Do government-experienced auditors reduce audit quality?

被引:5
|
作者
Ocak, Murat [1 ]
Can, Gokberk [2 ]
机构
[1] Trakya Univ, Edirne, Turkey
[2] Amer Univ Middle East, Coll Business Adm, Kuwait, Kuwait
关键词
Government-experienced auditors; Overall experience; Audit quality; Aggressiveness; Reporting lag; Discretionary accruals; Auditor characteristics; Turkey; Borsa Istanbul; M40; M41; M42; M49; EARNINGS MANAGEMENT; INDIVIDUAL AUDITORS; INDUSTRY EXPERTISE; PARTNER TENURE; BIG; IMPACT; IDENTIFICATION; INDEPENDENCE; PERFORMANCE; OWNERSHIP;
D O I
10.1108/MAJ-12-2017-1756
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Purpose Recent studies regarding auditor experience generally focus on auditor overall experience in accounting, auditing, finance and related fields (Hardies et al., 2014), auditor sector and domain experience (Bedard and Biggs, 1991; Hammersley, 2006), auditor experience as CPA (Ye et al., 2014; Sonu et al., 2016) or big N experience (Chi and Huang, 2005; Gul et al., 2013; Zimmerman, 2016) or auditors' international working experience (Chen et al., 2017). But there is little attention paid to where auditors obtained their experience from? And how do auditors with government experience affect audit quality (AQ)? This paper aims to present the effect of auditors with government experience on AQ. Design/methodology/approach The authors used Turkish publicly traded firms in Borsa Istanbul between the year 2008 and 2015 to test the hypothesis. The sample comprises 1,067 observations and eight years. Two main proxies of government experience are used in this paper. The first proxy is auditor's government experience in the past. The second proxy is the continuous variable which is "the logarithmic value of the number of years of government experience". Further, auditor overall experience in auditing, accounting, finance and other related fields are also used as a control variable. Audit reporting aggressiveness, audit reporting lag and discretionary accruals are used as proxies of AQ. Besides this, the authors adopted the model to estimate the probability of selecting a government-experienced auditor, and they presented the regression results with the addition of inverse Mills ratio. Findings The main findings are consistent with conjecture. Government-experienced auditors do not enhance AQ. They are aggressive, and they complete audit work slowly and they cannot detect discretionary accruals effectively. Spending more time in a government agency makes them more aggressive and slow, and they do not detect earnings management practices. The Heckman estimation results regarding the variable of interest are also consistent with the main estimation results. In addition, the authors found in predicting government-experienced auditor choice that family firms, domestic firms and firms that reported losses (larger firms, older firms) are more (less) likely to choose government-experienced auditors. Originality/value This paper tries to fill the gap in the literature regarding the effect of auditor experience on AQ and concentrates on a different type of experience: Auditors with government experience.
引用
收藏
页码:722 / 748
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Remote Audit Quality, Audit Efficiency, and Auditors' ' Job Satisfaction: Implications for Audit Firms and External Auditors
    Li, Yueqi
    Goel, Sanjay
    Williams, Kevin J.
    CURRENT ISSUES IN AUDITING, 2024, 18 (02): : P20 - P28
  • [42] Does audit quality affect auditors' career development? Evidence from Chinese audit firms' demise
    Chen, Hanwen
    Feng, Yang
    Kou, Aiju
    Liu, Siyi
    MANAGERIAL AUDITING JOURNAL, 2024, 39 (04) : 419 - 441
  • [43] Do Government Initiatives and Reasons for Auditor-Client Realignment Influence Audit Fees and Audit Quality? Evidence from China
    Hwang, Nen-Chen Richard
    Liu, Wu-Po Paul
    NTU MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2020, 30 (02): : 211 - 256
  • [44] Auditors' Responses to Workload Imbalance and the Impact on Audit Quality*
    Heo, Jin Suk
    Kwon, Soo Young
    Tan, Hun-Tong
    CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2021, 38 (01) : 338 - 375
  • [45] Do auditors' early-life socioeconomic opportunities improve audit quality? Evidence from China
    Tong, Lijing
    Wu, Bin
    Zhang, Min
    BRITISH ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2022, 54 (02)
  • [46] Do regulations limiting management influence over auditors improve audit quality? Evidence from China
    Chi, Wuchun
    Lisic, Ling Lei
    Long, Xiaohai
    Wang, Kun
    JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2013, 32 (02) : 176 - 187
  • [47] Do (Fe)Male Auditors Impair Audit Quality? Evidence from Going-Concern Opinions
    Hardies, Kris
    Breesch, Diane
    Branson, Joel
    EUROPEAN ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2016, 25 (01) : 7 - 34
  • [48] Do Big 4 Auditors Provide Higher Audit Quality after Controlling for the Endogenous Choice of Auditor?
    Eshleman, John Daniel
    Guo, Peng
    AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2014, 33 (04): : 197 - 219
  • [49] Auditors' Incentives and Audit Quality: Non-Audit Services versus Contingent Audit Fees
    Mahieux, Lucas
    EUROPEAN ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2024, 33 (01) : 133 - 169
  • [50] The Effects of Using Bank Auditors on Audit Quality and the Agency Cost of Bank Loans
    Chan, K. Hung
    Jiang, Ellen Jin
    Mo, Phyllis Lai Lan
    ACCOUNTING HORIZONS, 2017, 31 (04) : 133 - 153