Pregnant women's preferences and knowledge of term breech management, in an Australian setting

被引:40
作者
Raynes-Greenow, CH
Roberts, CL
Barratt, A
Brodrick, B
Peat, B
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Ctr Perinatal Hlth Serv Res, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Royal Prince Alfred, Women & Babies, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Screening & Test Evaluat Program, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[4] Womens & Childrens Hosp, Dept Obstet, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Univ Adelaide, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.midw.2003.10.002
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Objective: to assess women's familiarity with breech presentation and external cephalic version (ECV), and to identify women's preferences and attitudes regarding breech management. Design: cross-sectional survey. Setting: King George V (KGV) Memorial Hospital for Mothers and Babies, Sydney, Australia, a major metropolitan teaching hospital. Population: 174 pregnant women (20-38 weeks gestation) attending KGV for antenatal care in 2001. Methods: data were obtained from a self-administered questionnaire that was distributed through the antenatal clinics. Main outcome measures: women's familiarity of breech presentation and ECV, women's attitude towards ECV, decision to attempt ECV, and with whom participants would like to make a decision regarding ECV. Findings: of the 174 respondents, 85% could correctly identify breech presentation, and 66% had heard of ECV. For 87% this information was from books, and family/ friends, and not their midwife/doctor. Equal numbers of women responded that they would or would not choose ECV (39%), and the remaining 22% were uncertain. Factors influencing their decision included concerns about the safety for the baby, ECV not guaranteeing vaginal birth despite successful version, and ECV not being effective enough. Seventy-two per cent wanted to make the decision to attempt ECV together with their doctor. Conclusion: although the majority of the women had a preference for vaginal birth, their knowledge of ECV appeared insufficient to enable them to make informed decisions about attempting ECV. These findings suggest that care-providers should offer women information on ECV, in a shared-decision-making environment. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 187
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   BREECH PRESENTATION IN SPAIN, 1992 - A COLLABORATIVE STUDY [J].
ACIEN, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1995, 62 (01) :19-24
[2]  
Apuzzio JJ, 2002, ACTA OBSTET GYN SCAN, V81, P1091
[3]   SATISFACTION WITH CARE IN LABOR AND BIRTH - A SURVEY OF 790 AUSTRALIAN WOMEN [J].
BROWN, S ;
LUMLEY, J .
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 1994, 21 (01) :4-13
[4]   Attitudes of Singapore women toward cesarean and vaginal deliveries [J].
Chong, ESY ;
Mongelli, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2003, 80 (02) :189-194
[5]   Women's preference for a cesarean section: Incidence and associated factors [J].
Gamble, JA ;
Creedy, DK .
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2001, 28 (02) :101-110
[6]   An investigation of women's involvement in the decision to deliver by caesarean section [J].
Graham, WJ ;
Hundley, V ;
McCheyne, AL ;
Hall, MH ;
Gurney, E ;
Milne, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1999, 106 (03) :213-220
[7]   Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial [J].
Hannah, ME ;
Hannah, WJ ;
Hewson, SA ;
Hodnett, ED ;
Saigal, S ;
Willan, AR .
LANCET, 2000, 356 (9239) :1375-1383
[8]   Few women wish to be delivered by caesarean section [J].
Hildingsson, I ;
Rådestad, I ;
Rubertsson, C ;
Waldenström, U .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2002, 109 (06) :618-623
[9]   EFFECT OF EXTERNAL CEPHALIC VERSION IN LATE PREGNANCY ON BREECH PRESENTATION AND CESAREAN-SECTION RATE - A CONTROLLED TRIAL [J].
HOFMEYR, GJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1983, 90 (05) :392-399
[10]  
HOFMEYR GJ, 2003, COCHRANE LIB