeod, J. A. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2008, 88 (02) :229-239
[8]   Response to added nitrogen of a continuous potato sequence as related to sand thickness over clay [J].
Cambouris, A. N. ;
Zebarth, B. J. ;
Nolin, M. C. ;
Laverdiere, M. R. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2007, 87 (04) :829-839
[9]   Apparent fertilizer nitrogen recovery and residual soil nitrate under continuous potato cropping: Effect of N fertilization rate and timing [J].
Cambouris, A. N. ;
Zebarth, B. J. ;
Nolin, M. C. ;
Laverdiere, M. R. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2008, 88 (05) :813-825
[10]   Soil- and Plant-Based Indices in Potato Production in Response to Polymer-Coated Urea [J].
Cambouris, Athyna N. ;
St Luce, Mervin ;
Ziadi, Noura ;
Zebarth, Bernie J. .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2014, 106 (06) :2125-2136