Generation of 3-D hydrostratigraphic zones from dense airborne electromagnetic data to assess groundwater model prediction error

被引:27
作者
Christensen, N. K. [1 ]
Minsley, B. J. [2 ]
Christensen, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Geosci, Aarhus, Denmark
[2] US Geol Survey, Crustal Geophys & Geochem Sci Ctr, Box 25046, Denver, CO 80225 USA
关键词
groundwater modeling; prediction uncertainty; geological structural uncertainty; AEM data; stochastic geological models; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; GEOPHYSICAL-DATA; BAYESIAN-APPROACH; INVERSION; FLOW; UNCERTAINTY; SIMULATION; TRANSIENT; INTEGRATION; RESOLUTION;
D O I
10.1002/2016WR019141
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We present a new methodology to combine spatially dense high-resolution airborne electromagnetic (AEM) data and sparse borehole information to construct multiple plausible geological structures using a stochastic approach. The method developed allows for quantification of the performance of groundwater models built from different geological realizations of structure. Multiple structural realizations are generated using geostatistical Monte Carlo simulations that treat sparse borehole lithological observations as hard data and dense geophysically derived structural probabilities as soft data. Each structural model is used to define 3-D hydrostratigraphical zones of a groundwater model, and the hydraulic parameter values of the zones are estimated by using nonlinear regression to fit hydrological data (hydraulic head and river discharge measurements). Use of the methodology is demonstrated for a synthetic domain having structures of categorical deposits consisting of sand, silt, or clay. It is shown that using dense AEM data with the methodology can significantly improve the estimated accuracy of the sediment distribution as compared to when borehole data are used alone. It is also shown that this use of AEM data can improve the predictive capability of a calibrated groundwater model that uses the geological structures as zones. However, such structural models will always contain errors because even with dense AEM data it is not possible to perfectly resolve the structures of a groundwater system. It is shown that when using such erroneous structures in a groundwater model, they can lead to biased parameter estimates and biased model predictions, therefore impairing the model's predictive capability.
引用
收藏
页码:1019 / 1038
页数:20
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, MODFLOW 2000 US GEOL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, GSLIB Geostatistical software library and users guide
[3]   A resolution study of buried valleys using laterally constrained inversion of TEM data [J].
Auken, Esben ;
Christiansen, Anders V. ;
Jacobsen, Lars H. ;
Sorensen, Kurt I. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2008, 65 (01) :10-20
[4]  
Beven K., 2009, Environmental Modelling: An Uncertain Future
[5]  
Carle S.F., 1999, T-PROGS: Transition probability geostatistical software
[6]   Transition probability-based indicator geostatistics [J].
Carle, SF ;
Fogg, GE .
MATHEMATICAL GEOLOGY, 1996, 28 (04) :453-476
[7]   Testing alternative uses of electromagnetic data to reduce the prediction error of groundwater models [J].
Christensen, Nikolaj Kruse ;
Christensen, Steen ;
Ferre, Ty Paul A. .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2016, 20 (05) :1925-1946
[8]   Prediction of regional ground water flow to streams [J].
Christensen, S ;
Rasmussen, K ;
Moller, K .
GROUND WATER, 1998, 36 (02) :351-360
[9]   Bias and uncertainty in regression-calibrated models of groundwater flow in heterogeneous media [J].
Cooley, RL ;
Christensen, S .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2006, 29 (05) :639-656
[10]   Including geophysical data in ground water model inverse calibration [J].
Dam, D ;
Christensen, S .
GROUND WATER, 2003, 41 (02) :178-189