Individualised physiotherapy as an adjunct to guideline-based advice for low back disorders in primary care: a randomised controlled trial

被引:35
作者
Ford, Jon J. [1 ]
Hahne, Andrew J. [1 ]
Surkitt, Luke D. [1 ]
Chan, Alexander Y. P. [1 ]
Richards, Matthew C. [1 ]
Slater, Sarah L. [1 ]
Hinman, Rana S. [2 ]
Pizzari, Tania [1 ]
Davidson, Megan [1 ]
Taylor, Nicholas F. [1 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, Coll Sci Hlth & Engn, Low Back Res Team, Bundoora, Vic 3085, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Sch Hlth Sci, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
关键词
PAIN CLINICAL-TRIALS; SCREENING QUESTIONNAIRE; IMMPACT RECOMMENDATIONS; RESPONSIVENESS; MANAGEMENT; CLASSIFICATION; RELIABILITY; SUBACUTE; SCIATICA; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1136/bjsports-2015-095058
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Background Many patients with low-back disorders persisting beyond 6 weeks do not recover. This study investigates whether individualised physiotherapy plus guideline-based advice results in superior outcomes to advice alone in participants with low-back disorders. Methods This prospective parallel group multicentre randomised controlled trial was set in 16 primary care physiotherapy practices in Melbourne, Australia. Random assignment resulted in 156 participants receiving 10 sessions of physiotherapy that was individualised based on pathoanatomical, psychosocial and neurophysiological barriers to recovery combined with guideline-based advice, and 144 participants receiving 2 sessions of physiotherapist-delivered advice alone. Primary outcomes were activity limitation (Oswestry Disability Index) and numerical rating scales for back and leg pain at 5, 10, 26 and 52 weeks postbaseline. Analyses were by intention-to-treat using linear mixed models. Results Between-group differences showed significant effects favouring individualised physiotherapy for back and leg pain at 10 weeks (back: 1.3, 95% CI 0.8 to 1.8; leg: 1.1, 95% CI 0.5 to 1.7) and 26 weeks (back: 0.9, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.4; leg: 1.0, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.6). Oswestry favoured individualised physiotherapy at 10 weeks (4.7; 95% CI 2.0 to 7.5), 26 weeks (5.4; 95% CI 2.6 to 8.2) and 52 weeks (4.3; 95% CI 1.4 to 7.1). Responder analysis at 52 weeks showed participants receiving individualised physiotherapy were more likely to improve by a clinically important amount of 50% from baseline for Oswestry (relative risk (RR=1.3) 1.5; 95% CI 1.2 to 1.8) and back pain (RR 1.3; 95% CI 1.2 to 1.8) than participants receiving advice alone. Conclusions 10 sessions of individualised physiotherapy was more effective than 2 sessions of advice alone in participants with low-back disorders of >= 6 weeks and <= 6 months duration. Between-group changes were sustained at 12 months for activity limitation and 6 months for back and leg pain and were likely to be clinically significant.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 245
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Preliminary evidence for the features of non-reducible discogenic low back pain: survey of an international physiotherapy expert panel with the Delphi technique [J].
Chan, A. Y. P. ;
Ford, J. J. ;
McMeeken, J. M. ;
Wilde, V. E. .
PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2013, 99 (03) :212-220
[2]   Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain [J].
Childs, JD ;
Piva, SR ;
Fritz, JM .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (11) :1331-1334
[3]  
Cooke G, 2013, AUST FAM PHYSICIAN, V42, P65
[4]   A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally [J].
Dagenais, Simon ;
Caro, Jaime ;
Haldeman, Scott .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 8 (01) :8-20
[5]   Synthesis of recommendations for the assessment and management of low back pain from recent clinical practice guidelines [J].
Dagenais, Simon ;
Tricco, Andrea C. ;
Haldeman, Scott .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2010, 10 (06) :514-529
[6]   Report of the NIH Task Force on Research Standards for Chronic Low Back Pain [J].
Deyo, Richard A. ;
Dworkin, Samuel F. ;
Amtmann, Dagmar ;
Andersson, Gunnar ;
Borenstein, David ;
Carragee, Eugene ;
Carrino, John ;
Chou, Roger ;
Cook, Karon ;
DeLitto, Anthony ;
Goertz, Christine ;
Khalsa, Partap ;
Loeser, John ;
Mackey, Sean ;
Panagis, James ;
Rainville, James ;
Tosteson, Tor ;
Turk, Dennis ;
Von Korff, Michael ;
Weinertt, Debra K. .
JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2014, 15 (06) :569-585
[7]   Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations [J].
Dworkin, RH ;
Turk, DC ;
Farrar, JT ;
Haythornthwaite, JA ;
Jensen, MP ;
Katz, NP ;
Kerns, RD ;
Stucki, G ;
Allen, RR ;
Bellamy, N ;
Carr, DB ;
Chandler, J ;
Cowan, P ;
Dionne, R ;
Galer, BS ;
Hertz, S ;
Jadad, AR ;
Kramer, LD ;
Manning, DC ;
Martin, S ;
McCormick, CG ;
McDermott, MP ;
McGrath, P ;
Quessy, S ;
Rappaport, BA ;
Robbins, W ;
Robinson, JP ;
Rothman, M ;
Royal, MA ;
Simon, L ;
Stauffer, JW ;
Stein, W ;
Tollett, J ;
Wernicke, J ;
Witter, J .
PAIN, 2005, 113 (1-2) :9-19
[8]   Interpreting the clinical importance of group differences in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations [J].
Dworkin, Robert H. ;
Turk, Dennis C. ;
McDermott, Michael P. ;
Peirce-Sandner, Sarah ;
Burke, Laurie B. ;
Cowan, Penney ;
Farrar, John T. ;
Hertz, Sharon ;
Raja, Srinivasa N. ;
Rappaport, Bob A. ;
Rauschkolb, Christine ;
Sampaio, Cristina .
PAIN, 2009, 146 (03) :238-244
[9]   What does 'clinically important' really mean? [J].
Ferreira, Manuela L. ;
Herbert, Robert D. .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2008, 54 (04) :229-230
[10]   Validation of a minimum outcome core set in the evaluation of patients with back pain [J].
Ferrer, Montserrat ;
Pellise, Ferran ;
Escudero, Oscar ;
Alvarez, Luis ;
Pont, Angels ;
Alonso, Jordi ;
Deyo, Richard .
SPINE, 2006, 31 (12) :1372-1379