Activity-Centred Analysis and Design (ACAD): Core purposes, distinctive qualities and current developments

被引:53
作者
Goodyear, Peter [1 ]
Carvalho, Lucila [2 ]
Yeoman, Pippa [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sydney Sch Educ & Social Work, Ctr Res Learning & Innovat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Massey Univ, Inst Educ, Wellington, New Zealand
[3] Univ Sydney, Educ Innovat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT | 2021年 / 69卷 / 02期
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Learning activity; Analytical frameworks; Educational design; Design for learning; Teaching-as-design; Design rationale; Design tools; EDUCATIONAL-RESEARCH; TEACHERS; PLACE; GAP;
D O I
10.1007/s11423-020-09926-7
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This paper provides a summary account of Activity-Centred Analysis and Design (ACAD). ACAD offers a practical approach to analysing complex learning situations, in a way that can generate knowledge that is reusable in subsequent (re)design work. ACAD has been developed over the last two decades. It has been tested and refined through collaborative analyses of a large number of complex learning situations and through research studies involving experienced and inexperienced design teams. The paper offers a definition and high level description of ACAD and goes on to explain the underlying motivation. The paper also provides an overview of two current areas of development in ACAD: the creation of explicit design rationales and the ACAD toolkit for collaborative design meetings. As well as providing some ideas that can help teachers, design teams and others discuss and agree on their working methods, ACAD has implications for some broader issues in educational technology research and development. It questions some deep assumptions about the framing of research and design thinking, in the hope that fresh ideas may be useful to people involved in leadership and advocacy roles in the field.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 464
页数:20
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Alexander C., 1977, A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, THESIS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, HERDSA REV HIGHER ED
[4]   Exploring students' explanations for off-task practices in an innovative learning environment (ILE) using a typology of agency as theoretical framework [J].
Arnesen, Thomas ;
Arnesen, Trond-Egil ;
Elstad, Eyvind .
PEDAGOGY CULTURE AND SOCIETY, 2021, 29 (04) :651-668
[5]  
Ashwin P., 2012, Analyzing teaching-learning interactions in higher education: Accounting for structure and agency
[6]  
Barab S, 2014, CAMBRIDGE HANDBOOK OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 2ND EDITION, P151
[7]   How a centralised approach to learning design influences students: a mixed methods study [J].
Bearman, Margaret ;
Lambert, Sarah ;
O'Donnell, Marcus .
HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 40 (04) :692-705
[8]   Self-regulation in open-ended online assignment tasks: the importance of initial task interpretation and goal setting [J].
Beckman, Karley ;
Apps, Tiffani ;
Bennett, Sue ;
Dalgarno, Barney ;
Kennedy, Gregor ;
Lockyer, Lori .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2021, 46 (04) :821-835
[9]  
Bernstein B., 2000, Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research
[10]   The Gap Between Educational Research and Practice: A literature review, symposium, and questionnaire [J].
Broekkamp, Hein ;
van Hout-Wolters, Bernadette .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH AND EVALUATION, 2007, 13 (03) :203-220