Psychometric Properties of the Polish Version of the 36-Item WHODAS 2.0 in Patients with Low Back Pain

被引:10
作者
Cwirlej-Sozanska, Agnieszka [1 ]
Bejer, Agnieszka [1 ]
Wisniowska-Szurlej, Agnieszka [1 ]
Wilmowska-Pietruszynska, Anna [2 ]
de Sire, Alessandro [3 ,4 ]
Spalek, Renata [4 ,5 ]
Sozanski, Bernard [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rzeszow, Coll Med Sci, Inst Hlth Sci, Rejtana16C, PL-35959 Rzeszow, Poland
[2] Lazarski Univ, Fac Med, Swieradowska St 43, PL-02662 Warsaw, Poland
[3] Univ Piemonte Orientale, Dept Hlth Sci, Phys & Rehabil Med, Viale Piazza DArmi 1, I-28100 Novara, Italy
[4] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Ctr Geriatr Med CEMI, Inst Internal Med & Geriatr, Dept Geriatr Neurosci Orthoped, Lgo F Vito 8, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[5] Mons L Novarese Hosp, Rehabil Unit, Str Sotto Cerca, I-13040 Vercelli, Italy
关键词
ICF; disability; low back pain; rehabilitation; validity; reliability; DISABILITY ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION; ABSOLUTE RELIABILITY; HEALTH; VALIDATION; DEPRESSION; VALIDITY; RESPONSIVENESS; QUESTIONNAIRE;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph17197284
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) is considered by the World Health Organization (WHO) to be a useful tool for assessing the functioning and disability of the general population as well as the effectiveness of the applied interventions. Until this study, no data regarding the validity of the 36-item WHODAS 2.0 in chronic low back pain (LBP) in Poland have been explored. This study was conducted on 92 patients suffering from chronic LBP admitted to the rehabilitation ward. The Polish version of the 36-item WHODAS 2.0, the Sf-36 Health Survey (SF-36), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) questionnaires were applied to assess patients. The scale score reliability of the entire tool for the study population was very high. The Cronbach's alpha test result for the entire scale was 0.92. For the overall result of the WHODAS 2.0, the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC1,2) was 0.928, which confirmed that the scale was consistent over time. The total result and the vast majority of domains of the 36-item WHODAS 2.0 correlated negatively with domains of the SF-36 questionnaire; thus, a higher WHODAS 2.0 score was associated with a lower score on the SF-36 questionnaire. We found that the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the total WHODAS 2.0 score in patients after rehabilitation for LBP was 4.87. Overall, the results indicated that the Polish version of the 36-item WHODAS is suitable for assessing health and disability status in patients with LBP.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 17
页数:17
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [1] Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain
    Andersson, GBJ
    [J]. LANCET, 1999, 354 (9178) : 581 - 585
  • [2] [Anonymous], REH MEAS DAT
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2018, ICD11 MMS
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1994, PSYCHOMETRIC THEORY
  • [5] Self-reported disability according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Low Back Pain Core Set: Test-retest agreement and reliability
    Bagraith, Karl S.
    Strong, Jenny
    Meredith, Pamela J.
    McPhail, Steven M.
    [J]. DISABILITY AND HEALTH JOURNAL, 2017, 10 (04) : 621 - 626
  • [6] Rasch analysis supported the construct validity of self-report measures of activity and participation derived from patient ratings of the ICF low back pain core set
    Bagraith, Karl S.
    Strong, Jenny
    Meredith, Pamela J.
    McPhail, Steven M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 84 : 161 - 172
  • [7] The clinimetric properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II in early inflammatory arthritis
    Baron, Murray
    Schieir, Orit
    Hudson, Marie
    Steele, Russell
    Kolahi, Sousan
    Berkson, Laeora
    Couture, Francois
    Fitzcharles, M. A.
    Gagne, Michel
    Garfield, Bruce
    Gutkowski, Andrzej
    Kang, Harb
    Kapusta, Morton
    Ligier, Sophie
    Mathieu, Jean-Pierre
    Menard, Henri
    Starr, Michael
    Stein, Michael
    Zummer, Michel
    [J]. ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2008, 59 (03): : 382 - 390
  • [8] Large differences in cost of illness and wellbeing between patients with fibromyalgia, chronic low back pain, or ankylosing spondylitis
    Boonen, A
    van den Heuvel, R
    van Tubergen, A
    Goossens, M
    Severens, JL
    van der Heijde, D
    van der Linden, S
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2005, 64 (03) : 396 - 402
  • [9] Validation of the World Health Organization Assessment Schedule II Chinese Traditional Version (WHODAS II CT) in persons with disabilities and chronic illnesses for Chinese population
    Cheung, Mike K. T.
    Hung, Anchor T. F.
    Poon, Peter K. K.
    Fong, Daniel Y. T.
    Li, Leonard S. W.
    Chow, Eddie S. L.
    Qiu, Zhuo-Ying
    Liou, Tsan-Hon
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2015, 37 (20) : 1902 - 1907
  • [10] Development of traditional Chinese version of World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 36-item (WHODAS 2.0) in Taiwan: Validity and reliability analyses
    Chiu, Tzu-Ying
    Yen, Chia-Feng
    Chou, Cheng-Hsiu
    Lin, Jin-Ding
    Hwang, Ai-Wen
    Liao, Hua-Fang
    Chi, Wen-Chou
    [J]. RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2014, 35 (11) : 2812 - 2820