Mapping pedagogical touchpoints: Exploring online student engagement and course design

被引:29
作者
Tualaulelei, Eseta [1 ]
Burke, Katie [1 ]
Fanshawe, Melissa [2 ]
Cameron, Cathy [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Southern Queensland, Sch Educ, Toowoomba, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Southern Queensland, Off Adv Learning & Teaching OALT, Toowoomba, Qld, Australia
关键词
online course design; online learners; pedagogical touchpoints; student engagement; undergraduate; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1177/1469787421990847
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Online learning has been widely adopted in higher education but there is a need to better understand the nature of student engagement with online courses. For example, there are questions about whether students engage with courses as educators intend and what features of online courses engage students to enhance learning. Bringing together student and educator perspectives, this article reports on a study that identified 'pedagogical touchpoints' - opportunities within online courses for student engagement - to ascertain whether a better understanding of these could improve online course design and student engagement. Data were collected across three undergraduate online courses. Data analysis produced three key findings: mapping pedagogical touchpoints against dimensions of engagement reveals patterns that may inform enhanced course design, students' engagement with pedagogical touchpoints varies according to their learning needs and desires, and mapping pedagogical touchpoints can inform course design at both conceptual and practical levels. Discussion of the findings highlights that purposeful design of online courses, including strategic planning for pedagogical touchpoints, can maximise the potential for student engagement and consequent learning.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 203
页数:15
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Retention in Online Courses: Exploring Issues and Solutions-A Literature Review [J].
Bawa, Papia .
SAGE OPEN, 2016, 6 (01)
[2]   Using the “Indicators of Engaged Learning Online” Framework to Evaluate Online Course Quality [J].
Bigatel P.M. ;
Edel-Malizia S. .
TechTrends, 2018, 62 (1) :58-70
[3]  
Brumby, 2014, REITAKU J INTERDISCI, V22, P15, DOI DOI 10.4102/AC.V14I1.232
[4]   The Value of Student Engagement for Higher Education Quality Assurance [J].
Coates, Hamish .
QUALITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2005, 11 (01) :25-36
[5]   Foundations of dynamic learning analytics: Using university student data to increase retention [J].
de Freitas, Sara ;
Gibson, David ;
Du Plessis, Coert ;
Halloran, Pat ;
Williams, Ed ;
Ambrose, Matt ;
Dunwell, Ian ;
Arnab, Sylvester .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 46 (06) :1175-1188
[6]  
Dixson MD, 2015, ONLINE LEARN, V19, P143
[7]   Exploring new elements of the student approaches to learning framework: The role of online learning technologies in student learning [J].
Ellis, Robert A. ;
Bliuc, Ana-Marie .
ACTIVE LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 20 (01) :11-24
[8]  
Flick U., 2014, Qualitative Sozialforschung. Eine Einfuhrung, V5, DOI DOI 10.1109/TVCG.2007.70541
[9]   Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions [J].
Garrison, D. Randy ;
Arbaugh, J.B. .
Internet and Higher Education, 2007, 10 (03) :157-172
[10]  
Garrison DR, 2011, E-LEARNING IN THE 21ST CENTURY: A FRAMEWORK FOR RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, SECOND EDITION, P1