A prospective randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial comparing mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol to vaginal misoprostol alone for elective termination of early pregnancy

被引:75
|
作者
Jain, JK
Dutton, C
Harwood, B
Meckstroth, KR
Mishell, DR
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Womens & Childrens Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Magee Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco Gen Hosp, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA
关键词
abortion; medical abortion; mifepristone; misoprostol; pregnancy;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/17.6.1477
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Vaginal misoprostol has been shown to be an effective single agent for medical abortion. This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial compared a regimen of mifepristone and misoprostol with misoprostol alone for termination of early pregnancy. METHODS: 250 women with gestations less than or equal to56 days were randomized by a random number table to receive either 200 mg mifepristone orally or placebo followed 48 h later by 800 mug vaginal misoprostol. Administration of misoprostol was repeated every 24 h up to three doses if abortion failed to occur. Abortion success was defined as complete abortion without the use of surgical aspiration. RESULTS: Successful medical abortions occurred in 114 out of 119 subjects (95.7%) after mifepristone followed by vaginal misoprostol. In all, 110 out of 125 subjects (88.0%) successfully aborted after placebo and vaginal misoprostol. The higher success rate of complete abortion with the mifepristone and misoprostol regimen was statistically significant compared with the placebo and misoprostol regimen (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A regimen of mifepristone and misoprostol was significantly more effective for termination of pregnancies less than or equal to56 days than misoprostol alone. The 88% efficacy obtained with vaginal misoprostol alone may be clinically acceptable when mifepristone is not available.
引用
收藏
页码:1477 / 1482
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Placebo-controlled randomized comparison of vaginal with rectal misoprostol in the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage
    Ozkaya, O
    Sezik, M
    Kaya, H
    Desdicioglu, R
    Dittrich, R
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2005, 31 (05) : 389 - 393
  • [22] Can Vaginal Misoprostol Effectively Increase Rate of a Satisfactory Colposcopy? A Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Trial*
    Thanapprapasr, Duangmani
    Wilailak, Sarikapan
    Ayudhya, Nathpong Israngura Na
    Lertkhachonsuk, Arb-aroon
    Likittanasombut, Puchong
    Chittithaworn, Suwicha
    Charakorn, Chuenkamon
    Weerakiet, Sawaek
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 40 (03) : 203 - 207
  • [23] Effect of vaginal misoprostol on pregnancy rate after intrauterine insemination: a randomized controlled trial
    Sorouri, Ziba Zahiri
    Asgharnia, Maryan
    Gholampoor, Ameneh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE, 2015, 13 (01) : 9 - 14
  • [24] A double-blind randomized controlled trial of mifepristone or placebo before buccal misoprostol for abortion at 14-21 weeks of pregnancy
    Dabash, Rasha
    Chelli, Hela
    Hajri, Selma
    Shochet, Tara
    Raghavan, Sheila
    Winikoff, Beverly
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2015, 130 (01) : 40 - 44
  • [26] Sublingual versus Vaginal Misoprostol for the Induction of Labor at Term: A Randomized, Triple-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial
    Jahromi, Bahia Namavar
    Poorgholam, Foroogh
    Yousefi, Gholamhossein
    Salarian, Leila
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 41 (02) : 79 - 85
  • [27] Incomplete miscarriage: a randomized controlled trial comparing oral with vaginal misoprostol for medical evacuation
    Pang, MW
    Lee, TS
    Chung, TKH
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 (11) : 2283 - 2287
  • [28] Double-blind randomized trial of mifepristone in combination with vaginal gemeprost or misoprostol for induction of abortion up to 63 days gestation
    Bartley, J
    Brown, A
    Elton, R
    Baird, DT
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 (10) : 2098 - 2102
  • [29] A randomized controlled trial comparing two protocols for the use of misoprostol in midtrimester pregnancy termination
    Bebbington, MW
    Kent, N
    Lim, K
    Gagnon, A
    Delisle, MF
    Tessier, F
    Wilson, RD
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 187 (04) : 853 - 857
  • [30] Randomized trial of oral versus vaginal misoprostol 2 days after mifepristone 200 mg for abortion up to 63 days of pregnancy
    Schaff, EA
    Fielding, SL
    Westhoff, C
    CONTRACEPTION, 2002, 66 (04) : 247 - 250