Self-Collected Saline Gargle Samples as an Alternative to Health Care Worker-Collected Nasopharyngeal Swabs for COVID-19 Diagnosis in Outpatients

被引:67
作者
Goldfarb, David M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tilley, Peter [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Al-Rawahi, Ghada N. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Srigley, Jocelyn A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ford, Geoffrey [4 ]
Pedersen, Heather [4 ]
Pabbi, Abhilasha [3 ,5 ]
Hannam-Clark, Stephanie [3 ,5 ]
Charles, Marthe [1 ,6 ]
Dittrick, Michelle [1 ]
Gadkar, Vijay J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pernica, Jeffrey M. [7 ]
Hoang, Linda M. N. [1 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] BC Childrens Hosp, Div Med Microbiol, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] BC Womens Hosp & Hlth Ctr, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] BC Ctr Dis Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[5] BC Childrens Hosp, Clin Informat, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[6] Vancouver Gen Hosp, Div Med Microbiol, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[7] McMaster Univ, Dept Pediat, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[8] BC Ctr Dis Control, Publ Hlth Lab, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; gargle; saliva; PCR;
D O I
10.1128/JCM.02427-20
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
We assessed the performance, stability, and user acceptability of swab-independent self-collected saliva and saline mouth rinse/gargle sample types for the molecular detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in adults and school-aged children. Outpatients who had recently been diagnosed with COVID-19 or were presenting with suspected COVID-19 were asked to have a nasopharyngeal (NP) swab collected and provide at least one self-collected sample type. Participants were also asked about sample acceptability using a five-point Likert scale. For those previously diagnosed with COVID-19, all samples underwent real-time PCR testing using a lab-developed assay, and the majority were also tested using an FDA-authorized assay. For those presenting with suspected COVID-19, only those with a positive nasopharyngeal swab sample went on to have other samples tested. Saline mouth rinse/gargle and saliva samples were tested daily at time zero, day 1, and day 2 to assess nucleic acid stability at room temperature. Fifty participants (aged 4 to 71 years) were included; of these, 40 had at least one positive sample and were included in the primary sample yield analysis. Saline mouth rinse/gargle samples had a sensitivity of 98% (39/40), while saliva samples had a sensitivity of 79% (26/33). Both saline mouth rinse/gargle and saliva samples showed stable viral RNA detection after 2 days of room temperature storage. Mouth rinse/gargle samples had the highest (mean, 4.9) and health care worker (HCW)-collected NP swabs had the lowest acceptability scores (mean, 3.1). In conclusion, saline mouth rinse/gargle samples demonstrated higher combined user acceptability ratings and analytical performance than saliva and HCW-collected NP swabs. This sample type is a promising swab-independent option, particularly for outpatient self-collection in adults and school-aged children.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Verification of Cepheid Xpert Xpress Flu/RSV assay for use with gargle samples, sputa and endotracheal secretions
    Bennett, S.
    MacLean, A.
    Gunson, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2019, 101 (01) : 114 - 115
  • [2] Comparison of gargle samples and throat swab samples for the detection of respiratory pathogens
    Bennett, Susan
    Davidson, Rhona S.
    Gunson, Rory N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2017, 248 : 83 - 86
  • [3] Open Development and Clinical Validation of Multiple 3D-Printed Nasopharyngeal Collection Swabs: Rapid Resolution of a Critical COVID-19 Testing Bottleneck
    Callahan, Cody J.
    Lee, Rose
    Zulauf, Katelyn E.
    Tamburello, Lauren
    Smith, Kenneth P.
    Previtera, Joe
    Cheng, Annie
    Green, Alex
    Azim, Ahmed Abdul
    Yano, Amanda
    Doraiswami, Nancy
    Kirby, James E.
    Arnaout, Ramy A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 58 (08)
  • [4] Cesari Matteo, 2020, Can Geriatr J, V23, P155, DOI 10.5770/cgj.23.445
  • [5] Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Diagnosis of COVID-19 (June 2020)
    Hanson, Kimberly E.
    Caliendo, Angela M.
    Arias, Cesar A.
    Englund, Janet A.
    Lee, Mark J.
    Loeb, Mark
    Patel, Robin
    El Alayli, Abdallah
    Kalot, Mohamad A.
    Falck-Ytter, Yngve
    Lavergne, Valery
    Morgan, Rebecca L.
    Murad, M. Hassan
    Sultan, Shahnaz
    Bhimraj, Adarsh
    Mustafa, Reem A.
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 78 (07) : e106 - e132
  • [6] LeBlanc J.J., 2020, J CLIN VIROL, V128, DOI 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104433
  • [7] Pharynx gargle samples are suitable for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic use and save personal protective equipment and swabs
    Malecki, Monika
    Lusebrink, Jessica
    Teves, Stefanie
    Wendel, Andreas F.
    [J]. INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 42 (02) : 248 - 249
  • [8] Gargle lavage as a viable alternative to swab for detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Mittal, Ankit
    Gupta, Ankesh
    Kumar, Shiv
    Surjit, Milan
    Singh, Binit
    Soneja, Manish
    Soni, Kapil Dev
    Khan, Adil Rashid
    Singh, Komal
    Naik, Shivdas
    Kumar, Arvind
    Aggarwal, Richa
    Nischal, Neeraj
    Sinha, Sanjeev
    Trikha, Anjan
    Wig, Naveet
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 152 (01) : 77 - 81
  • [9] Respiratory Virus Infections Working Group1, 2020, Can Commun Dis Rep, V46, P112, DOI 10.14745/ccdr.v46i05a02
  • [10] Gargle Lavage as a Safe and Sensitive Alternative to Swab Samples to Diagnose COVID-19: A Case Report in Japan
    Saito, Makoto
    Adachi, Eisuke
    Yamayoshi, Seiya
    Koga, Michiko
    Iwatsuki-Horimoto, Kiyoko
    Kawaoka, Yoshihiro
    Yotsuyanagi, Hiroshi
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 71 (15) : 893 - 894