Geophysical inversion for 3D contact surface geometry

被引:0
|
作者
Galley, Christopher G. [1 ]
Lelievre, Peter G. [2 ]
Farquharson, Colin G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Dept Earth Sci, St John, NF A1B 3X7, Canada
[2] Mt Allison Univ, Dept Math & Comp Sci, Sackville, NB E4L 1E4, Canada
关键词
TRIANGLE INTERSECTION TEST; SEISMIC TRAVEL-TIME; JOINT INVERSION; GRAVITY-DATA; FINITE-ELEMENT; MAGNETOTELLURIC DATA; CONSTRAINED INVERSION; HYBRID OPTIMIZATION; MAGNETIC DATA; MODEL;
D O I
10.1190/GEO2019-0614.1
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Geologists' interpretations about the earth typically involve distinct rock units with contacts between them. Three-dimensional geologic models typically comprise surfaces of tessellated polygons that represent the contacts. In contrast, geophysical inversions typically are performed on voxel meshes comprising space-filling elements. Standard minimum-structure voxel inversions recover smooth models, inconsistent with typical geologic interpretations. Various voxel inversion methods have been developed that attempt to produce models more consistent with such interpretations. However, many of those methods involve increased numerical challenges and ultimately the underlying parameterization of the earth is still inconsistent with geologists' interpretations. Surface geometry inversion (SGI) is a fundamentally different approach that effectively takes some initial surface-based model and alters the position of the contact surfaces to better fit the geophysical data. Many authors have developed SGI methods. In contrast to those, we are the first to develop a method with the following characteristics: we work directly with 3D explicit surfaces from an input geologic model of arbitrary complexity; we incorporate intersection detection methods to avoid unacceptable topological scenarios; we use global optimization strategies and stochastic sampling to solve the inverse problem and aid model assessment; and we use surface subdivision to reduce the number of model parameters, which also provides regularization without adding the complication of trade-off parameters in the objective function. We test our methods on simpler synthetic examples taken from early influential literature, and we demonstrate their typical use on a more complicated example based on a seafloor massive sulfide deposit. Our work provides a geophysical inversion approach that can work directly with 3D surface-based geologic models. With this approach, geophysical and geologic models can share the same parameterization; there is only a single model, with no need to translate information between two inconsistent parameterizations.
引用
收藏
页码:K27 / K45
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] 3D gravity inversion in frequency domain based on mixed L1+L2 norm
    Zhao GuangDong
    Wang XuBen
    Liu JianXin
    Liang ShengXian
    Li Jun
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2024, 67 (04): : 1627 - 1640
  • [22] 3D inversion of gravity data with unstructured mesh and least-squares QR-factorization (LSQR)
    Danaei, Khatereh
    Moradzadeh, Ali
    Norouzi, Gholam-Hossain
    Smith, Richard
    Abedi, Maysam
    Fam, Hossein Jodeiri Akbari
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2022, 206
  • [23] 3D Time-lapse resistivity inversion
    Tao, Tao
    Han, Peng
    Ma, Huan
    Tan, HanDong
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2024, 67 (10):
  • [24] Practical Tips for 3D Regional Gravity Inversion
    Sampietro, Daniele
    Capponi, Martina
    GEOSCIENCES, 2019, 9 (08)
  • [25] Geophysical modeling of La Primavera caldera and its relation to volcanology activity based on 3D susceptibility inversion and potential data analysis
    Almaguer, Joselin
    Lopez-Loera, Hector
    Luis Macias, Jose
    Saucedo, Ricardo
    Yutsis, Vsevolod
    Guevara, Randall
    JOURNAL OF VOLCANOLOGY AND GEOTHERMAL RESEARCH, 2020, 393
  • [26] A 3D contact analysis approach for the visualization of the electrical contact asperities
    Roussos, Constantinos C.
    Swingler, Jonathan
    AIP ADVANCES, 2017, 7 (01)
  • [27] Magnetic surface geometry inversion of Kimberlites in Botswana
    Vatankhah, Saeed
    Lelievre, Peter G.
    Matende, Kitso
    Mickus, Kevin
    GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2024, 72 (09) : 3524 - 3546
  • [28] Cooperative geophysical inversion integrated with 3-D geological modelling in the Boulia region, QLD
    Rashidifard M.
    Giraud J.
    Lindsay M.
    Jessell M.
    Geophysical Journal International, 2024, 238 (02) : 860 - 880
  • [29] 3D modelling of Trompsburg Complex (in South Africa) using 3D focusing inversion of gravity data
    Rezaie, Mohammad
    Moradzadeh, Ali
    Kalate, Ali Nejati
    Aghajani, Hamid
    Kahoo, Amin Roshandel
    Moazam, Sahar
    JOURNAL OF AFRICAN EARTH SCIENCES, 2017, 130 : 1 - 7
  • [30] An Improved Approach for 3D Rolling Contact Fatigue Simulations with Microstructure Topology
    Bomidi, John A. R.
    Weinzapfel, Nick
    Sadeghi, Farshid
    Liebel, Alexander
    Weber, Joerg
    TRIBOLOGY TRANSACTIONS, 2013, 56 (03) : 385 - 399