Geophysical inversion for 3D contact surface geometry

被引:0
|
作者
Galley, Christopher G. [1 ]
Lelievre, Peter G. [2 ]
Farquharson, Colin G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Dept Earth Sci, St John, NF A1B 3X7, Canada
[2] Mt Allison Univ, Dept Math & Comp Sci, Sackville, NB E4L 1E4, Canada
关键词
TRIANGLE INTERSECTION TEST; SEISMIC TRAVEL-TIME; JOINT INVERSION; GRAVITY-DATA; FINITE-ELEMENT; MAGNETOTELLURIC DATA; CONSTRAINED INVERSION; HYBRID OPTIMIZATION; MAGNETIC DATA; MODEL;
D O I
10.1190/GEO2019-0614.1
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Geologists' interpretations about the earth typically involve distinct rock units with contacts between them. Three-dimensional geologic models typically comprise surfaces of tessellated polygons that represent the contacts. In contrast, geophysical inversions typically are performed on voxel meshes comprising space-filling elements. Standard minimum-structure voxel inversions recover smooth models, inconsistent with typical geologic interpretations. Various voxel inversion methods have been developed that attempt to produce models more consistent with such interpretations. However, many of those methods involve increased numerical challenges and ultimately the underlying parameterization of the earth is still inconsistent with geologists' interpretations. Surface geometry inversion (SGI) is a fundamentally different approach that effectively takes some initial surface-based model and alters the position of the contact surfaces to better fit the geophysical data. Many authors have developed SGI methods. In contrast to those, we are the first to develop a method with the following characteristics: we work directly with 3D explicit surfaces from an input geologic model of arbitrary complexity; we incorporate intersection detection methods to avoid unacceptable topological scenarios; we use global optimization strategies and stochastic sampling to solve the inverse problem and aid model assessment; and we use surface subdivision to reduce the number of model parameters, which also provides regularization without adding the complication of trade-off parameters in the objective function. We test our methods on simpler synthetic examples taken from early influential literature, and we demonstrate their typical use on a more complicated example based on a seafloor massive sulfide deposit. Our work provides a geophysical inversion approach that can work directly with 3D surface-based geologic models. With this approach, geophysical and geologic models can share the same parameterization; there is only a single model, with no need to translate information between two inconsistent parameterizations.
引用
收藏
页码:K27 / K45
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Towards 3D Full-Wave Inversion for GPR
    Watson, F.
    2016 IEEE RADAR CONFERENCE (RADARCONF), 2016, : 1348 - 1353
  • [32] 3D stochastic joint inversion of gravity and magnetic data
    Shamsipour, Pejman
    Marcotte, Denis
    Chouteau, Michel
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2012, 79 : 27 - 37
  • [33] 3D MT inversion based on model space compression
    Wang Qing
    Liu YunHe
    Yin ChangChun
    Li JinFeng
    Zhang Jie
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2019, 62 (02): : 752 - 762
  • [34] 2D inversion of 3D magnetotelluric data: The Kayabe dataset
    Xavier Garcia
    Juanjo Ledo
    Pilar Queralt
    Earth, Planets and Space, 1999, 51 : 1135 - 1143
  • [35] Geoelectric Joint Inversion for 3D Imaging of Vineyard Ground
    Lopane, Nicola
    Alberi, Matteo
    Barbagli, Alessio
    Chiarelli, Enrico
    Colonna, Tommaso
    Gallorini, Fabio
    Guastaldi, Enrico
    Mantovani, Fabio
    Petrone, Dario
    Pierini, Silvio
    Raptis, Kassandra Giulia Cristina
    Strati, Virginia
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2024, 14 (11):
  • [36] Normal contact for 3D real joint interfaces
    Li, Peng-Yang
    An, Wu-Run
    Peng, Pan
    Wang, Quan-Dai
    Fu, Wei-Ping
    Li, Yan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHANICS AND MECHATRONICS (ICMM 2015), 2016, : 433 - 444
  • [37] Contact mechanics at the nanoscale, a 3D multiscale approach
    Anciaux, Guillaume
    Molinari, Jean-Francois
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2009, 79 (09) : 1041 - 1067
  • [38] 3D inversion of surface magnetotelluric resistivity data using nonlinear conjugate gradients combined with the impressing method
    Weng Ai-Hua
    Li Si-Rui
    Yang Yue
    Li Da-Jun
    Li Jian-Ping
    Li Shi-Wen
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2017, 60 (05): : 1903 - 1917
  • [39] Fast 3D inversion of gravity data using solution space priorconditioned lanczos bidiagonalization
    Rezaie, Mohammad
    Moradzadeh, Ali
    Kalateh, Ali Nejati
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 136 : 42 - 50
  • [40] Integrating geological constraints into 3D geophysical inversions using unstructured meshes
    Lelievre, Peter G.
    Farquharson, Colin G.
    Tycholiz, Cassandra J.
    MINERAL DEPOSIT RESEARCH FOR A HIGH-TECH WORLD, VOLS. 1-4, 2013, : 146 - 149