Understanding the function of bonding courses in masonry construction: An investigation with mixed numerical methods

被引:13
作者
Napolitano, Rebecca [1 ]
Glisic, Branko [1 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Bonding courses; Masonry; Numerical modeling; Settlement; Finite distinct element modeling; CRACK PATTERNS; ELEMENT METHOD; LIMIT ANALYSIS; DISCRETE; INPLANE; MODELS; DEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.culher.2019.03.007
中图分类号
K85 [文物考古];
学科分类号
0601 ;
摘要
Bonding courses, also called leveling courses, are ubiquitous in historical masonry structures. While this technique is common, there is no clear understanding of their structural function. Many works have postulated that this construction typology denotes the end of a workday or the height of one shuttering. Additionally, many sources contradict each other about the structural functionality of bonding courses. While some works have claimed that they create a structural weakness, others have asserted that they must be a structural advantage since they are ubiquitous. The aim of this paper is to study the behavior of bonding courses to understand their potential structural functionality. Using a mixed numerical method, i.e., combining finite element modeling and distinct element modeling, the structural response of the bonding courses is simulated. Under differential settlement of foundations, damages were seen to be localized in the walls with bonding courses. Performed analysis indicates that bonding courses had a positive contribution to the structural safety of the walls. A study of how the height of the bonding course affects this performance was also carried out. (C) 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 129
页数:10
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Adam Jean-Pierre., 1999, Roman Building: Materials and Techniques
[2]  
Adkins Lesley., 2014, Handbook to life in ancient Rome
[3]   Crack Patterns Induced by Foundation Settlements: Integrated Analysis on a Renaissance Masonry Palace in Italy [J].
Alessandri, Claudio ;
Garutti, Massimo ;
Mallardo, Vincenzo ;
Milani, Gabriele .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE, 2015, 9 (02) :111-129
[4]  
Alexandris A., 2004, Proceedings of the 13th WCEE - World Conference of Earthquake Engineering, number, V548, P1
[5]   Rigid block models for masonry structures [J].
Angelillo, Maurizio ;
Fortunato, Antonio ;
Gesualdo, Antonio ;
Iannuzzo, Antonino ;
Zuccaro, Giulio .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MASONRY RESEARCH AND INNOVATION, 2018, 3 (04) :349-368
[6]  
Asteris P., 2015, ADV CIVIL IND ENG AC, V2
[7]   Hybrid discrete element/finite element method for fracture analysis [J].
Azevedo, N. Monteiro ;
Lemos, J. V. .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2006, 195 (33-36) :4579-4593
[8]   In plane loaded masonry walls: DEM and FEM/DEM models. A critical review [J].
Baraldi, Daniele ;
Reccia, Emanuele ;
Cecchi, Antonella .
MECCANICA, 2018, 53 (07) :1613-1628
[9]   COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NUMERICAL DISCRETE AND FINITE ELEMENT MODELS: THE CASE OF IN-PLANE LOADED PERIODIC BRICKWORK [J].
Baraldi, Daniele ;
Reccia, Emanuele ;
Cazzani, Antonio ;
Cecchi, Antonella .
COMPOSITES-MECHANICS COMPUTATIONS APPLICATIONS, 2013, 4 (04) :319-344
[10]   Augustus Bridge in Narni (Italy): Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of the Still Standing Part, Possible Causes of Collapse, and Importance of the Roman Concrete Infill in the Seismic-Resistant Behavior [J].
Bertolesi, Elisa ;
Milani, Gabriele ;
Lopane, Fulvio Domenico ;
Acito, Maurizio .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE, 2017, 11 (05) :717-746