Geophysical inversion for 3D contact surface geometry

被引:0
|
作者
Galley, Christopher G. [1 ]
Lelievre, Peter G. [2 ]
Farquharson, Colin G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Dept Earth Sci, St John, NF A1B 3X7, Canada
[2] Mt Allison Univ, Dept Math & Comp Sci, Sackville, NB E4L 1E4, Canada
关键词
TRIANGLE INTERSECTION TEST; SEISMIC TRAVEL-TIME; JOINT INVERSION; GRAVITY-DATA; FINITE-ELEMENT; MAGNETOTELLURIC DATA; CONSTRAINED INVERSION; HYBRID OPTIMIZATION; MAGNETIC DATA; MODEL;
D O I
10.1190/GEO2019-0614.1
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Geologists' interpretations about the earth typically involve distinct rock units with contacts between them. Three-dimensional geologic models typically comprise surfaces of tessellated polygons that represent the contacts. In contrast, geophysical inversions typically are performed on voxel meshes comprising space-filling elements. Standard minimum-structure voxel inversions recover smooth models, inconsistent with typical geologic interpretations. Various voxel inversion methods have been developed that attempt to produce models more consistent with such interpretations. However, many of those methods involve increased numerical challenges and ultimately the underlying parameterization of the earth is still inconsistent with geologists' interpretations. Surface geometry inversion (SGI) is a fundamentally different approach that effectively takes some initial surface-based model and alters the position of the contact surfaces to better fit the geophysical data. Many authors have developed SGI methods. In contrast to those, we are the first to develop a method with the following characteristics: we work directly with 3D explicit surfaces from an input geologic model of arbitrary complexity; we incorporate intersection detection methods to avoid unacceptable topological scenarios; we use global optimization strategies and stochastic sampling to solve the inverse problem and aid model assessment; and we use surface subdivision to reduce the number of model parameters, which also provides regularization without adding the complication of trade-off parameters in the objective function. We test our methods on simpler synthetic examples taken from early influential literature, and we demonstrate their typical use on a more complicated example based on a seafloor massive sulfide deposit. Our work provides a geophysical inversion approach that can work directly with 3D surface-based geologic models. With this approach, geophysical and geologic models can share the same parameterization; there is only a single model, with no need to translate information between two inconsistent parameterizations.
引用
收藏
页码:K27 / K45
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Segmentation and reconstruction of the 3D geometry of the middle and inner ear
    Lu, Yanfei
    II INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING SCIENCE (CMES'17), 2017, 15
  • [42] Simulation of human ischemic stroke in realistic 3D geometry
    Dumont, Thierry
    Duarte, Max
    Descombes, Stephane
    Dronne, Marie-Aimee
    Massot, Marc
    Louvet, Violaine
    COMMUNICATIONS IN NONLINEAR SCIENCE AND NUMERICAL SIMULATION, 2013, 18 (06) : 1539 - 1557
  • [43] Small nanoparticles, surface geometry and contact forces
    Takato, Yoichi
    Benson, Michael E.
    Sen, Surajit
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2018, 474 (2211):
  • [44] 3D gravity fast inversion based on Krylov subspace methods
    Yang, Min
    Xu, Xinqiang
    Wang, Wanyin
    Zhao, Dongming
    Zhou, Wei
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 21 (01) : 29 - 46
  • [45] 3D Inversion of Gravity Data for Obama Geothermal Field.
    Orouji, B.
    Toushmalani, Reza
    Abbasabadi, Leila
    RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 7 (06): : 1249 - 1253
  • [46] 3D inversion of airborne electromagnetic data using a moving footprint
    Cox, Leif H.
    Wilson, Glenn A.
    Zhdanov, Michael S.
    EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS, 2010, 41 (04) : 250 - 259
  • [47] 3D Gravity Inversion of Northern Sinai Peninsula: A Case Study
    Khalil, Mohamed A.
    Santos, Fernando M.
    PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2014, 171 (07) : 1557 - 1569
  • [48] 3D stochastic inversion of gravity data using cokriging and cosimulation
    Shamsipour, Pejman
    Marcotte, Denis
    Chouteau, Michel
    Keating, Pierre
    GEOPHYSICS, 2010, 75 (01) : I1 - I10
  • [49] Towards incorporating uncertainty of structural data in 3D geological inversion
    Wellmann, J. Florian
    Horowitz, Franklin G.
    Schill, Eva
    Regenauer-Lieb, Klaus
    TECTONOPHYSICS, 2010, 490 (3-4) : 141 - 151
  • [50] Schelling Points on 3D Surface Meshes
    Chen, Xiaobai
    Saparov, Abulhair
    Pang, Bill
    Funkhouser, Thomas
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON GRAPHICS, 2012, 31 (04):