Global warming potential of recycled aggregate concrete with supplementary cementitious materials

被引:59
作者
Bennett, Bree [1 ]
Visintin, Phillip [1 ]
Xie, Tianyu [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Sch Civil Environm & Min Engn, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[2] Southeast Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Nanjing, Peoples R China
关键词
Life-cycle assessment; Recycled aggregate concrete; Supplementary cementitious material; CO2; uptake; Functional unit; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; FLY-ASH; HIGH-VOLUME; CARBONATION DEPTH; MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; PREDICTION; STRENGTH; DESIGN; LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104394
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Significant materials research has focused on the reduction of concrete demolition waste via reuse in recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) and the reduction in cement emissions through the use of blended binders incorporating supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs). This work is largely predicated on the assumption that the environmental impact of concrete will be reduced as a result of the inclusion of waste materials. That is, research focusing on the development of RAC mix designs has largely been conducted without parallel life-cycle assessment (LCA) to quantify the true environmental impact. Here, a LCA is conducted to quantify the global warming potential (GWP) of 590 mix designs derived from 42 studies that incorporate both recycled aggregate and a range of SCM types. The assessment considers both a volumetric functional unit and a combined volumetric and strength functional unit, the analysis also considers the absorption of atmospheric carbon via concrete carbonation both during and after service. For each type of SCM the range of predicted GWP is defined, and it is shown that substantial reductions in CO2 equivalent emissions arise from SCM addition. Further, the use of recycled aggregate is shown to be most environmentally beneficial in lower strength concretes in which it is possible to achieve the same mechanical properties as natural aggregate concrete controls.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, EFCA ENV PROD DECL E
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, FUTURE AUSTR ENERGY
[3]   Carbonation-porosity-strength model for fly ash concrete [J].
Atis, CD .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2004, 16 (01) :91-94
[4]  
Bilodeau A, 2000, ACI MATER J, V97, P41
[5]   Compared environmental and economic impact from cradle to gate of concrete with natural and recycled coarse aggregates [J].
Braga, Ana Margarida ;
Silvestre, Jose Dinis ;
de Brito, Jorge .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 162 :529-543
[6]   Model for practical carbonation depth prediction for high volume fly ash concrete and recycled aggregate concrete [J].
Carevic, Vedran ;
Ignjatovic, Ivan ;
Dragas, Jelena .
CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2019, 213 :194-208
[7]   Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Different Kinds of Concrete Containing Waste for Sustainable Construction [J].
Colangelo, Francesco ;
Forcina, Antonio ;
Farina, Ilenia ;
Petrillo, Antonella .
BUILDINGS, 2018, 8 (05)
[8]   Inclusion of carbonation during the life cycle of built and recycled concrete: influence on their carbon footprint [J].
Collins, Frank .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2010, 15 (06) :549-556
[9]   Definition of an equivalent functional unit for structural concrete incorporating recycled aggregates [J].
Dobbelaere, G. ;
de Brito, J. ;
Evangelista, L. .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2016, 122 :196-208
[10]  
Farina I., 2020, Advances in Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling, P501, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-819055-5.00024-3