Measuring Trust with Psychophysiological Signals: A Systematic Mapping Study of Approaches Used

被引:30
作者
Ben Ajenaghughrure, Ighoyota [1 ]
Sousa, Sonia Da Costa [1 ]
Lamas, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Tallinn Univ, Sch Digital Technol, Narva Mnt 25, EE-10120 Tallinn, Estonia
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
psychophysiology; trust; human-to-human relationship; human-to-technology relationship; NEURAL DEVELOPMENT; BRAIN RESPONSES; TRUSTWORTHINESS; TECHNOLOGY; DISTRUST; EXPERIENCES; REPUTATION; DECISIONS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.3390/mti4030063
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Trust plays an essential role in all human relationships. However, measuring trust remains a challenge for researchers exploring psychophysiological signals. Therefore, this article aims to systematically map the approaches used in studies assessing trust with psychophysiological signals. In particular, we examine the numbers and frequency of combined psychophysiological signals, the primary outcomes of previous studies, and the types and most commonly used data analysis techniques for analyzing psychophysiological data to infer a trust state. For this purpose, we employ a systematic mapping review method, through which we analyze 51 carefully selected articles (studies focused on trust using psychophysiology). Two significant findings are as follows: (1) Psychophysiological signals from EEG(electroencephalogram) and ECG(electrocardiogram) for monitoring peripheral and central nervous systems are the most frequently used to measure trust, while audio and EOG(electro-oculography) psychophysiological signals are the least commonly used. Moreover, the maximum number of psychophysiological signals ever combined so far is three (2). Most of which are peripheral nervous system monitoring psychophysiological signals that are low in spatial resolution. (3) Regarding outcomes: there is only one tool proposed for assessing trust in an interpersonal context, excluding trust in a technology context. Moreover, there are no stable and accurate ensemble models that have been developed to assess trust; all prior attempts led to unstable but fairly accurate models or did not satisfy the conditions for combining several algorithms (ensemble). In conclusion, the extent to which trust can be assessed using psychophysiological measures during user interactions (real-time) remains unknown, as there several issues, such as the lack of a stable and accurate ensemble trust classifier model, among others, that require urgent research attention. Although this topic is relatively new, much work has been done. However, more remains to be done to provide clarity on this topic.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 29
页数:29
相关论文
共 109 条
[1]   Neural signatures of betrayal aversion: an fMRI study of trust [J].
Aimone, Jason A. ;
Houser, Daniel ;
Weber, Bernd .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 281 (1782)
[2]   A Classification Model for Sensing Human Trust in Machines Using EEG and GSR [J].
Akash, Kumar ;
Hu, Wan-Lin ;
Jain, Neera ;
Reid, Tahira .
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2018, 8 (04)
[3]  
Akash K, 2018, P AMER CONTR CONF, P246, DOI 10.23919/ACC.2018.8431132
[4]  
Akash K, 2017, P AMER CONTR CONF, P1542, DOI 10.23919/ACC.2017.7963172
[5]   A brief review: history to understand fundamentals of electrocardiography [J].
AlGhatrif, Majd ;
Lindsay, Joseph .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INTERNAL MEDICINE PERSPECTIVES, 2012, 2 (01)
[6]  
Almehmadi Abdulaziz, 2016, 2016 14th Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust (PST), P437, DOI 10.1109/PST.2016.7907006
[7]  
Alotaibi Mutlaq B., 2014, Journal of Computer Science, V10, P2315, DOI 10.3844/jcssp.2014.2315.2329
[8]  
Ampel F.J., 1993, AUDIO ENG SOC CONVEN, V94
[9]  
Andreassi J., 2000, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY HUM
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2003, THESIS