Estimating quantitative genetic parameters in wild populations: a comparison of pedigree and genomic approaches

被引:142
作者
Berenos, Camillo [1 ]
Ellis, Philip A. [1 ]
Pilkington, Jill G. [1 ]
Pemberton, Josephine M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Inst Evolutionary Biol, Sch Biol Sci, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, Midlothian, Scotland
基金
欧洲研究理事会; 英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
body size; genetic architecture; genomic relatedness; heritability; maternal genetic effect; SNP genotyping; BODY-SIZE; NATURAL-POPULATIONS; SOAY SHEEP; SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATION; SIRE MISIDENTIFICATION; VARIANCE-COMPONENTS; RELATIONSHIP MATRIX; WEANING WEIGHT; COMPLEX TRAITS; ANIMAL-MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/mec.12827
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The estimation of quantitative genetic parameters in wild populations is generally limited by the accuracy and completeness of the available pedigree information. Using relatedness at genomewide markers can potentially remove this limitation and lead to less biased and more precise estimates. We estimated heritability, maternal genetic effects and genetic correlations for body size traits in an unmanaged long-term study population of Soay sheep on St Kilda using three increasingly complete and accurate estimates of relatedness: (i) Pedigree 1, using observation-derived maternal links and microsatellite-derived paternal links; (ii) Pedigree 2, using SNP-derived assignment of both maternity and paternity; and (iii) whole-genome relatedness at 37 037 autosomal SNPs. In initial analyses, heritability estimates were strikingly similar for all three methods, while standard errors were systematically lower in analyses based on Pedigree 2 and genomic relatedness. Genetic correlations were generally strong, differed little between the three estimates of relatedness and the standard errors declined only very slightly with improved relatedness information. When partitioning maternal effects into separate genetic and environmental components, maternal genetic effects found in juvenile traits increased substantially across the three relatedness estimates. Heritability declined compared to parallel models where only a maternal environment effect was fitted, suggesting that maternal genetic effects are confounded with direct genetic effects and that more accurate estimates of relatedness were better able to separate maternal genetic effects from direct genetic effects. We found that the heritability captured by SNP markers asymptoted at about half the SNPs available, suggesting that denser marker panels are not necessarily required for precise and unbiased heritability estimates. Finally, we present guidelines for the use of genomic relatedness in future quantitative genetics studies in natural populations.
引用
收藏
页码:3434 / 3451
页数:18
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] Estimating Heritabilities and Genetic Correlations: Comparing the 'Animal Model' with Parent-Offspring Regression Using Data from a Natural Population
    Akesson, Mikael
    Bensch, Staffan
    Hasselquist, Dennis
    Tarka, Maja
    Hansson, Bengt
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2008, 3 (03):
  • [2] Impact of paternity errors in cow identification on genetic evaluations and international comparisons
    Banos, G
    Wiggans, GR
    Powell, RL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2001, 84 (11) : 2523 - 2529
  • [3] Mapping quantitative trait loci underlying fitness-related traits in a free-living sheep population
    Beraldi, Dario
    McRae, Allan F.
    Gratten, Jacob
    Slate, Jon
    Visscher, Peter M.
    Pemberton, Josephine M.
    [J]. EVOLUTION, 2007, 61 (06) : 1403 - 1416
  • [4] The joint effects of kin, multilevel selection and indirect genetic effects on response to genetic selection
    Bijma, P.
    Wade, M. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2008, 21 (05) : 1175 - 1188
  • [5] The evolution of body size: What keeps organisms small?
    Blanckenhorn, WU
    [J]. QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY, 2000, 75 (04) : 385 - 407
  • [6] A tale of two matrices: multivariate approaches in evolutionary biology
    Blows, M. W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2007, 20 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [7] How do misassigned paternities affect the estimation of heritability in the wild?
    Charmantier, A
    Réale, D
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2005, 14 (09) : 2839 - 2850
  • [8] Clément V, 2001, GENET SEL EVOL, V33, P369, DOI 10.1051/gse:2001123
  • [9] Clutton-Brock TH, 2004, SOAY SHEEP: DYNAMICS AND SELECTION IN AN ISLAND POPULATION, P17
  • [10] Coltman DW, 2001, EVOLUTION, V55, P2116, DOI 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01326.x