Assessing the Validity and Reliability of the Perceptions of the Consent to Sex Scale

被引:173
作者
Jozkowski, Kristen N. [1 ]
Peterson, Zoe D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas, Dept Hlth Human Performance & Recreat, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
[2] Univ Missouri St Louis, Dept Psychol, St Louis, MO USA
关键词
EXPLORATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; RAPE-MYTH-ACCEPTANCE; TOKEN RESISTANCE; DATE RAPE; COLLEGE; WOMEN; VICTIMIZATION; AGGRESSION; PREVALENCE; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1080/00224499.2012.757282
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Although sexual assault prevention education tends to focus on consent promotion as a means to reduce rates of sexual assault, little is known about how college students consent to sexual activity. The current study aimed to better understand college students' consent via the systematic development of the Consent to Sex Scale (CSS), utilizing mixed methods via three phases and two waves of data collection. In Phase 1, qualitative data were collected from college students (n = 185) to provide a foundation for item writing. In Phase 2, closed-ended items were written for a quantitative instrument and reviewed by a team of experts. In Phase 3, a quantitative survey, including items written in Phase 2, was administered to college students (n = 685); the measure was assessed for its psychometric properties. Exploratory factor analysis was utilized, resulting in a five-factor solution. The CSS and corresponding factors demonstrated high internal consistency reliability and expected gender differences, supporting the construct validity of the measure. The CSS assesses college students' cues for indicating consent to sex, a construct not addressed by previous measures. The validated scale may be useful in future research to better understand how consent relates to other behaviors or constructs.
引用
收藏
页码:632 / 645
页数:14
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Sexual assault on campus: A multilevel, integrative approach to party rape [J].
Armstrong, Elizabeth A. ;
Hamilton, Laura ;
Sweeney, Brian .
SOCIAL PROBLEMS, 2006, 53 (04) :483-499
[2]   'Spontaneous' sexual consent: An analysis of sexual consent literature [J].
Beres, Melanie A. .
FEMINISM & PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 17 (01) :93-108
[3]  
Bogle K.A., 2008, HOOKING SEX DATING R
[4]   Sexual assault prevalence, reporting and policies: Comparing college and university campuses and military service academies [J].
Brubaker, Sarah Jane .
SECURITY JOURNAL, 2009, 22 (01) :56-72
[5]   CULTURAL MYTHS AND SUPPORTS FOR RAPE [J].
BURT, MR .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1980, 38 (02) :217-230
[6]   Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development [J].
Clark, LA ;
Watson, D .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1995, 7 (03) :309-319
[7]   THE EIGENVALUES-GREATER-THAN-ONE RULE AND THE RELIABILITY OF COMPONENTS [J].
CLIFF, N .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (02) :276-279
[8]  
Comrey A. L., 1992, A first course in factor analysis
[9]  
Costello A. B., 2005, Best practices in quantitative methods, V10, P7, DOI [DOI 10.7275/JYJ1-4868, 10.7275/jyj1-4868, DOI 10.4135/9781412995627]
[10]   The violent and sexual victimization of college women - Is repeat victimization a problem? [J].
Daigle, Leah E. ;
Fisher, Bonnie S. ;
Cullen, Francis T. .
JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE, 2008, 23 (09) :1296-1313