Instrumented anterior lumbar interbody fusion with equine bone protein extract

被引:14
|
作者
Li, Haisheng
Zou, Xuenong
Springer, Marco
Briest, Arne
Lind, Martin
Buenger, Cody
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Orthopaed Res Lab, Orthopaed Dept E, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[2] OSSACUR AG, Oberstenfeld, Germany
关键词
bone substitute; lumbar spine; spine fusion; porcine model; equine bone protein extract;
D O I
10.1097/01.brs.0000255210.67616.2b
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Randomized and self-controlled study with anterior lumbar interbody fusion in a porcine model. Objective. To determine the osteoinductive potential of an equine bone protein extract in anterior interbody spinal fusion. Summary of Background Data. Interbody spinal fusion with bone graft transplantation is a common spine procedure. Complications related to bone graft harvesting are still a major concern. Equine demineralized bone matrix has been reported to be osteoinductive. However, the application of equine bone protein extract in spine fusion has not been documented. In this experiment, we evaluated equine bone protein extract in a porcine spinal fusion model. Methods. Due to their size and availability, we chose 12 normal Danish landrace pigs, each weighing 50 kg, as our experimental animals. Lumbar spine interbody fusion of L3/4, L4/5 using titanium alloy cages and pedicle screws instrumentation was performed on each pig. Cages packed with either autograft or equine bone protein extract (COLLOSS (R) E; OSSACUR AG, Oberstenfeld, Germany) were randomly assigned to the 2 levels anteriorly. The pigs were followed for 3 months. After sacrifice, radiograph, microcomputed tomography, and histomorphometry were used to evaluate the spine segments. Results. All pigs went through the observation without major complications. Radiograph examination after 12 weeks revealed no implant breakage, loosening, or spinal deformity. Microcomputed tomography scanning showed that cages with COLLOSS (R) E had the same fusion rate (11/12) as those with autograft. Three-dimensional evaluation from microcomputed tomography found a significant difference only in trabecular thickness; trabeculae from COLLOSS (R) E-filled cages were much thinner (P = 0.04). Histologic evaluations demonstrated longitudinally formed bone trabeculae in both autograft and COLLOSS (R) E-filled cages. Bone volume calculation from histomorphometry correlates well with that from microcomputed tomography results (R = 0.5; P = 0.01). Conclusion. In this porcine model, COLLOSS (R) E is as effective as autograft for anterior spinal fusion.
引用
收藏
页码:E126 / E129
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The role of Osteocel Plus as a fusion substrate in minimally invasive instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Ammerman, Joshua M.
    Libricz, Joseph
    Ammerman, Matthew D.
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 115 (07) : 991 - 994
  • [22] Anterior lumbar interbody fusion: Indications, technique, advantages and disadvantages
    M. Richter
    M. Weidenfeld
    F.P. Uckmann
    Der Orthopäde, 2015, 44 (2): : 154 - 161
  • [23] LAPAROSCOPIC DISKECTOMY WITH ANTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION - A PRELIMINARY REVIEW
    MATHEWS, HH
    EVANS, MT
    MOLLIGAN, HJ
    LONG, BH
    SPINE, 1995, 20 (16) : 1797 - 1802
  • [24] Animal Model for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Literature Review
    Yoshizato, Hiromu
    Morimoto, Tadatsugu
    Nonaka, Toshihiro
    Otani, Koji
    Kobayashi, Takaomi
    Nakashima, Takema
    Hirata, Hirohito
    Tsukamoto, Masatsugu
    Mawatari, Masaaki
    SPINE SURGERY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2024, 8 (04): : 373 - 382
  • [25] Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Two-Year Results with a Modular Interbody Device
    Jackson, Keith Lynn
    Yeoman, Chevas
    Chung, Woosik M.
    Chappuis, James L.
    Freedman, Brett
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 8 (05) : 591 - 598
  • [26] Risk Factors for Subsidence Following Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Zavras, Athan G.
    Federico, Vincent
    Nolte, Michael T.
    Butler, Alexander J.
    Dandu, Navya
    Munim, Mohammed
    Harper, Daniel E.
    Lopez, Gregory D.
    DeWald, Christopher J.
    An, Howard S.
    Singh, Kern
    Phillips, Frank M.
    Colman, Matthew W.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 14 (01) : 257 - 264
  • [27] Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery
    Yaylali, Ilker
    Ju, Hongbin
    Yoo, Jung
    Ching, Alexander
    Hart, Robert
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 31 (04) : 352 - 355
  • [28] Fusion and subsidence rate of stand alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion using PEEK cage with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2
    Eyal Behrbalk
    Ofir Uri
    Ruth M. Parks
    Rachel Musson
    Reuben Chee Cheong Soh
    Bronek Maximilian Boszczyk
    European Spine Journal, 2013, 22 : 2869 - 2875
  • [29] Fusion and subsidence rate of stand alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion using PEEK cage with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2
    Behrbalk, Eyal
    Uri, Ofir
    Parks, Ruth M.
    Musson, Rachel
    Soh, Reuben Chee Cheong
    Boszczyk, Bronek Maximilian
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2013, 22 (12) : 2869 - 2875
  • [30] Risk of sympathectomy after anterior and lateral lumbar interbody fusion procedures
    Hrabalek, Lumir
    Sternbersky, Jan
    Adamus, Milan
    BIOMEDICAL PAPERS-OLOMOUC, 2015, 159 (02): : 318 - 326