A prospective randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial comparing mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol to vaginal misoprostol alone for elective termination of early pregnancy

被引:75
|
作者
Jain, JK
Dutton, C
Harwood, B
Meckstroth, KR
Mishell, DR
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Womens & Childrens Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Magee Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco Gen Hosp, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA
关键词
abortion; medical abortion; mifepristone; misoprostol; pregnancy;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/17.6.1477
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Vaginal misoprostol has been shown to be an effective single agent for medical abortion. This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial compared a regimen of mifepristone and misoprostol with misoprostol alone for termination of early pregnancy. METHODS: 250 women with gestations less than or equal to56 days were randomized by a random number table to receive either 200 mg mifepristone orally or placebo followed 48 h later by 800 mug vaginal misoprostol. Administration of misoprostol was repeated every 24 h up to three doses if abortion failed to occur. Abortion success was defined as complete abortion without the use of surgical aspiration. RESULTS: Successful medical abortions occurred in 114 out of 119 subjects (95.7%) after mifepristone followed by vaginal misoprostol. In all, 110 out of 125 subjects (88.0%) successfully aborted after placebo and vaginal misoprostol. The higher success rate of complete abortion with the mifepristone and misoprostol regimen was statistically significant compared with the placebo and misoprostol regimen (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A regimen of mifepristone and misoprostol was significantly more effective for termination of pregnancies less than or equal to56 days than misoprostol alone. The 88% efficacy obtained with vaginal misoprostol alone may be clinically acceptable when mifepristone is not available.
引用
收藏
页码:1477 / 1482
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A randomized controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone gel for labor induction
    Girija S.
    Manjunath A.P.
    The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2011, 61 (2) : 153 - 160
  • [32] A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Low Dose Vaginal Misoprostol and Dinoprostone Gel for Labor Induction
    Shivarudraiah, Girija
    Palaksha, Manjunath Attibele
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2011, 61 (02): : 153 - 160
  • [33] A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing vaginal misoprostol and osmotic dilator in achieving cervical ripening before operative hysteroscopy
    Yu, Dan
    Li, Tin-Chiu
    Xia, Enlan
    Huang, Xiaowu
    GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY, 2006, 3 (03) : 186 - 189
  • [34] A pilot study to compare propranolol and misoprostol versus misoprostol and placebo for induction of labor in primigravidae; a randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial
    Ahmed Sherif Abdel Hamid
    Hazem El Zeneiny
    Ahmed Fathy
    Maii Nawara
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 23
  • [35] Effect of extra-amniotic Foley’s catheter and vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol alone on cervical ripening and induction of labor in Kenya, a randomized controlled trial
    Alfred Osoti
    Davies Kiprop Kibii
    Tito Mario Kual Tong
    Innocent Maranga
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 18
  • [36] A pilot study to compare propranolol and misoprostol versus misoprostol and placebo for induction of labor in primigravidae; a randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial
    Hamid, Ahmed Sherif Abdel
    El Zeneiny, Hazem
    Fathy, Ahmed
    Nawara, Maii
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [37] Effect of extra-amniotic Foley's catheter and vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol alone on cervical ripening and induction of labor in Kenya, a randomized controlled trial
    Osoti, Alfred
    Kibii, Davies Kiprop
    Tong, Tito Mario Kual
    Maranga, Innocent
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2018, 18
  • [38] Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: A double-blind randomized controlled trial
    Fisher, SA
    Mackenzie, VP
    Davies, GAL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (04) : 906 - 910
  • [39] Effectiveness and Safety of Lower Doses of Mifepristone Combined With Misoprostol for the Termination of Ultra-Early Pregnancy: A Dose-Ranging Randomized Controlled Trial
    Li, Cui-Lan
    Chen, Dun-Jin
    Song, Li-Ping
    Wang, Yan
    Zhang, Zhong-Fang
    Liu, Ming-Xing
    Chen, Wei-Ling
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2015, 22 (06) : 706 - 711
  • [40] Effectiveness and Safety of Lower Doses of Mifepristone Combined With Misoprostol for the Termination of Ultra-Early Pregnancy: A Dose-Ranging Randomized Controlled Trial
    Cui-Lan Li
    Dun-Jin Chen
    Li-Ping Song
    Yan Wang
    Zhong-Fang Zhang
    Ming-Xing Liu
    Wei-Ling Chen
    Reproductive Sciences, 2015, 22 : 706 - 711