A new simplified Hypothesis B method for calculating consolidation settlements of double soil layers exhibiting creep

被引:45
作者
Feng, W. -Q. [1 ,2 ]
Yin, J. -H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] PolyU Shenzhen Res Inst, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
double soil layers; consolidation settlement; creep; visco-plastic; ONE-DIMENSIONAL CONSOLIDATION; ELASTIC-VISCOPLASTIC MODEL; TIME-DEPENDENT BEHAVIOR; STRESS-STRAIN BEHAVIOR; HONG-KONG; SECONDARY COMPRESSION; VERTICAL DRAINS; CLAYS; EMBANKMENT;
D O I
10.1002/nag.2635
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
This paper presents a new simplified method, based on Hypothesis B, for calculating the consolidation settlements of double soil layers exhibiting creep. In the new simplified Hypothesis B method, different stress-strain states including over-consolidation and normal consolidation states can be considered with the help of the 'equivalent time' concept. Zhu and Yin method and US Navy method are adopted to calculate the average degree of consolidation for a double soil layer profile. This new simplified Hypothesis B method is then used to calculate the consolidation settlements of double soil layers, which have two different total thicknesses of soil layer (4m and 8m) and three different OCR values (Over-Consolidation Ratio, OCR=1, 1.5 and 2). The accuracy and verification of this new simplified method are examined by comparing the calculated results with simulation results from a fully coupled finite element (FE) program using a soft soil creep model. Four cases of double layer soil profiles are analyzed. Hypothesis A method with US Navy method for the average degree of consolidation has also been used to for calculating consolidation settlements of the same cases. For Case I(4m) and Case III(8m), it is found that curves of the new simplified Hypothesis B method using both Zhu and Yin method and US Navy method are very close to the results from FE simulations with the relative errors within 8.5%. For Case II(4m) and Case IV(8m), it is found that curves of the new simplified Hypothesis B method using Zhu and Yin method agree better with results from FE simulations with the relative errors within 11.7% than curves of the new simplified Hypothesis B method adopting US Navy method with the relative error up to 36.1%. Curves of Hypothesis A method adopting US Navy method have the relative error up to 55.0% among all four cases. In overall, the new simplified Hypothesis B method is suitable for calculation of consolidation settlements of double soil layers exhibiting creep, in which, Zhu and Yin method is recommended to obtain the average degree of consolidation. Copyright (C) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:899 / 917
页数:19
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [11] Effective stress in double porous media with two immiscible fluids
    Khalili, N
    Witt, R
    Laloui, L
    Vulliet, L
    Koliji, A
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2005, 32 (15)
  • [12] New basis for the constitutive modelling of aggregated soils
    Koliji, Azad
    Vulliet, Laurent
    Laloui, Lyesse
    [J]. ACTA GEOTECHNICA, 2008, 3 (01) : 61 - 69
  • [13] GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS OFFSHORE HONG-KONG
    KOUTSOFTAS, DC
    FOOTT, R
    HANDFELT, LD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1987, 113 (02): : 87 - 105
  • [14] Ladd C.C., 1977, Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, V2, P421
  • [15] Anisotropic creep model for soft soils
    Leoni, M.
    Karstunen, M.
    Vermeer, P. A.
    [J]. GEOTECHNIQUE, 2008, 58 (03): : 215 - 226
  • [16] Leroueil S., 2006, P 13 DANUBE EUROPEAN, P55
  • [17] Closure to "secondary compression" by G. Mesri and B. Vardhanabhuti
    Mesri, G.
    Vardhanabhuti, B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 132 (06) : 817 - 818
  • [18] MESRI G, 1979, J GEOTECH ENG-ASCE, V105, P106
  • [19] EFFECTS OF FRICTION AND THICKNESS ON LONG-TERM CONSOLIDATION BEHAVIOR OF OSAKA BAY CLAYS
    Mesri, Gholamreza
    [J]. SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS, 2009, 49 (05) : 823 - 824
  • [20] Mitchell K., 2005, FUNDAMENTALS SOIL BE