Computerized Tomography Magnified Bone Windows are Superior to Standard Soft Tissue Windows for Accurate Measurement of Stone Size: An In Vitro and Clinical Study

被引:68
作者
Eisner, Brian H. [1 ]
Kambadakone, Avinash [2 ]
Monga, Manoj [4 ]
Anderson, James K. [4 ]
Thoreson, Andrew A. [5 ]
Lee, Hang [3 ]
Dretler, Stephen P. [1 ]
Sahani, Dushyant V. [2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Dept Urol, Minneapolis, MN USA
[5] Univ Minnesota, Dept Radiol, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
urinary calculi; tomography; x-ray computed; uric acid; calcium oxalate; UNENHANCED HELICAL CT; INTRAVENOUS UROGRAPHY; URETERAL CALCULI; PASSAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2008.11.116
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We determined the most accurate method of measuring urinary stones on computerized tomography. Materials and Methods: For the in vitro portion of the study 24 calculi, including 12 calcium oxalate monohydrate and 12 uric acid stones, that had been previously collected at our clinic were measured manually with hand calipers as the gold standard measurement. The calculi were then embedded into human kidney-sized potatoes and scanned using 64-slice multidetector computerized tomography. Computerized tomography measurements were performed at 4 window settings, including standard soft tissue windows (window width-320 and window length-50), standard bone windows (window width-1120 and window length-300), 5.13x magnified soft tissue windows and 5.13x magnified bone windows. Maximum stone dimensions were recorded. For the in vivo portion of the study 41 patients with distal ureteral stones who underwent noncontrast computerized tomography and subsequently spontaneously passed the stones were analyzed. All analyzed stones were 100% calcium oxalate monochydrate or mixed, calcium based stones. Stones were prospectively collected at the clinic and the largest diameter was measured with digital calipers as the gold standard. This was compared to computerized tomography measurements using 4.0x magnified soft tissue windows and 4.0x magnified bone windows. Statistical comparisons were performed using Pearson's correlation and paired t test. Results: In the in vitro portion of the study the most accurate measurements were obtained using 5.13x magnified bone windows with a mean 0.13 mm difference from caliper measurement (p = 0.6). Measurements performed in the soft tissue window with and without magnification, and in the bone window without magnification were significantly different from hand caliper measurements (mean difference 1.2, 1.9 and 1.4 mm, p = 0.003, <0.001 and 0.0002, respectively). When comparing measurement errors between stones of different composition in vitro, the error for calcium oxalate calculi was significantly different from the gold standard for all methods except bone window settings with magnification. For uric acid calculi the measurement error was observed only in standard soft tissue window settings. In vivo 4.0x magnified bone windows was superior to 4.0x magnified soft tissue windows in measurement accuracy. Magnified bone window measurements were not statistically different from digital caliper measurements (mean underestimation vs digital caliper 0.3 mm, p = 0.4), while magnified soft tissue windows were statistically distinct (mean underestimation 1.4 mm, p = 0.001). Conclusions: In this study magnified bone windows were the most accurate method of stone measurements in vitro and in vivo. Therefore, we recommend the routine use of magnified bone windows for computerized tomography measurement of stones. In vitro the measurement error in calcium oxalate stones was greater than that in uric acid stones, suggesting that stone composition may be responsible for measurement inaccuracies.
引用
收藏
页码:1710 / 1715
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Can noncontrast helical computed tomography replace intravenous urography for evaluation of patients with acute urinary tract colic? [J].
Chen, MYM ;
Zagoria, RJ .
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1999, 17 (02) :299-303
[2]   Medical therapy to facilitate urinary stone passage: a meta-analysis [J].
Hollingsworth, John M. ;
Rogers, Mary A. M. ;
Kaufman, Samuel R. ;
Bradford, Timothy J. ;
Saint, Sanjay ;
Wei, John T. ;
Hollenbeck, Brent K. .
LANCET, 2006, 368 (9542) :1171-1179
[3]   Unenhanced helical CT of ureteral stones: Incidence of associated urinary tract findings [J].
Katz, DS ;
Lane, MJ ;
Sommer, FG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 166 (06) :1319-1322
[4]   Value of automated coronal reformations from 64-section multidetector row computerized tomography in the diagnosis of urinary stone disease [J].
Lin, Wen-Chiung ;
Uppot, Raul N. ;
Li, Chao-Shiang ;
Hahn, Peter F. ;
Sahani, Dushyant V. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (03) :907-911
[5]   Time to stone passage for observed ureteral calculi: A guide for patient education [J].
Miller, OF ;
Kane, CJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (03) :688-690
[6]   Imaging in acute renal colic: The intravenous urogram remains the gold standard [J].
Mutazindwa, T ;
Husseini, T .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1996, 23 (03) :238-240
[7]   Comparison of helical computerized tomography and plain radiography for estimating urinary stone size [J].
Narepalem, N ;
Sundaram, CP ;
Boridy, IC ;
Yan, Y ;
Heiken, JP ;
Clayman, RV .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (03) :1235-1238
[8]   2007 guideline for the management of Ureteral calculi [J].
Preminger, Glenn M. ;
Tiselius, Hans-Goeran ;
Assimos, Dean G. ;
Alken, Peter ;
Buck, Colin ;
Gallucci, Michele ;
Knoll, Thomas ;
Lingeman, James E. ;
Nakada, Stephen Y. ;
Pearle, Margaret Sue ;
Sarica, Kemal ;
Tuerk, Christian ;
Wolf, J. Stuart, Jr. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (06) :2418-2434
[9]   Suspected ureteral colic:: plain film and sonography vs unenhanced helical CT.: A prospective study in 66 patients [J].
Ripollés, T ;
Agramunt, M ;
Errando, J ;
Martínez, MJ ;
Coronel, B ;
Morales, M .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (01) :129-136
[10]   ACUTE FLANK PAIN - COMPARISON OF NON-CONTRAST-ENHANCED CT AND INTRAVENOUS UROGRAPHY [J].
SMITH, RC ;
ROSENFIELD, AT ;
CHOE, KA ;
ESSENMACHER, KR ;
VERGA, M ;
GLICKMAN, MG ;
LANGE, RC .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 194 (03) :789-794