The BRCA Self-Concept Scale: a new instrument to measure self-concept in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers

被引:47
作者
Esplen, Mary Jane [1 ,2 ]
Stuckless, Noreen [2 ,3 ]
Hunter, Jonathan [2 ,4 ]
Liede, Alexander [5 ]
Metcalfe, Kelly [5 ]
Glendon, Gordon [6 ]
Narod, Steven [5 ]
Butler, Kate
Scott, Jenna [7 ]
Irwin, Ellen [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Network, Toronto Gen Res Inst, Behav Sci & Hlth Res Div, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Psychiat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] York Univ, Dept Psychol, Toronto, ON M3J 2R7, Canada
[4] Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
[5] Womens Coll Hosp Res Inst, Ctr Res Womens Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Ontario Canc Genet Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] BC Canc Agcy, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[8] Hamilton Reg Canc Ctr, Hamilton, ON L8V 1C3, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
cancer; oncology; instrument development; genetic testing; self-concept; BREAST-CANCER; GENETIC INFORMATION; POSSIBLE SELVES; EVENT SCALE; IMPACT; RISK; WOMEN; STRESS; PERSONALITY; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1002/pon.1498
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Genetic testing for BRCA1/2 has psychosocial impacts including those related to views of personal health, sense of self and identity and body image. The centrality of a person's self-concept in maintaining physical and psychosocial well-being has been well recognized; however, to date research exploring altered self-concept related to carrier knowledge is limited. Objective: The objective of the study was to develop and validate a scale to measure the self-concept among individuals testing positive for BRCA1/2 mutations. Methods: The study was conducted in two phases: phase 1: item generation and refinement and phase II: scale selection and initial validation. During phase 1, scale items were generated through individual interviews and focus groups of women with BRCA1/2 mutations, including women with or without a prior diagnosis of cancer. In phase II items were selected based on several criteria resulting in a 25-item scale, which underwent a reliability analyses and preliminary validation with 115 women. A second sample of 126 women was used to conduct further validation and samples were pooled to conduct factor analysis and the final scale selection. Results: A 17-item self-concept scale emerged having three factors: stigma, vulnerability and mastery demonstrating evidence for an instrument with promising psychometric properties (total scale alpha = 0.90). Conclusions: The scale has direct relevance for research in facilitating our understanding of the specific aspects of the self, which are vulnerable to BRCA1/2 testing and which play a role in clinical outcomes, to facilitate the development and specific testing of interventions and may be used as an outcome measure. Specific measurement tools for genetic populations will ultimately assist in the clinical management of these populations. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1216 / 1229
页数:14
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]  
Arver Brita, 2004, Fam Cancer, V3, P109
[2]   Stress and genetic testing for disease risk [J].
Baum, A ;
Friedman, AL ;
Zakowski, SG .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 16 (01) :8-19
[3]  
Baumeister R. F., 1998, Handbook of social psychology, V4th, P680
[4]  
Beck A. T., 1985, Anxiety disorders and phobias: A cognitive perspective
[5]  
Beck A.T., 1983, TREATMENT DEPRESSION, P265
[6]   BRCA1 and BRCA2:: From molecular genetics to clinical medicine [J].
Blackwood, MA ;
Weber, BL .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (05) :1969-1977
[7]   Psychosocial issues in cancer genetics - Current status and future directions [J].
Bleiker, EMA ;
Hahn, DEE ;
Aaronson, NK .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2003, 42 (04) :276-286
[8]   THE ROLE OF FACTOR-ANALYSIS IN THE DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF PERSONALITY-SCALES [J].
BRIGGS, SR ;
CHEEK, JM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 1986, 54 (01) :106-148
[9]   Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing: a systematic review [J].
Broadstock, M ;
Michie, S ;
Marteau, T .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2000, 8 (10) :731-738
[10]   APPROACHES TO PERSONALITY-INVENTORY CONSTRUCTION - A COMPARISON OF MERITS [J].
BURISCH, M .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1984, 39 (03) :214-227